Approaches For A Job Evaluation

This essay will discuss the net present worth (NPV), repayment period (PBP) and internal rate of return (IRR) approaches for a job evaluation. It is typically said that NPV is the very best technique financial investment appraisal, which I why I will compare the strengths and weak points of NPV in addition to the 2 others to se if the statement is in fact true. Intro To begin of, the essay will attempt to describe the theoretical rationale of the net present worth technique to investment appraisal along with its strengths and weaknesses.

From there, introduce the payback period approach and after that internal rate of return approach, as well as to consider their strengths and weak points. After describing and discussing the 3 different approaches, it will finish up with comparing the different 3 and in a conclusion. NPV Net present value or NPV is a technique used to figure out the worth of a financial investment today (present) compared to the worth of the investment in the future after taking the inflation and return into account.

Get quality help now

Marrie pro writer

Verified writer

Proficient in: Business Management

5 (204)

“ She followed all my directions. It was really easy to contact her and respond very fast as well. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

In simpler words, it compares the worth of 1 pound today with the exact same pound in the future. Net present worth is utilized in capital budgeting to evaluate the profitability of a financial investment. It is typically determined using tables and spreadsheets such as Microsoft Excel, however the primary formula utilized to determine net present worth looks like this: Where C0 = Cash outflow at time t=0 Ct = Cash inflow sometimes t r = The discount rate As Ross (2013) states in his book, a job ought to be accepted if the NPV is greater than absolutely no and turned down if it is less than zero.

This is known as the NPV guideline. However, if the NPV is equal to zero, the manager of the business has to choose whether to accept or reject depending upon a number of elements, such as there might be a better financial investment to be made elsewhere that may produce greater revenue. It will be a concern of chance cost. The entire point of the rule is that if a company accepts a financial investment with positive net present value, it will benefit the investors, as the worth of the firm will increase (thinking about no other scenarios) by the quantity of the NPV.

This is called additivity, which means that the value of the firm is simply the value of the different divisions, projects, or other entities within the firm. Alexander (2000) states that any financial asset with an NPV greater than zero is referred to as underpriced, while any financial asset with an NPV less than zero is said to be overprices. A firm or company must always consider is the concept of ‘time value of money’ (TVM). TMV means that if ? 1 is invested today, say for instance in a bank or a fund, with an interest rate of 5 per cent per annum, in one year it will be ? 1. 05 because the bank compensates the investors for borrowing their money. The same would be if you reverse the equation. ?1 in a year with the same interest rate of 5 per cent equals ? 0. 9524 today (Weetman, 2010). The reason for discounting future cash flows according to Marney (2011) are because of three factors; inflation, risk and time impatience.

In all countries there is some level of inflation that needs to be accounted for. It can lead to both higher and lower purchasing power of money. Risk is very hard du make accurate predictions for in the far future, and after the credit crunch of 2007-2008, very few dare to make them on variables like inflation and interest rates. Lastly is the factor of time impatience. Since mankind is born with some level of greed, people prefer money now rather than later. This can easily be reflected by the use of credit cards and loans in general.

And as long as people want to lend and borrow, there is money to be made for lenders, as incentives are required with the gratification in the form of interest. The main advantage with the net present value technique according to Ross (2013) is that is uses cash flows, it includes all the cash flows of the project and that it rightly discounts the cash flows properly. The positive aspect of it using cash flows is that it determines when the project will earn its incomes, how soon they will come as well as how sizable they are going to be.

What is meant when he states that it uses all the cash flows is that it acknowledges every single cash flow, regardless of the date or the size. The advantage for the shareholders of the firm is that it shows how much they can expect to get back from an investment as it takes into account the riskiness of the project and doesn’t ignore the time value of money. However, the NPV approach those have some disadvantages as well. The main disadvantage to the net present value approach is that it is sensitive to discount rates.

The computations of NPV are a summary of multiple discounted cash flows that are converted into present value terms for the same point in time. This could affect the result both positively and negatively, and as said earlier, it is almost impossible to predict what the future brings. Let’s use the example given in the article “Uses, abuses and alternatives to NPV” by Ross (1995). If the current interest rate leads to a negative NPV, but in the future the interest rate decreases and leads to a positive NPV.

The management or analyzers may miss out on a good investment opportunity if they sell the project early because with the current interest rate it is considered not profitable. Another example, let’s call it project a, could be if we were trying to value an investment that could cost your firm ? 10,000 up front today and was expected to pay you back ? 2,500 in annual profits for 5 years. This will lead to a total nominal amount of ? 12,500, beginning at the end of the first year. If we use a 4.5 per cent discount rate in the NPV calculations, the five payments of ? 2,500 equals to ? 10,974. 94 of todays pounds. If we subtract the initial payment of ? 10,000, we’re left with a net present value of ? 974. 94. Now let’s try to do use the same number with the same length of a project, but use 9 per cent discount rate and call it project b. The firm will get a payment of ? 9,724. 13, which means they’ll have a NPV of considerably less, and will in fact end up loosing ? 275. 87 when the project is finished.