To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
For centuries, people have indulged in the habit of smoking cigarettes without fully grasping the magnitude of its detrimental effects on health. However, recent awareness has shed light on the severe risks associated with smoking, prompting a crucial discussion on the necessity of making smoking in public places illegal. This essay explores various aspects, presenting a compelling argument for the implementation of legal measures to protect public health.
Smoking cigarettes poses a myriad of health risks to the smoker, including the development of serious conditions such as lung cancer, emphysema, and heart disease.
The immediate impact on the smoker's well-being is evident, and the subsequent sections delve into the broader repercussions on non-smokers who are involuntarily exposed to the harmful effects of cigarette smoke.
One of the primary arguments against smoking in public places is the unjust impact on non-smokers. It is not only the smoker who bears the brunt of these health risks; innocent bystanders who happen to be exposed to secondhand smoke face similar, if not worse, consequences.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Why Cigarettes Should Be Illegal
5 (876)
“ Have been using her for a while and please believe when I tell you, she never fail. Thanks Writer Lyla you are indeed awesome ”
The disparity in health outcomes raises ethical concerns, forming the basis for the assertion that smoking in public places endangers people's lives.
The evidence linking secondhand smoke to severe health issues is compelling and supported by reputable groups such as the US Surgeon General's office, the National Research Council, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Studies consistently demonstrate that individuals exposed to secondhand smoke face a 150% increased likelihood of developing lung cancer.
Furthermore, the alarming statistics reveal the magnitude of the issue, with about 47,000 deaths from heart disease and 3,000 deaths from lung cancer attributed to secondhand smoke, making it the third leading cause of preventable death in the country.
Secondhand smoke does not discriminate; its effects extend to vulnerable populations, particularly infants and young children. The consequences manifest in approximately 300,000 cases of lower respiratory tract infections, including bronchitis and pneumonia, in these innocent individuals. Despite their choice not to smoke, these individuals suffer health implications comparable to, if not exceeding, those faced by smokers.
Cigarette smoke contains around 300 dangerous chemicals, further underscoring the need for stringent measures to protect public health. Attempting to contain these harmful substances within designated smoking sections would require impractical levels of ventilation, posing logistical and environmental challenges. This emphasizes the urgency of creating smoke-free environments in all public places.
Despite initial apprehensions, numerous places in the United States have successfully implemented smoking bans, yielding positive outcomes. Notable examples include 85% of the nation's shopping malls adopting smoke-free policies and municipalities like Princeton borough and township leading the way by outlawing smoking in almost all public places, including bars and restaurants. These success stories serve as compelling precedents for wider adoption of such measures across the nation.
Contrary to concerns about potential negative effects on businesses, evidence indicates that smoke-free ordinances contribute positively to the economy. Even in tobacco-producing states like North Carolina, the implementation of smoking bans has not adversely affected businesses. Studies conducted in various states, including California and Arizona, consistently demonstrate the favorable impact of smoke-free regulations, with examples such as a 4% increase in sales in Massachusetts's smoke-free restaurants.
The majority of Americans support and benefit from clean indoor air laws. Polls indicate that 86% of the population approves of the Clean Indoor Air Act, highlighting the widespread acknowledgment of its positive impact. Furthermore, the implementation of such laws has resulted in significant behavioral changes among smokers, with polls revealing that 2.8 million out of 46 million smokers express willingness to quit if a national ban is enforced. Over time, this would lead to a substantial decline in cigarette consumption, potentially saving millions of lives.
While smokers exercise their right to make choices about their lives, it is imperative to acknowledge and protect the rights of non-smokers. Clean indoor air regulations aim to create environments where individuals can pursue a healthy lifestyle without being subjected to harmful substances. Banning smoking in all public places becomes a necessary step to ensure the well-being of millions of innocent lives affected by secondhand smoke.
Smoking, a known killer, demands proactive measures to safeguard public health. While individuals who choose to smoke understand the associated risks, non-smokers have the right to live in an environment free from harmful substances. Banning smoking in all public places emerges as a straightforward and effective solution that can prevent millions of unnecessary deaths. It is a call to action, urging society to prioritize the health and well-being of all its members.
Smoking in Public Places: A Call for Legal Prohibition. (2022, Feb 15). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/smoking-in-public-places-should-be-illegal-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
