Identification of Unknown Bacteria: Serratia Marcescens & Bacillus Cereus

Categories: Biology

Abstract

This study aimed to identify and differentiate two unknown organisms obtained from a nutrient broth. It was known that one of the organisms was gram-positive, and the other was gram-negative, both sourced from vomit. The identification process involved Gram staining, selective media, biochemical tests, and growth observations. The results revealed that the gram-negative organism is Serratia marcescens, while the gram-positive organism is Bacillus cereus. The epidemiological implications of these findings were discussed.

Introduction

The objective of this study was to distinguish and identify two unidentified organisms derived from a nutrient broth sample.

The only information available about these organisms was that one was gram-positive and the other was gram-negative, both originating from vomit. To achieve this differentiation, various microbiological techniques and tests were employed. The identification process began with Gram staining to categorize the bacteria as either gram-positive or gram-negative. Subsequent tests, including phenotypic and biochemical assays, were conducted to further characterize and differentiate these organisms.

Materials and Methods

Gram Stain

The Gram staining procedure was used to differentiate the organisms based on their cell wall structure.

Get quality help now
Marrie pro writer
Marrie pro writer
checked Verified writer

Proficient in: Biology

star star star star 5 (204)

“ She followed all my directions. It was really easy to contact her and respond very fast as well. ”

avatar avatar avatar
+84 relevant experts are online
Hire writer

Fresh pure cultures grown in nutrient broth were used for this test. A sample was placed on a slide, heat-fixed, and stained with Crystal Violet, Gram's Iodine, alcohol, and Safranin. The stained slide was then examined under a microscope, starting from the lowest magnification and progressing to oil immersion.

Phenylethyl Alcohol Agar (PEA)

PEA is a selective medium for identifying gram-positive bacteria. Both organisms were inoculated onto opposite sides of a PEA plate and incubated at 37°C for 18-24 hours.

Get to Know The Price Estimate For Your Paper
Topic
Number of pages
Email Invalid email

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

You won’t be charged yet!

The appearance of the medium after incubation was observed.

MacConkey Agar

MacConkey agar is both a selective and differential medium for identifying gram-negative bacteria and differentiating lactose-fermenting from non-lactose-fermenting bacteria. Only the gram-negative organism was inoculated onto this medium. After incubation at 37°C for 18-24 hours, the growth and appearance of the medium were examined.

Mannitol Salt Agar

Mannitol Salt Agar is used to identify organisms based on their ability to ferment mannitol and tolerate salt. Both organisms were inoculated onto this medium and incubated at 37°C for 18-24 hours. The growth and appearance of the medium were observed.

Methyl Red/Voges-Proskauer Tests

The Methyl Red and Voges-Proskauer tests were performed to assess glucose metabolism and end product formation by the organisms. The medium was inoculated with isolate #1 and incubated at 37°C for 48 hours. After incubation, the results for both tests were observed.

Triple Sugar-Iron (TSI) Agar Test

The TSI agar test was used to differentiate bacteria based on carbohydrate fermentation and hydrogen sulfide production. Both isolates, #1 and #2, were inoculated into TSI slants and incubated at 37°C for 18-24 hours. The appearance of the medium and gas production were noted.

Catalase Test

The catalase test was performed to determine if the organisms could produce catalase, which helps degrade hydrogen peroxide. A few drops of 3% hydrogen peroxide were added to smears of each isolate, and the presence or absence of bubbling was observed.

Oxidase Test

The oxidase test was conducted to determine if the organisms produce cytochrome oxidase. Colonies grown on a medium were tested using p-aminodi-methlyaniline oxalate, and the reaction was observed.

Chocolate Agar

Chocolate agar was used to cultivate colonies of isolate #2 for the oxidase test. After inoculation, the plate was incubated at 37°C for 18-24 hours.

Blood Agar

Blood agar was used to assess the hemolytic properties of isolate #2. After inoculation, the plate was incubated at 37°C for 24 hours, and the presence of hemolysis was observed.

Starch Hydrolysis Test

The starch hydrolysis test was performed to detect amylase production by the organisms. Starch agar plates were inoculated with isolates #1 and #2 and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. The plates were flooded with Gram's iodine, and the presence or absence of a blue-black halo around the colonies was observed.

Experimental Procedure

The experimental procedures were conducted as follows:

Gram Stain

Slides were prepared with fresh cultures, and the Gram staining process was carried out. The appearance of the stained organisms was observed under a microscope.

Selective Media

Both organisms were inoculated onto PEA plates and incubated. The plates were examined for growth and changes in medium appearance.

MacConkey Agar

Only the gram-negative organism was inoculated onto MacConkey agar plates and incubated. The plates were observed for growth and changes in medium appearance.

Mannitol Salt Agar

Both organisms were inoculated onto Mannitol Salt Agar plates and incubated. The plates were examined for growth and changes in medium appearance.

Methyl Red/Voges-Proskauer Tests

The methyl red and Voges-Proskauer tests were performed for isolate #1, and the results were observed.

Triple Sugar-Iron (TSI) Agar Test

The TSI agar test was conducted for both isolates, #1 and #2, and the results were observed.

Catalase Test

The catalase test was performed for both isolates, and the presence or absence of bubbling was noted.

Oxidase Test

The oxidase test was conducted for both isolates, and the reaction was observed.

Chocolate Agar

Isolate #2 was inoculated onto chocolate agar plates and incubated. The plates were examined for growth.

Blood Agar

Isolate #2 was inoculated onto blood agar plates and incubated. The plates were observed for growth and hemolysis.

Starch Hydrolysis Test

The starch hydrolysis test was performed for both isolates, and the presence or absence of a blue-black halo was observed.

Results

The results of the various physiological and biochemical tests are summarized in the following tables:

Table 1: Physiological & Biochemical Test Results - #1 (Serratia marcescens)

Test Reagent or Media Temperature Observations Results Interpretations
Gram Stain Crystal violet, iodine, alcohol, safranin 37°C Reddish-purple small rods Gram-negative Slightly inconclusive; appears as coccobacilli
PEA N/A 37°C No growth, no change in medium Gram-positive Indicative of gram-positivity
MacConkey Agar N/A 37°C Bright red growth, no change in medium Gram-negative No lactose fermentation; gram-negative
Mannitol Salt Agar N/A 37°C No growth, no change in medium Gram-negative No mannitol fermentation; salt-intolerant
Methyl Red Methyl red 37°C Yellow-orange color Negative Pyruvic acid metabolized to neutral end products
Voges-Proskauer Barritt’s reagent A and B 37°C No change in medium Negative Does not ferment glucose
TSI Agar N/A 37°C Red slant, yellow butt; slight motility Motile, ferments glucose with no gas
Catalase 3% hydrogen peroxide 37°C Bubbling Positive Facultative anaerobe
Oxidase p-aminodi-methlyaniline oxalate 37°C No reaction Negative Does not produce cytochrome oxidase

Table 2: Physiological & Biochemical Test Results - #2 (Bacillus cereus)

Test Reagent or Media Temperature Observations Results Interpretations
Gram Stain Crystal violet, iodine, alcohol, safranin 37°C Gram-positive rods Gram-positive Gram-positive rods
PEA N/A 37°C No growth, no change in medium Gram-positive Gram-positive
MacConkey Agar N/A 37°C N/A N/A Not tested
Mannitol Salt Agar N/A 37°C No growth, no change in medium Gram-positive No mannitol fermentation; salt-intolerant
Methyl Red Methyl red 37°C No change in medium Negative Does not ferment glucose
Voges-Proskauer Barritt’s reagent A and B 37°C No change in medium Negative Does not produce cytochrome oxidase
TSI Agar N/A 37°C Yellow slant, yellow butt; slight motility Lactose/sucrose/glucose fermenter, anaerobe, motile
Starch Hydrolysis Test N/A 37°C Growth with a clear ring around colonies Positive for starch hydrolysis and amylase production

Discussion

Identification of Bacteria #1 (Serratia marcescens)

The initial Gram staining of bacteria #1 showed a reddish-purple coloration, which appeared as small rods. Initially, this observation was suggestive of gram-positive diplococci, but further testing was required to confirm the identity.

Subsequent tests, including inoculation on PEA and MacConkey agar, provided additional information. PEA showed no growth and no change in medium appearance, indicating that the organism did not belong to the group of gram-positive bacteria that PEA selects for. MacConkey agar displayed bright red growth with no change in medium appearance, which suggested that the organism was gram-negative and did not ferment lactose.

The Methyl Red test results were negative, indicating that the organism did not ferment glucose to produce acidic end products. Additionally, the Voges-Proskauer test was also negative, indicating the absence of acetoin production. These results further supported the conclusion that bacteria #1 was not an enteric bacterium that ferments glucose.

The Triple Sugar-Iron (TSI) agar test revealed a red slant and yellow butt, along with slight motility. This indicated that the organism was motile, an anaerobe, and able to ferment glucose without gas production.

The catalase test showed a positive result, indicating the presence of catalase. This suggested that bacteria #1 was a facultative anaerobe, capable of degrading hydrogen peroxide.

The oxidase test yielded a negative result, indicating that the organism did not produce cytochrome oxidase.

Collectively, the test results led to the identification of bacteria #1 as Serratia marcescens, a gram-negative, facultative anaerobic bacterium that ferments glucose without gas production.

Identification of Bacteria #2 (Bacillus cereus)

Bacteria #2 was initially identified as gram-positive rods based on the Gram stain results. This observation was consistent with the typical morphology of Bacillus species, which are known to be gram-positive, aerobic, spore-forming rods.

The PEA test showed no growth and no change in medium appearance, indicative of gram-positivity. However, the MacConkey agar test was not performed for this organism.

The Mannitol Salt Agar test revealed no growth and no change in medium appearance, suggesting that the organism did not ferment mannitol and was salt-intolerant.

The Methyl Red test yielded no change in medium appearance, indicating that the organism did not ferment glucose to produce acidic end products. Similarly, the Voges-Proskauer test showed no change in medium, suggesting the absence of acetoin production.

In the TSI agar test, bacteria #2 exhibited a yellow slant and yellow butt, along with slight motility. This indicated that the organism was a lactose/sucrose/glucose fermenter, an anaerobe, and possessed motility.

The catalase test produced no bubbling, indicating the absence of catalase production. This implied that bacteria #2 was a strict anaerobe.

The oxidase test results were negative, indicating that the organism did not produce cytochrome oxidase.

Additionally, the starch hydrolysis test showed a clear ring around the colonies, indicating the presence of amylase and positive starch hydrolysis.

Based on the overall test results, bacteria #2 was identified as Bacillus cereus, a gram-positive, spore-forming bacterium capable of starch hydrolysis and lactose/sucrose/glucose fermentation.

Epidemiology

The epidemiological implications of identifying these bacteria are essential in understanding potential health risks associated with the organisms. In this context, the organisms were isolated from vomit, and it is crucial to consider their possible roles in foodborne illnesses.

Bacillus cereus, identified as bacteria #2, is known to cause food poisoning characterized by symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and headaches. This type of food poisoning typically occurs within ½ to 6 hours after consuming contaminated food, often dishes containing starches like pasta salad or rice. In the case of the identified patient with vomiting, it is likely that the ingestion of contaminated food led to Bacillus cereus food poisoning. It is important to note that this bacterium can survive cooking, so proper food handling and storage are crucial to prevent foodborne illness. Prevention measures include prompt refrigeration of rice products and maintaining good hygiene practices.

On the other hand, Serratia marcescens, identified as bacteria #1, might have been present in the vomit due to the same contaminated food source or could have been part of the patient's intestinal microbiota without causing illness. Serratia marcescens is generally considered an opportunistic pathogen and may cause infections in immunocompromised individuals. In this particular case, its presence in the vomit may not be directly linked to the observed symptoms of vomiting.

In conclusion, while Bacillus cereus was likely responsible for the vomiting episode, Serratia marcescens might have been present as a bystander or part of the normal gut flora. Proper food handling and hygiene practices are essential to prevent foodborne illnesses caused by organisms like Bacillus cereus.

Conclusion

This study successfully identified two unknown organisms obtained from a nutrient broth, which were derived from vomit. Bacteria #1 was identified as Serratia marcescens, a gram-negative, facultative anaerobic bacterium capable of fermenting glucose without gas production. Bacteria #2 was identified as Bacillus cereus, a gram-positive, spore-forming bacterium with the ability to hydrolyze starch and ferment lactose/sucrose/glucose.

Understanding the identities of these bacteria is crucial for epidemiological considerations, especially in cases of foodborne illnesses. Bacillus cereus, in particular, is associated with symptoms of food poisoning, emphasizing the importance of proper food handling and storage practices.

Bibliography

  • (n.d.). Retrieved May 10, 2009, from Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/ Alexander, S., & Strete, D. (2001).
  • Microbiology: A Photographic Atlas for the Laboratory. San Francisco, et al: Daryl Fox. Black, J., & Black, L. (2008).
  • Microbiology: Principles and Explorations (7th ed.). Jefferson City: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Breed, R. S. (1957).
  • Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology (Seventh ed.). Baltimore: The Williams & Wikins Company. Cappuccino, J. G., & Sherman, N. (2008).
  • Microbiology: A Laboratory Manual (Eighth ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pearson Benjamin Cummings. General Background. (2009).
  • (T. W. Firm, Producer) Retrieved May 10, 2009, from Serratia- Marcescens.org: http://www.serratia-marcescens.org/index.cfm Katelijne Dierick, e. a. (2005, Aug).
  • Journal of General Microbiology. Retrieved May 10, 2009, from Pub Med Central: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1233987 Nutrition, C. f. (2009, April 9).
  • Bad Bug Book: Foodborne Pathogenic Microorganisms. Retrieved May 10, 2009, from United States Food and Drug Administration: http://www.foodsafety.gov/~mow/chap12.html
Updated: Dec 29, 2023
Cite this page

Identification of Unknown Bacteria: Serratia Marcescens & Bacillus Cereus. (2016, Mar 05). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/document/serratia-marcescens-bacillus-cereus-report

Identification of Unknown Bacteria: Serratia Marcescens & Bacillus Cereus essay
Live chat  with support 24/7

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

get help with your assignment