To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
The early 1900s bore witness to a profound and tumultuous clash of ideologies, pitting Fundamentalist beliefs against the emerging forces of Modernism. This ideological battleground, fraught with differences in opinions and values, manifested in various socio-political events that underscored the struggle between tradition and progress. Key issues, including the rise of the Ku Klux Klan (KKK), the landmark Scopes trial, the infamous Sacco and Vanzetti trial, and the Prohibition movement, reflected the deeply entrenched conflict between Fundamentalism and Modernism. As the clash unfolded, it became evident that Fundamentalism, while resolute in its convictions, would ultimately yield ground to the inexorable march of scientific advancements and evolving societal norms.
The emergence of the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) serves as a poignant symbol of the ideological clash between Fundamentalist and Modernist values.
The KKK, predominantly concentrated in the Midwest and the Bible Belt, was a formidable force led by figures such as the Imperial Wizard, Grand Goblins, and King Kleagles.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Modernism
5 (234)
“ Very organized ,I enjoyed and Loved every bit of our professional interaction ”
At its core, the KKK espoused Fundamentalist beliefs, vehemently denouncing Modernist ideas such as evolution and societal progress, particularly in areas like alcohol consumption and birth control "experiments."
The KKK's stance was characterized by a potent mix of nativism, isolationism, Protestantism, pro-aggression, and pro-Anglo-Saxon sentiments. This fervent adherence to old values and xenophobic tendencies marked the Klan as a bastion of Fundamentalism. Notably, the Klan was anti-Catholic, anti-Jewish, anti-black, and anti-Communist, illustrating the depth of its Fundamentalist convictions. The rise of the KKK symbolized the clash between the rigid principles of Fundamentalism and the evolving, inclusive ideals of Modernism.
The KKK's influence extended beyond mere ideological differences; it manifested in violent actions, reflecting the extreme lengths to which Fundamentalists were willing to go to protect their beliefs.
However, the zenith of the KKK's power was short-lived. Exposed pyramid schemes and internal scandals led to a sharp decline in its membership and the subsequent demise of its public and widespread existence. The collapse of the KKK underscored the inability of extreme Fundamentalist ideologies to withstand scrutiny and maintain a foothold in the face of societal progress.
The Scopes trial, also known as the "Monkey Trial," stands out as a pivotal moment in the clash between Fundamentalism and Modernism. This high-profile legal battle unfolded in Dayton, Tennessee, with John T. Scopes, a science teacher, facing charges for teaching evolution, a concept that contradicted Fundamentalist creationism. The trial, which took place in 1925, became a lightning rod for the broader debate over the role of education and the compatibility of religious beliefs with scientific advancements.
Educational progress in the early 1900s, buoyed by initiatives like the Rockefeller Foundation's efforts to eradicate diseases like hookworm, and the advocacy of experiential learning by educational reformer John Dewey, set the stage for conflict. John T. Scopes became the face of Modernism, challenging Fundamentalist notions by introducing his students to the revolutionary ideas of Darwinism and modern science.
The trial's intensity was amplified by the presence of two formidable legal figures—William Jennings Bryan, representing Fundamentalist interests, and Clarence Darrow, a staunch advocate for Modernism. The trial resulted in Scopes being fined, ostensibly a victory for Fundamentalism. However, the trial's proceedings and the eloquence of Clarence Darrow served to highlight the irrationality of the Fundamentalist position, contributing to a public awakening to the ideas of Modernism. The Scopes trial became a turning point, crystallizing the clash of ideologies in the public consciousness.
The Sacco and Vanzetti trial, a legal saga that unfolded over six years, exemplified the clash between Fundamentalist nativism and Modernistic ideals. Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti, two Italian immigrants, were wrongly accused of murdering a Massachusetts paymaster and guard. The trial, plagued by racial bias, anti-immigrant sentiments, and Fundamentalist uprisings, reflected the broader societal tensions of the time.
The prevailing nativism and anti-foreign sentiments, bred by Fundamentalist ideologies and fears of Communist influence, led to the unjust conviction of Sacco and Vanzetti. The jury's prejudices against the defendants, based on their Italian heritage, atheism, anarchism, and draft-dodging, resulted in their electrocution. The trial's aftermath provided a rallying point for Modernists, highlighting the dangers of Fundamentalist-driven biases and prejudices. Sacco and Vanzetti became martyrs for those who sought to discredit Fundamentalists as proponents of injustice and racial discrimination.
The Prohibition movement, marked by the Volstead Act and the Eighteenth Amendment, became a battleground for Fundamentalist moral values against Modernist cultural practices. Anti-German sentiments following World War I contributed to the initial push for Prohibition, as many beer companies were owned by German-Americans. The movement gained traction in the South and West but faced opposition from immigrants in the East, who viewed alcohol as a cultural privilege.
Fundamentalists championed Prohibition as a means of upholding righteous lives, aligning with their teetotalism and Protestant ideals. While the movement achieved relative success, with increased bank savings and decreased absenteeism, it encountered significant challenges in enforcement. Modernists resisted the restrictions on alcohol, viewing them as an infringement on personal freedoms. The cultural significance of alcohol, particularly in social events and immigrant life, proved resilient against Fundamentalist attempts to impose moral values through legislation.
The Prohibition era ultimately came to an end with the passage of the Twenty-First Amendment, repealing the Eighteenth Amendment. This repeal reflected the triumph of Modernist resistance and a recognition of the impracticality of enforcing moral values through legislative means. The clash between Fundamentalism and Modernism in the Prohibition movement highlighted the complexities of societal change and the limitations of rigid moralistic approaches.
In conclusion, the clash between Fundamentalism and Modernism in the early 1900s shaped a transformative era in American history. The rise of the KKK, the Scopes trial, the Sacco and Vanzetti trial, and the Prohibition movement served as poignant markers of this ideological struggle. While Fundamentalism held fervently to its beliefs in creationism, nativism, and traditional values, Modernism embraced evolution and scientific progress.
These competing ideologies, often manifested in high-profile events, reflected clashes of religion, ethnicity, origin, and beliefs. The rise and fall of the KKK symbolized the limits of extreme Fundamentalist ideologies, while the Scopes trial and Sacco and Vanzetti trial exposed the irrationality and biases inherent in Fundamentalist positions. The Prohibition movement, though initially successful, ultimately succumbed to the resilient cultural practices embedded in Modernist America.
The clash of Fundamentalism and Modernism, while bitter and at times tumultuous, played a crucial role in shaping the evolving cultural landscape of the United States. The eventual triumph of Modernism underscored the resilience of scientific progress and inclusive ideals over rigid and exclusionary beliefs. As America moved into the mid-20th century, the echoes of this clash continued to reverberate, leaving an indelible mark on the nation's identity and the ongoing dialogue between tradition and progress.
The Clash of Ideologies: Fundamentalism vs. Modernism in the Early 1900s. (2016, Sep 27). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/fundamentalism-vs-modernism-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
