To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Was NAFTA beneficial to Texas? Explain your answer. You must pick a side. Answers that hedge will not be graded.
The North American Free Trade Agreement, also known as NAFTA, is a trade treaty among the United States, Canada, and Mexico to lower and eliminate tariffs among the three countries. Was NAFTA beneficial to Texas·? I believe most of the effects caused by NAFTA has been bad for Texas.
There were several significant accomplishments in the movement toward free trade with Mexico and Canada, including massive failures.
Studies have found that the creation of NAFTA has seen job loss in the United States and an increase of undocumented workers. Texas lost 55,000 jobs, which were lost to Mexico because of the cheap labor (Champagne 19).
Because of NAFTA, 683,000 jobs have been lost in the United States according to a 2011 study in the Economic Policy institute. Of the 683,000 jobs, three-fifths of them came from manufacturing.
Most policymakers in Texas continue to accept the idea that expanding trade with Mexico and other countries is a good thing.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Constitution
5 (893)
“ Thank you so much for accepting my assignment the night before it was due. I look forward to working with you moving forward ”
This idea comes with a major problem that we are facing right now. The issue is having a free flow of people crossing the border.
Though NAFTA wasn't beneficial to Texas, not everything NAFTA did was bad. Though there were some losses in the movement toward free trade with Mexico and Canada there were also big wins. Texas exports totaled 279.7 billion to 207 billion in the year 2012, 17.7% of all U.S exports were from Texas, Mexico was the top importer of Texas exports at about 101 billion in 2013 and increasing from 7.7 billion in 2012, and finally Canada's imports from Texas totaled 25.9 billion in 2013 rising from 18.8 billion in 2010. The above statistics is from the year 2013. This is to help put into view of Texas's International trade with Mexico and Canada (19).
NAFTA is supposed to be an all parties benefit type of agreement, a win, win situation if I'd say so, but turns out the Standard and Poor's study showed that Mexico has benefited from the agreement more so than Canada or the United States.
Over the years NAFTA has had a negative and a positive impact on Texas.
Explain how the structure of Texas government resembles the structure of the U.S. government. Why is this the case? Provide specific examples of the resemblance.
Texas founding encompassed a number of phases of constitutional governments. These phases stretched from 1936 when Texas declared itself an independent republic in the year 1876. This was also around the time of reconstruction after the Civil War came to an end and a new state constitution was put into play, current Texas (Champagne 47).
The Texas Constitution is meant to provide a rigid structure for government leaving no room for interpretation, also known as a strict constitution. The United States Constitution is known as a loose constitution. The document is meant to only provide a basic structure to the government (47). For instances both constitutions have a Bill of Rights, separation of power with checks and balances contains individual rights and states how government works.
During this time after Texas had declared itself independent from Mexico, they looked up towards the United States which have been independent of Great Britain for quite some time now and looked at their working and living constitution. They adopted their constitution after the United States.
The Texas Bill of Rights has a more detailed addition against the restrictions of freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of speech and freedom of peaceful assembly. The Texas Bill of Rights and the United States Bill of Rights isn't at all that different. Certain portions of each constitution are almost the same. Search and seizure. They both state that "no person's properties can be searched or seized without a legal warrant to do so (THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 1. BILL OF RIGHTS)."
The Texas and United States Constitution both have a separation of power. These are shown by their Judicial, Executive and Legislative branches.
The Texas and United States constitutions both have individual rights such as, "Right to Bear Arms" Found in the Texas constitution (THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 1. BILL OF RIGHTS). "Bearing Arms" found in the United States Constitution. is found in both constitutions (Baltzell-Article II).
Both constitutions have many differences, but they are all in their own way. Texas is "special" and has differences that the rest of the country might not understand. With one of the longest state constitutions, it is safe to conclude that "everything is bigger in Texas."
Compare and contrast categorical grants to block grants. Be sure include which forms of federalism are associated with each type of grant.
Block grants are federal grants to states with only general provisions as to how the money should be spent, whereas categorical grants are specific in putting restrictions on exactly how the statehood should use the money.
During the presidency of Roosevelt America was not doing do well. She faced the Great Depression and then World War II. At this time the relations between the national and state government had changed tremendously. Federalism was changed to what we called marble-cake federalism. This is where the boundaries between the national government and state government get crossed. Prior to this, the marble-cake federalism was known as cooperative federalism this is where national and state governments worked together to provide services. Often this was done by joint funding of programs or state administration of programs mostly funded by the national government.
Programs such as The Social Security Act provided a system of benefits for workers who were old, benefits for industrial accidents, insurance for unemployment, aid for dependent mothers and their children, the blind and the handicapped. The federal government would make money available to states that established their own programs in these areas provided that they met the specific guidelines, this was the basic model of these programs (Champagne 94).
During President Lyndon B. Johnsons Great Society, new programs were added to the Social Security act. Medicare was established to provide health insurance for the elderly. Later Medicaid was added to provide health care funding for people enrolled in state-federal Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) (96).
During Richard Nixon's term as president, he tried a somewhat different version of federalism, it was called the New Federalism. This was Nixon's attempt to reduce federal control, he introduced block grants (96). New Federalism's biggest success was during Bill Clinton's administration when major reforms were passed in welfare programs that gave the states a significant decision-making role. By the 1990s the liberals and conservatives were in agreement that welfare in America was broken. Replacing the state-federal system with a system of grants tied federal regulations and guidelines lay at the heart of the Clinton welfare reforms.
NAFTA beneficial to Texas?. (2019, Dec 05). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/rhianne-garner-mr-jordantexas-gov1312019chapter-1was-nafta-example-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
