To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
William Jaeger, proprietor of Freemark Abbey Winery, is facing a pivotal decision regarding the harvest of his Riesling grapes. The looming threat of an impending rainstorm adds an element of uncertainty to his choice, introducing the potential for substantial impacts on the quality and profitability of his wine. With an annual production of 1,000 cases (12,000 bottles) of Riesling, Mr. Jaeger is navigating the complex decision of whether to opt for an immediate harvest or take the gamble with the approaching rainstorm.
Harvest immediately: Choosing the least risky option involves harvesting the grapes immediately.
This guarantees a profit of $34,200, derived from selling the wine at a fixed rate of $2.85 per bottle.
Do not harvest, no storm: In the absence of a storm, leaving the grapes to mature on the vine offers three potential outcomes influenced by chance. The likelihood of sugar content retention is as follows: 25% - 40%, resulting in a wine priced at $3.50 per bottle; 20% - 40%, yielding $3.00 per bottle; and less than 19%, leading to varying qualities and returns.
Do not harvest, storm with no mold: If the storm fails to bring the required mold, two sub-options emerge.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Case Study
4.7 (346)
“ This writer never make an mistake for me always deliver long before due date. Am telling you man this writer is absolutely the best. ”
Thinned wine can be sold at $2.00 per bottle, or the grapes can be sold in bulk, both providing varying returns. The Expected Monetary Value (EMV) for this scenario is calculated at $19,350.
Do not harvest, storm comes, mold present: The most optimistic scenario envisions the storm carrying the necessary mold, resulting in higher-quality wine. Priced at $8.00 per bottle wholesale, the profit margin is $67,200, considering a 30% reduction in production due to decreased grape juice.
The EMV for this scenario is estimated at $38,490.
EMV of not harvesting: Considering all potential scenarios, the overall EMV of choosing not to harvest stands at $38,745. This incorporates the possibilities of the storm happening and not happening, with a balanced 50-50 chance.
The decision-making process for Mr. Jaeger involves a delicate balance of risks and rewards, where each potential outcome carries its unique set of challenges and opportunities.
Opting for an immediate harvest presents a seemingly safer choice for Mr. Jaeger. The certainty of $34,200 in profit is enticing, offering a straightforward and guaranteed return on his investment. However, this approach overlooks the potential for higher-quality wine that could be obtained if he were to weather the storm.
The conservative approach of an immediate harvest might secure a stable profit, but it does not account for the possibility of an extraordinary return if the rainstorm brings the desired mold. Mr. Jaeger must weigh the security of a known profit against the allure of a potentially more significant financial gain.
On the other hand, choosing to wait for the storm introduces an element of uncertainty. The gamble lies in the hope that the rainstorm will carry the mold, enhancing the grapes' sugar content and, subsequently, the quality of the wine produced. While this decision entails higher risk, the potential rewards are substantial.
The analysis suggests that Mr. Jaeger might make a higher profit or, at the very least, break even by waiting to harvest. The odds are seemingly in his favor, tipping the scales toward a more patient and potentially lucrative approach.
Do not harvest, no storm - The Dance of Probability: In the absence of a storm, Mr. Jaeger's decision not to harvest allows the grapes to mature, presenting a dance of probability in potential outcomes. The chances of retaining 25% of sugar content stand at 40%, resulting in a wine priced at $3.50 per bottle. A slightly lower but still substantial chance of 20% exists, producing a wine valued at $3.00 per bottle. However, there is a risk associated with a less than 19% retention, leading to a thinner wine that generates a lower return than an immediate harvest.
These probabilities highlight the intricate nature of winemaking decisions. Mr. Jaeger must navigate the delicate balance between patience and potential loss, considering the nuanced interplay of weather, grape maturity, and market demand.
Do not harvest, storm with no mold - Unforeseen Consequences: If the storm arrives without bringing the desired mold, Mr. Jaeger faces unforeseen consequences. The rainstorm, while not enhancing the sugar content, increases the juice in the grapes by 7.5%. This, however, leads to a dilemma: should he sell the thinned wine for $2.00 per bottle or opt for selling the grapes in bulk, generating only half the profit compared to selling the wine?
The unpredictability of the weather introduces a level of complexity that requires Mr. Jaeger to make a strategic decision. While neither option is particularly enticing, they represent the inherent risks involved in winemaking, where external factors can significantly impact outcomes.
Do not harvest, storm comes, mold present - The Goldilocks Scenario: The most optimistic scenario unfolds if the storm arrives with the desired mold. This "Goldilocks" scenario offers the perfect conditions for a lucrative outcome. The wholesale price for the wine, enriched by the mold, stands at $8.00 per bottle. However, this potential windfall comes with a caveat - a 30% reduction in production due to a decrease in overall grape juice.
Mr. Jaeger must carefully consider the trade-off between quality and quantity. While the profit margin is substantial, the reduced production volume could impact overall profitability. The delicate balance between quality and quantity becomes a key factor in determining the ultimate success of this scenario.
In conclusion, the decision-making process for William Jaeger revolves around a careful consideration of risks and rewards. While an immediate harvest presents a safe and predictable option, the potential for higher profits lies in the gamble of waiting for the storm and the elusive mold.
Considering the intricate dance of probability and the unforeseen consequences of nature, Mr. Jaeger's ultimate choice is not just about grapes and wine but a strategic navigation through uncertainties to achieve the optimal outcome for Freemark Abbey Winery.
The Harvest Dilemma: A Winemaker's Decision. (2016, Sep 02). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/freemark-abbey-winery-case-study-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
