Examining Philosophical Perspectives on Sugary Drink Bans

Utilitarianism theory specifies that actions are best if they are beneficial or for the advantage of large number of people (pg 59, Moral Issues in Business). A practical would state that health is significant issue for the bulk. Numerous health concerns are brought on by direct or indirect result of drinking large sugary drinks including obesity. More then half of the US population struggle with weight problems and one of the factors that adds to it is beverage- ing large sugary beverages.

Health would produce greatest possible balance of good over bad for everybody. A Practical would argue stating would not good health makes individuals happier. Health also suggests less health expense and federal government costs less cash into something that can be quickly controlled and spending money on something that is much more needed like complimentary college education. A practical would support federal government restriction on big sugary beverages arguing on the reality that ban on big sugary beverages would trigger less health issues which in turn would make everyone pleased.

Get quality help now

Dr. Karlyna PhD

Verified writer

Proficient in: Beverages

4.7 (235)

“ Amazing writer! I am really satisfied with her work. An excellent price as well. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

Libertarianism is a viewpoint of individual liberty - the liberty of everyone to live air conditioner - cording to his own choices devoid of the disturbance of other (pg 113, Moral Issues in Service). Libertarians would oppose the to the ban of big sugary drinks. They would argue that if must be personal option if people wish to consume large drinks or small beverages. Libertarians believe in liv- ing life on our own please.

They would argue about federal government interference on people making their choice considering that it would go versus their worth.

Rawls conceives society as a cooperative endeavor amongst its members and elaborates a conception of justice that is completely social (pg 119, Moral Issues in Business). Rawls would not agree on soda ban in NYC because Rawls think in everyone to have equal right. They would probably refute of mayor Bloomberg strategy on banning big sweet beverages. Rawls would claim that everyone have equal right and equal liberty to drink any kind and size of drink they desire.

The only way Rawls would let the soda ban be effective is by providing justification that it would be work for the least advantaged members of society. By least advantaged means people who are suffering from disease related to drinking sugary drinks. Should the ban be age specific ? Different group of people would think this in a different way. A Utilitarian would impose age re- striction on sugary drinks since they would argue that sugary drinks are major health concerns and major factor to obesity and issues related to it.

A Libertarian would say it would be personal choice to drink sugary drinks or not and Rawls would argue that age should not have any thing to do with sugary drinks. Everyone has equal rights and equal justice. In my opinion there should be not be age restriction on sugary drinks. Young people have more active life style. Caffeine and sugar could be one of the major source of energy. It should be parent’s responsibility to impose the limitation on how much sugary drink they should be al- lowed to drink.