Functionalism in Architecture and Machine Aesthetics

Categories: Architecture

Functionalism in Architecture was a movement during the late 19th century and early 20th century. Defined to have stripped architecture of existence of ornamentation so that a structure simply expressed its purpose or function. This movement was an influential factor for modern architecture. Both in the United States and in Europe, functionalism and machine aesthetics became existent due to the development of the era. During the 1920s and early 1930s in the United States, there was a growing machine-driven culture. The machine's influence on art and architecture reflected the machine's proliferation as a valuable form of aesthetic.

Both Functionalism and machine aesthetics held its own influence in modern architecture. By utilizing these aspects, the ornamentation and excessive forms of designs were obliterated and instead replaced by a more plain but functional look. Despite the growing movement of functionalism and machine aesthetics during the early 20th century, there still lie the differences and comparisons between the utilizations, views, and ideas about them from America and Europe.

Get quality help now
Writer Lyla
Writer Lyla
checked Verified writer

Proficient in: Architecture

star star star star 5 (876)

“ Have been using her for a while and please believe when I tell you, she never fail. Thanks Writer Lyla you are indeed awesome ”

avatar avatar avatar
+84 relevant experts are online
Hire writer

The difference of the two places somehow manifested various approaches towards the topic.

AMERICAN

The functionalist movement was a product of one American architect, who coined the term “form follows function”, Louis Henri Sullivan. His works reflected the essence of functionalism. He believed that the exterior of an office building should reflect its interior structure and its interior functions. Ornament must be inspired from Nature, instead of from the past's classical architecture. One of these works that would count as much as any other building would probably be the Wrainwright Building.

Get to Know The Price Estimate For Your Paper
Topic
Number of pages
Email Invalid email

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

You won’t be charged yet!

The transition of American architecture was not that difficult because of the Americans' openness with regards to new ideas.

Functionalism and Machine aesthetics was embraced by the country leading towards a more modern approach of architecture.

EUROPEAN

One European architect, German to be exact, but practiced in America, also coined one term that reflects the essence of the movement of functionalism. “Less is more. ” Mies came up with this phrase attesting to the functional views about modern architecture. During the year 1923 he worked in Weimar, Germany and started his career of producing revolutionary simplified detailed structures that met with Sullivan's goal of implicit architectural beauty.

His work on the 860-880 Lake Shore Drive Apartments which were named as “Glass House Apartments” exemplified beauty and simplicity, the essentials of functionalism. During the late-1920s Germany served as the most important source of influential development, but the ideas for Functionalistic structures and housing developments were too advanced that time for the political and social climate in Finland. Many other European countries later on supported Functionalism but it was never easy due to the more traditionalist views of Europeans.

CONCLUSION

The American approach towards functionalism and machine aesthetics were much free than in Europe. Europeans' traditionalist views and their take on classicism somehow undermined the overall utilization of functionalism and machine aesthetics. In America, the skyscrapers were eventually accepted and the simplicity of design was taken into wide consideration. This simple and functional approach towards design spearheaded the modernist movement, almost completely erasing traditionalist and classicist architecture.

This movement that was headed by Sullivan and carried on by the likes of Le Corbusier, Mies Van Der Rohe and other architects, has become a controversial topic until today. Arguments still arise with regards to the concept of function over design.

WORKS CITED

  1. Lewis, Michael. “Louis Sullivan after Functionalism”. New Criterion, 20, 1, 2001. Jones, Cranston. Architecture Today and Tomorrow. New York: Mcgraw-Hill, 1961.
  2. Whittick, Arnold. European Architecture in the Twentieth Century. Volume: 2. London: Crosby Lockwood & Son, 1953.
Updated: Feb 23, 2021
Cite this page

Functionalism in Architecture and Machine Aesthetics. (2016, Dec 10). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/functionalism-in-architecture-and-machine-aesthetics-essay

Functionalism in Architecture and Machine Aesthetics essay
Live chat  with support 24/7

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

get help with your assignment