Morality As Anti-Nature

Friedrich Nietzsche, a prominent German theorist in the 19th century is one of the most well-read thinkers of the past two-centuries. His concepts concerning morality and nature continue to be gone over and discussed to this day amongst scholars of all beliefs.

All living things are provided desires by nature. These desires exist as part of who we are. They define us in such a way; they can aid us and they can likewise do us great harm. The primary sin of Pride, for example, can be an advantage, to have pride in yourself and your abilities, and be able to brag about them might be what stands in between you and another person making an application for the very same job.

However according to the Bible, it is a sin. So the other person might have the moral high ground, but you will wind up with the job. Which is better? Just you can decide that for yourself.

Another way to take a look at it is this.

Get quality help now

writer-marian

Verified writer

Proficient in: Nietzsche

4.8 (309)

“ Writer-marian did a very good job with my paper, she got straight to the point, she made it clear and organized ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

You have a terrific passion for reading, but morality states that reading is evil. So you deny yourself the satisfaction of a good book, publication article or perhaps a street sign in order to follow what another person has considered to be a values. You are rejecting your real self, for no other function, but to be accepted in society. In your heart, and in your mind, you know that reading is no more evil that breathing, however since society has actually informed you in a different way, you ignore truth.

To Nietzsche, denying your own enthusiasms resembles rejecting reality. If your passions were a tiger, a strong guy would catch the tiger and tame it. A weak man would a minimum of run away. However it is only a fool who pretends that the tiger doesn't exist. The best of moralities are those that accomodate nature ... the weakest of moralities are those that reject it.

Even though many people at the time truly believed that the church provided them a great direction in life, Nietzsche strongly disagreed. Nietzsche believed that following a religion is to ignore the very nature of humanity. He believed that man is born naturally good, proposing that the church should not be followed in order for humans to allow their passions be presented in themselves as they desire. Throughout his writings, Nietzsche aims to inform his readers that we as humans can only reach our potential by following our passions and ignoring the flawed ideals of the church. Under the doctrine of the church’s morality, innate passions of its followers must be abolished in order to become proper Christians. By destroying the inner passions of its followers, the church is doing a great disfavor by using morality to rule out nature from their lives.

When someone begins to follow the ideals of the church, they are introduced with the doctrine of the idea of free will. Basically, this concept claims that even if God is an all righteous and all powerful being, only “his” followers have the ultimate responsibility for their actions. As human beings, we have a certain weakness to make great mistakes. This is where Nietzsche claimed that there is a case of cause and effect. At the time of his writing, Friedrich Nietzsche saw that when events were not proven scientifically, followers of the church were very naïve to credit an act of God rather than searching for the answers differently.

Christianity had become the enemy of life and nature and the church has stifled its followers by turning them into closed minded and weak humans. Nietzsche ultimately believed that religion creates a concept of anti-natural morality which damages our development as humans quite severely, eventually ending our status and rights as individuals once the church gets involved.

Nietzsche believed that the church is at war with the passionate and the intelligent in favor of the poor and spirited. He believed that the ones who began the mental and spiritual decapitations of others are truly the ones who were unable to control their passions and were very ill willed. The people of the church who imposed morality as anti-nature were the ones who were unable to impose moderation in their lives. He believed that an immoralist is an ideal human being, because they are the ones who truly understand the rights and wrongs in life by applying passions and a chosen lifestyle that best coincides with their lives.