Optimizing LDH Purification: Strategies for Enhanced Yield and Comprehensive Characterization

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) serves a pivotal role in anaerobic glycolysis, constituting a critical component in the normal functioning of the body. This study focused on the extraction and purification of LDH from chicken muscle tissue, employing a diverse range of techniques. To assess the presence and purity of LDH, analytical methods including activity and protein assays were systematically applied.

Initial steps involved the disruption of cells and solubilization of proteins. Subsequent purification of LDH was achieved by isolating it from the protein mixture precipitated with ammonium sulfate, utilizing affinity chromatography.

The activity of LDH was meticulously evaluated through spectrophotometric determination of NADH at 340 nm.

The Pierce BCA assay of the crude homogenate revealed an initial protein concentration of 100 mg/ml. Post-purification, the final protein concentration in the pooled affinity sample was established at 0.2 mg/ml. The total specific activity of LDH was quantified at 58.5 µmol/min/mg, yielding 0.6%. While the successful purification of LDH was achieved, potential avenues for further improvement in yield were identified.

Get quality help now

Bella Hamilton

Verified writer

Proficient in: Biology

5 (234)

“ Very organized ,I enjoyed and Loved every bit of our professional interaction ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

To enhance the depth of information, future perspectives, challenges encountered during the experiment, and potential refinements in methodology can be explored. Additionally, discussing the broader implications of the study or its relevance in the context of related research can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the findings.

Cell Disruption and LDH Extraction: Approximately 40 g of minced chicken breast meat (40.327 g) underwent homogenization with 75 ml of cold extraction buffer in four 30-second bursts. The extraction buffer composition included 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonylflouride (PMSF), and 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA).

The homogenization process occurred in a cold room to prevent protein denaturation. Following homogenization, the mixture underwent centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 20 minutes at 4°C. The resulting supernatant was filtered through two layers of cheesecloth to eliminate lipids, and the total volume was recorded. Three 0.5 ml aliquots (crude extract) were stored at -200°C.

Ammonium Sulfate Precipitation: Protein precipitation was achieved using a 60% ammonium sulfate concentration. Gradual addition of 0.39 g of ammonium sulfate per ml of supernatant occurred over 15-20 minutes with continuous gentle stirring at 4°C. The mixture underwent centrifugation for 20 minutes at 15,000 rpm at 4°C, and the supernatant was discarded. The resulting pellet was stored at -200°C.

Dialysis: Ammonium sulfate precipitation resulted in a high salt concentration in the protein mixture, posing potential interference in subsequent purification steps. To address this, dialysis was performed. The pellet was suspended in Tris-PMSF buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.6, 0.5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, and 1 mM EDTA) at 4°C until dissolved. Four milliliters of the protein mixture were added to the dialysis tubing and incubated twice overnight with two 1-liter buffer changes, utilizing the same extraction buffer as used in cell lysis. After two incubations, the protein mixture was gently resuspended, underwent centrifugation for 10 minutes at 15,000 rpm at 4°C, and the pellet was discarded. The total volume of the supernatant was recorded, and three 0.1 ml aliquots were collected.

To enhance the uniqueness of the information, additional details about the rationale behind each step, specific challenges encountered, or potential variations in methodology can be incorporated.

The utilization of a Cibacron Blue column facilitated the separation of LDH from other proteins. The column was meticulously prepared by initially rinsing it with Tris-PMSF buffer. Subsequently, the protein mixture was introduced into the column, and a stepwise process followed, including the addition of 10 ml of NAD Buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.6, 0.5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM lithium acetate, and 1 mM NAD+) and 10 ml of NADH (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.6, 1 mM NADH, and 0.5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol). Intervals between these steps involved thorough washing of the column with 10 ml of Tris-PMSF Buffer. Absorbance readings at 280 nm were recorded for each 5 ml fraction, and in cases where the absorbance exceeded 1.5 nm, 1:10 dilutions were implemented.

The LDH Enzyme assay, integral for quantifying LDH activity in the protein mixture, was executed across various stages, including the crude homogenate, desalted fraction, and six peak fractions obtained from the Cibacron Blue column. The assay involved the catalytic conversion of lactate to pyruvate and NAD+ to NADH, with spectrophotometric measurement at 340 nm. A meticulously prepared cocktail solution, comprising lactate stock solution (120 mM lithium lactate, 10 mM Tris-HCl; pH 8.6), NAD+ stock solution (12 mM NAD+, 10 mM Tris-HCl; pH 8.6), and bicarbonate stock solution (18 mM NaHCO3, 0.5 M NaCl) in a 6:4:2 ratio, was used in cuvettes. Subsequently, 10 microliters of the sample were added, and the assay absorption was measured at 340 nm. Samples with absorbance values exceeding 1.5 underwent dilution.

Employing the Thermo Scientific Pierce BCA Protein Assay, which is detergent-compatible and relies on bicinchoninic acid (BCA), total protein concentration was quantified. A series of standard solutions of Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) in concentrations ranging from 0 to 2000 µg/ml were prepared from a 2 mg/ml BSA stock solution. In a microplate, 25 µl of diluted crude (1:500, 1:250), desalted (1:100, 1:50), and six peak fractions from the Cibacron Blue column (1:10, 1:5) were loaded alongside 175 µl of BCA working reagent. Incubation for 30 minutes at 37°C ensued, followed by absorbance measurement at 562 nm.

To further enhance the understanding of the experimental process, insights into the considerations for choosing specific concentrations or ratios in the assay components, any troubleshooting during the assays, or potential implications of the results could be beneficial. Additionally, discussing the significance of the chosen methods and their relevance to the overall objectives of the study could provide a more comprehensive perspective.

The objective of this study was to extract and purify the LDH enzyme from chicken muscle tissue through a series of techniques, encompassing homogenization, ammonium sulfate precipitation, dialysis, and affinity chromatography. The assessment of LDH content in the samples was carried out using activity and protein assays.

Crude Extraction: The initial step involved homogenizing chicken muscle tissue in a blender with cold extraction buffer, aiming to lyse cells and release LDH into a slurry of tissue components. Subsequent centrifugation separated membranes, nuclei, and other large cellular components, forming a pellet and leaving a supernatant containing the crude product. Temperature control was crucial post-homogenization, considering that this step not only released proteins like LDH but also activated proteases that could potentially degrade LDH. To minimize protease activity, samples were kept on ice, the buffer was pre-cooled, and conservative blending techniques were employed to avoid excess kinetic energy. After filtration through cheesecloth, the final volume of the crude homogenate sample was unexpectedly higher at 74 ml. Potential reasons for this discrepancy could include the addition of more than 75 ml of buffer volume, leading to an increase in overall volume. Alternatively, the presence of more solid components, such as fats, might have necessitated longer centrifugation beyond the initially set 20 minutes.

In order to enhance the uniqueness of the discussion, additional information about the specific challenges faced during homogenization, potential variations in temperature control methods, or insights into the expected composition of the crude homogenate can be incorporated. Moreover, a discussion on the implications of the unexpected volume and its potential impact on downstream processes could contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the experimental outcomes.

Desalted Sample

To the crude extract, 60% ammonium sulfate was added, precipitating LDH proteins and forming a 40% pellet theoretically containing a significant portion of the original LDH. This pellet was then re-suspended in a minimal volume (4 ml), resulting in a more concentrated sample. However, this process introduced a high concentration of salts to the protein mixture, potentially interfering with subsequent purification steps. The 4 ml protein mixture underwent a dialysis procedure to eliminate excess salts, and the final volume after dialysis was noted as 6 ml. An unexpected increase in volume could be attributed to the potential mixing of the extraction buffer with the protein mixture, possibly due to tubing leakage or insufficiently tightened tubing clips.

Affinity Chromatography

Utilizing a Cibacron Blue column, an affinity column specific to dehydrogenase-type proteins, LDH proteins were selectively targeted due to a compound structurally similar to NADH covalently attached to the column. Thirteen fractions were collected, and absorbance at 280 nm was measured to assess the presence of LDH protein in each fraction. A 1:10 dilution was performed if the absorbance reading exceeded 1.5 nm, indicating potential saturation and less than 1% light reaching the detector.

During the addition of the protein mixture (fraction #4), a high absorbance reading of 10 nm was observed (Fig. 1). This could be attributed to the presence of numerous non-dehydrogenase-type proteins that were eluted first during the affinity chromatography process. A second peak was observed after the addition of NAD+, as it resulted in the removal of loosely bound proteins. A third peak emerged after adding NADH, releasing a maximum amount of LDH proteins (Fig. 1).

LDH activity was spectrophotometrically measured by assessing the absorbance of NADH at 340 nm. Three peak fractions were selected for this assay based on their absorbance values after adding NAD+ (fraction #6, 7, 8), and three others were chosen after adding NADH during the affinity chromatography step (fraction #10, 11, 12).

A substantial activity of 141 µmol/min/ml was observed at fraction #7 (PF1), suggesting a significant presence of proteins in the sample. The second peak activity was noted at fraction #10, indicating a higher LDH protein content compared to fraction #11 (PF2) (Fig. 1). Based on this information, fraction #10 was chosen for the protein assay. The desalted sample exhibited the highest activity among all the samples (Table 1), potentially attributed to errors during dialysis, as previously explained.

To enhance the uniqueness of the discussion, additional details on the potential impact of non-dehydrogenase-type proteins on the purification process, insights into the dynamics of NAD+ and NADH additions, and considerations for selecting specific fractions for enzyme activity assays can be included. Furthermore, a brief discussion on the implications of unexpected results and potential sources of errors could contribute to a more comprehensive understanding.

Increase in fold purification indicates the successful purification of LDH at each step, as depicted in Table 1. Nevertheless, to enhance the yield, alternative strategies can be explored. Adopting a different cell lysis method, such as sonication, may be advantageous in mitigating surface denaturation of LDH proteins. Additionally, substituting dialysis with a desalting column can be considered to minimize the risk of leakage. Exploring different affinity columns tailored to better separate LDH from other proteins could further optimize the purification process.

To comprehensively characterize LDH for purity and physical properties, additional experiments such as SDS-PAGE analysis and Western blotting are recommended. These techniques provide valuable insights into the molecular weight and potential contaminants, contributing to a more thorough assessment of LDH purity. Furthermore, conducting enzyme kinetic studies can shed light on the functional activity of LDH, offering a deeper understanding of its catalytic properties.

Considering these potential modifications and additional experiments will not only contribute to refining the purification protocol but also provide a more in-depth characterization of the purified LDH. This multifaceted approach ensures a comprehensive evaluation of both the structural and functional aspects of the enzyme, ultimately advancing the understanding of LDH in the context of this study.