The Idea and Role Of Analogy; Deeper Understanding Or Justification

An analogy is a comparison in which an idea or a thing is compared to another thing that is quite different from it. It aims at explaining that idea or thing by comparing it to something that is familiar. Metaphors and similes are tools used to draw an analogy.. But in order to answer this question clearly, we need to define some key terms. To provide a justification means the action of showing something is right or wrong by providing reasons.

Understanding is the ability to make something more comprehensible. The two areas of knowledge that utilize analogies to provide deeper understanding or justification are Human Sciences and Religious Knowledge Systems. So essentially, I agree with reservations that an analogy’s main role is to explain and aid in providing an understanding, but also can be utilized to provide justification through analogical reasoning.

Analogies are utilized for the need to express with human words, which are used primarily to describe creatures, contents regarding the transcendent reality of God, which reason alone cannot reach and which is not an object of common human experience.

Get quality help now

Writer Lyla

Verified writer

Proficient in: Analogy

5 (876)

“ Have been using her for a while and please believe when I tell you, she never fail. Thanks Writer Lyla you are indeed awesome ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

In religion, people use analogies to simplify foreignideas or beliefs to allow believers to have an easier means of understanding. For example, the Bible is utlized in Christianity as Quran is utilized in Islam. This analogy provides a deeper understanding on what importance holy books hold in a religious entity. Therefore, Christians can understand that the Quran is as equally important to the Muslims as the Bible is to themselves.

This analogy aids in the understanding of complex religious ideas by simplifying them and breaking them down. Furthermore, when Within the religious entity of Christianity, Jesus spoke in “parables” rather frequently to describe the reality of the Kingdom with effective and coherent images, in order to make it more understandable to his audience. The use of images and metaphors establishes a simile between a known reality and an unknown or difficult to understand one, allowing the transposition of properties and relations from the better known to the lesser known image. The parable is often told in the form of a story whose argumentative force consists in the narration of a fact (a fictitious but true-to-life fact) so the audience can understand well, and through which the audience can draw logical conclusions. Such conclusions, based off analogy, can be then applied to the initially unknown reality so as to understand some of its most importance.

The use of analogies to establish relationships between ideas can allow people to use their own emotional attitude about certain situations to aid in the process of understanding. However, In order to simplify a religions mostly foreign reality of beliefs, analogies are also used to form analogical reasoning to provide justification through reasoning. These justifications use emotion to appeal to the masses and attract them with the use of reasons to manipulate an individual’s emotional attitude about a particular idea. The Analogical dispute for considering is most common when utilized inside the recommendation of a cleverly designer or an adroitly producer. The first prevalent analogical method of reasoning is the teleological dispute for creation & arrange. Teleological disputes are arrange disputes that expect that given this introduction, the nearness of a designer can be substantiated and frequently shown as a Liberal God. It is the dispute for arrangement of the universe, and the maker, -the Majestic God who made it.

Cultural comparison has clearly come to play an important role in building archaeological theories about social relations, economies, belief systems and so on – theories that can be translated across contexts. Such comparison of practices or relationships avoids a continued reliance on social evolutionary narratives, providing a sound basis for exploring cultural phenomena which appear across social types and in many different cultural contexts or social types. Cultural analogies can be portrayed through the Onion Model of Culture. The Onion Model of Culture shows how culture has a number of layers. There are a number of interpretations of this model but the simplest one consists of four key layers.The outer layers represent cultural artefacts or symbols such as flags, architecture or traditional clothing. Heroes make up the next layer, and tend to represent many of the culture’s values and beliefs. The next layer is composed of common rituals and traditions. This could include how people greet each other, eat meals, get married or practice their religion.In the centre of the onion are the underlying values and cultural assumptions which influence all of the other layers. These beliefs, norms and attitudes are much harder to recognise without a deeper analysis and thorough understanding of each of these layers and how they interact. This model is a wholesome representation of an analogy and how models are used to idealize concepts that are difficult to conceptualize without a tool to compare it with a similar idea or concept to make the process of understanding easier. However, this model’s each layer could also be providing different reasons to use emotional connections within culture to be providing justifications for why and how these different cultural representations are used and how effective they are. These reasonings intensifies an individual’s emotional response and perception of complex ideas and makes their ability to comprehend the justifications better. An individual’s emotion allows them to have different reactions to the analogies creating their individualistic opinions on whether the analogy is providing them a better understanding or justifications for their reasoning.

We use social analogies to form heuristics that can provide us with information to guide us through investigation. In Human Sciences, to transform complex and foriegn concepts into known and identifiable concepts, analogies are used. In society, comparisons are used daily to form connections between people or similar situations to broaden the feeling of belonging. Emotion and Reasoning are used to form these connections through analogical reasoning. According to David Hume, analogies Analogy compares two things on the basis of their similarities and as a result, this allows us to draw conclusions about the objects. The more closely each ideas resembles each other, the more accurate the conclusion. The dependence of both logical models and allegories, upon perceptions of the distinguishable universe is illustrated to be based upon the human prerequisite for relationship of a person’s conduct of behavior. The utilization of, as well as the refinement between the analogy and the representation of substance in the process of communicating these analogical discoveries. The built up (i.e., the confirmed and affirmed) inter-connexions among extant and advancing models and representations become in this manner the basis of human information. Researchers depend on allegory and similarity to create a sense of logical revelations and communicate their discoveries to each other and to the open-minded.

However, in spite of their utility, allegories can too oblige logical thinking, contribute to open errors, and, at times, incidentally strengthen generalizations and messages that weaken the objectives of comprehensive science. This connects to how metaphorical and analogical reasoning can reversely be also utilized for justifications. Researchers routinely lock in in analogical thinking to create speculations and interpret results, which they depend intensely to make representations in order to communicate perceptions and discoveries. On the other hand, non experts make sense of, and contextualize, theoretical thoughts and foreigninformation through the utilization of representations. Whereas irreplaceable heuristic devices for doing, communicating, and understanding science, representations can moreover hinder logical processing, fortify mistaken assumptions, and propagate unintended social and political messages. For these reasons, it is particularly vital for researchers, science communicators, and science teachers to recognize the conceptual, social, and political measurements of representations in science and receive basic points of view on their utilize and impacts. Analogical reasoning such as using it for the justification of the importance of climate change through the comparison of climate change to a medical disease. An example that portrays an effective analogy to justify the necessity of taking action for climate change is Risks with a person’s health are often caused or aggravated by human behavior is to climate change getting worse if we don't do something about it. This representation of comparing two similar situations that use emotional appeal of using health and disease and logical reasoning of using the risks of not doing anything effectively provides an accurate analogy to justify why actions should be taken towards climate change.

As humans, we have a fundamental desire to group similar things to form comparisons and connections to aid in understanding and provide justifications. Through religious comparisons of unimaginable ideas of god and power to basic ideas to provide a deeper analysis of a religious concept and using analogies in daily life to compare two simple ideas assists an individual to grasp a profound understanding of a foreign concept. However, analogies are also used to manipulate emotions through analogical reasoning to justify an idea. Religious justifications such as the rationale of the existence of a godly being also employs analogies through arguments to logically construct an idea which manipulates a person’s ideologies. Society also employs the use of analogies to justify their views of actions that are deemed right versus wrong to form a fundamental basis of values. The multiple roles of analogies in life allows the thorough use of them throughout many areas of knowledge.