The Social Construction of Race, Ethnicity, Class, and Gender

Categories: Slavery And Freedom

Socialization is the unequal distribution of power, wealth, income and social status between individuals and groups. This distribution is not random, it is patterned and structured. Three important axes of global inequality are gender, race and ethnicity, and class. These inequalities are on a global scale and are found in virtually all societies. It wasn't until relatively recently, however, that a caste system developed to include race and ethnicity among class and gender.

Since imperialism and the conquest of the America's, a number of social changes have occurred, and, as a result, the dominant groups today are not only higher in the social order, in terms of rank, but they are considered better as well.

According to Winant, there are two main concepts of race, "race as an ideological concept," and "race as an objective condition. " Barbara Fields, one of the main supporters and activists for the "race as an ideological concept" theory, explains the concept of race as "[a] concept [that] arose to meet an ideological need; its original effectiveness lay in its ability to reconcile freedom and slavery.

Get quality help now
Sweet V
Sweet V
checked Verified writer

Proficient in: Slavery And Freedom

star star star star 4.9 (984)

“ Ok, let me say I’m extremely satisfy with the result while it was a last minute thing. I really enjoy the effort put in. ”

avatar avatar avatar
+84 relevant experts are online
Hire writer

" Remember, Africans weren't the only slaves, Asians, for example, were slaves too. This created a distinction between the white slave owners and all other races, and this was acceptable because their slaves were lower than them, according to Fields theory, so it was okay to enslave other humans. Winant says that, "Sociopolitical circumstances change over historical time, racially defined groups? [achieve] mobility or [remain] mired in poverty, and so on. " If race is considered an objective condition it doesn't allow for the reconceptualization of race, "one simply is one's race.

Get to Know The Price Estimate For Your Paper
Topic
Number of pages
Email Invalid email

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

You won’t be charged yet!

" Most early theories of race took this stance and Stephen Jay Gould, as recently as 1981, has made similar claims. However, it is impossible to support such a theory on a number of grounds. First, it's been scientifically proven that there are more genetic differences between a single race then there are between different races. Second, it doesn't allow for any change ? certain races will always be lower than other races. There are social beliefs which are present today that place social stigmas on people who are affiliated with certain ethnicity's.

Yen Le Espiritu puts forth the argument that "The exercise of political-economic domination by racial elites always involves attempts to objectify the subordinate group" by "branding subordinate groups as alternatively inferior, threatening, or praiseworthy". An example that is taking place today is that cosmetic surgery being performed on Asian-American women, as Eugena Kaw points out in her article. In particular they are making changes to their eyes and noses to look more "ideal. " Is that okay though? Should one group's sense of ideal be forced upon another group?

Many of the Asian-American women surveyed said their reason for undergoing cosmetic surgery was to form their own personal form of beauty. But why then did these women all undergo similar surgeries to ? correct' how they look? Class is the one social construction that has existed since the beginning of history. There have always been those who "oppress" and those who are "oppressed", from the serfs and lords of the middle ages to the bourgeois and proletariat of "today" (According to Marx). The distinction of class today is different than it's been in the past though.

It used to be based on your heritage, but today it is based on capital, the more you have the higher and better you are. Many people feel that cultures that veil women, such as Muslims, make them suffer psychological and socioeconomic consequences. Homa Hoodfar discusses how the west equates veils with ignorance and oppression in her article. But throughout historic time and place, there has been "a clear division of labour in the allocation of economic tasks between men and women. " This division "has always been partly justified in terms of? biological differences.

" However, many feminists argue that "we learn, through culturally specific socialization, how to be masculine and feminine and to assume the identities of men and women. " Due to that fact that many societies proclaim masculine characteristics to be more socially ? useful' and generally ? more important' than feminine ones, a social structure often results where there are highly unequal gender relations. Even if women attain social/political rights equal to those of men it's unlikely that all the sources of oppression of women will be removed.

How is that fair?! We are more biased today than ever before, at least there was some justification during the middle ages for why women couldn't be knights. But today mental capacity should be the major basis in the workplace. Why are women so under represented in government? Why do they get paid less than 80% of what men get paid to do the same job? Why are women discriminated against today? Essentially, the social constructs of race, gender, ethnicity, and class are all the same thing.

They all are ways to divide people and put certain people on top. Not unlike capitalism where someone is on top and others are on the bottom (it's also not surprising that the way we view the four social constructs changed around the time that capitalism was being developed). Now that we have this whole "in group" "out group" view of society, can we ever go back to being color blind? Can we go back to people being distinguished based on who their allegiances are to or their character? The way we view the social constructs of society need to change.

People's arbitrary biases shouldn't prevent someone from getting a job! It's ludicrous to assume that because of the color of ones skin, or one's sex that someone is worse and lower than you. The very fact that there are still people today who see the "white man's burden" shows how backwards we really are, even in today's "modern society. " We need to stop segregating each and every individual as a collective of whites, blacks, men, women, Jews, Christians, etc. and start living as American's because that's the only way that social progress will ever be made.

Updated: Nov 01, 2022
Cite this page

The Social Construction of Race, Ethnicity, Class, and Gender. (2016, Dec 14). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/the-social-construction-of-race-ethnicity-class-and-gender-essay

The Social Construction of Race, Ethnicity, Class, and Gender essay
Live chat  with support 24/7

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

get help with your assignment