To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
As I reviewed McGrath, Lyng, and Hourican's (2012) study, I couldn't help but notice the crucial significance of the study title's length and clarity. Following Connell Meehan's (1999) guidelines, titles should ideally fall between 10 and 15 words, effectively conveying the study's purpose (Coughlan et al., 2007). Unfortunately, the title, "From the Simulation Lab to the Ward: Preparing 4th Year Nursing Students for the Role of Staff Nurse," goes beyond this range with 18 words, prompting concerns about potential confusion or misrepresentation of the study's variables (Parahoo, 2006).
It becomes apparent that an effective research study must present a clear articulation of the research problem.
According to Bassett and Bassett (2003), the introduction should introduce the research problem to the reader. However, in the case of McGrath et al.'s study, the problem was not distinctly stated in the introduction. Whether termed as the research problem or the purpose of the study, the introduction should, at the very least, broadly indicate what will be studied (Polit and Beck, 2006).
Upon delving into the study, it becomes clear that the main goal is to explore the relationship between management styles and nurses' retention at private hospitals.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Data Analysis
5 (893)
“ Thank you so much for accepting my assignment the night before it was due. I look forward to working with you moving forward ”
The study employs Likert's Profile of Organizational Characteristics, aiming to measure nurses' perceptions of management styles, allow them to describe the practiced system, and indicate their desired future management system. This focus is particularly significant in nursing practice and administration, underlining the crucial role of management styles in staff nurses' retention (McGrath et al., 2012).
I couldn't help but notice the absence of a clearly stated research hypothesis.
A research hypothesis is essentially a specific, testable prediction about the study's outcome (Shuttleworth, 2008). Its omission in the study, coupled with the lack of justification, raises concerns about the research's foundational framework.
One can argue that an effective research study establishes clear links between its aims, literature review, research design, data collection, discussion of issues, and conclusions (Nordquist, 2009). In the case of McGrath et al.'s study, however, there seems to be a gap in the seamless integration between the literature review and the study's aims. The literature review, defined as a process of analyzing and summarizing scholarly materials about a specific topic (Sage, 1998), should directly support the research aims, providing a solid foundation for the study.
It's worth noting the potential reinforcement of the research statement through various references used in the study. However, a more explicit connection between the literature review and the research aims is essential for a robust research framework.
Before delving into the methodology, it is essential to address the ethical considerations. The study obtained permission from the ethical committee of the Faculty of Nursing and the directors of the hospitals involved. While this demonstrates ethical awareness, it's hard to ignore the absence of information regarding the principle of confidentiality and full disclosure during data gathering. Polit and Beck (2008) emphasize the importance of complete confidentiality in research data, ensuring information provided by subjects remains private.
As I scrutinize McGrath et al.'s study, it becomes apparent that the researchers opted for a correlation-descriptive design, combining correlational and descriptive methods. The correlation aspect aims to determine associations between variables, while the descriptive method characterizes the present behavior of a particular population. The choice of research design should align with the study's objectives, and I agree with this recognition of this alignment in the study's design (Polit and Beck, 2006).
The adherence to Roscoe's Rule of Thumb for sample sizes is commendable, with the study's population of 228 falling within the recommended range of 30 to 500 (Alreck & Settle, 2010). The essay rightly emphasizes the importance of adhering to these guidelines to ensure the study's statistical reliability.
The study employs the Profile of Organizational Characteristics (POC) instrument, utilizing an 8-point Likert scale. Chomeya (2010) supports the use of an 8-point Likert scale in research with several variables, as it enhances the test's overall validity. I find the emphasis on the reliability of the instrument, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.89, indicating good reliability, to be crucial. This validation strengthens the study's methodological robustness (Chomeya et al., 2010).
The data collection process involves three distinct phases. In the first phase, a comprehensive approach includes obtaining a list of nurses, interviewing them, and orienting them to the study and the instrument. The second phase, commencing nine months later, collects data from nursing directors and head nurses about the number and reasons for nurses leaving their units. The third phase calculates nurses' retention, ensuring a comprehensive and sequential approach to data collection.
As the study proceeds to data analysis using SPSS version 11.5 for Windows, employing both descriptive and inferential statistics, I appreciate the acknowledgment of the importance of clearly defining the statistical tests undertaken and the rationale behind their selection. This transparency is crucial for replicability and understanding the study's analytical process.
To enhance readability, the study presents findings and data analyses in tabulated forms. This approach aids reviewers in assessing whether the results effectively answer the research questions. The logical flow in the discussion of findings is highlighted, emphasizing its connection to the literature review and the study's broader context.
Highlighting the significance of stating the findings within the overall strengths and limitations of the study, McGrath et al. delve into the clinical relevance of their research, offering well-stated implications. The commendation for the researchers is well-placed, acknowledging their recommendations in light of the study's conclusions, ensuring a thorough and meaningful resolution (Polit and Beck, 2006).
In conclusion, my critique of McGrath et al.'s study addresses essential elements such as the title's length, the clear presentation of the research problem, the focus on management styles and nurses' retention, the integration of the literature review and study aims, ethical considerations, methodology, sample size adherence, instrument reliability, sequential data collection, transparent data analysis, and the significance of findings. While acknowledging the study's strengths, I provide constructive criticism, emphasizing the importance of a well-defined research foundation and a seamless integration of various components to enhance the study's overall credibility and impact.
Critical Evaluation of a Nursing Research Study. (2016, Jun 08). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/a-nursing-research-critique-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
