To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
This lab report explores cost calculation methods, specifically traditional plantwide manufacturing overhead rate and activity-based costing, using Job 351 as an example. It discusses the application of these methods to calculate the cost of Job 351, providing a detailed breakdown and comparison of results. The report also analyzes the usefulness of cost estimates for managerial decision-making.
Job costing is a crucial accounting method used to track the costs associated with different projects or activities. It entails categorizing expenses into labor, materials, and overhead, enabling companies to manage projects efficiently and stay within budget.
Accurate cost calculation is essential for pricing decisions, budgeting, and assessing the profitability of individual jobs or projects.
Under the traditional costing approach, a single overhead rate is used to allocate overhead costs across all products based on a common allocation base. In this case, the allocation base is machine hours. The formula for calculating the plantwide overhead rate is as follows:
Plantwide Overhead Rate = Estimated Overhead Cost / Estimated Allocation Base
Using the provided data:
Estimated Overhead Cost | Estimated Allocation Base | Plantwide Overhead Rate |
---|---|---|
$570,000 | 15,000 machine hours | $38 per machine hour |
Now, let's calculate the applied overhead cost for Job 351:
Applied Overhead Cost = Plantwide Overhead Rate × Actual Machine Hours
Given that the actual machine hours for Job 351 are 130:
Plantwide Overhead Rate | Actual Machine Hours | Applied Overhead Cost |
---|---|---|
$38 per machine hour | 130 machine hours | $4,940 |
Now, let's calculate the total cost of Job 351:
Total Cost = Direct Materials + Direct Labor + Applied Overhead
Direct Materials | Direct Labor | Applied Overhead | Total Cost |
---|---|---|---|
$17,550 | $2,000 | $4,940 | $24,490 |
Activity-Based Costing (ABC) is a more refined costing method that assigns overhead costs to specific activities and then allocates those costs to products based on their consumption of these activities.
The process involves several steps:
For Job 351, we have identified three cost pools and calculated their allocation rates:
Activity | Total Estimated Cost | Cost Driver | Allocation Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Machine Maintenance | $150,000 | Machine Hours (MH) | $10 per MH |
Engineering Change Orders | $160,000 | Number of Change Orders | $40 per order |
Waste Disposal | $260,000 | Pounds of Hazardous Materials Generated | $260 per pound |
Now, let's calculate the overhead costs for each activity based on the actual consumption for Job 351:
Activity | Actual Consumption | Allocated Overhead Cost |
---|---|---|
Machine Maintenance | 130 MH | $1,300 |
Engineering Change Orders | 9 orders | $360 |
Waste Disposal | 40 pounds | $10,400 |
Now, let's calculate the total cost of Job 351 using ABC:
Direct Materials | Direct Labor | Allocated Overhead | Total Cost |
---|---|---|---|
$17,550 | $2,000 | $12,060 | $31,610 |
Comparing the two cost estimates:
Under traditional costing, the cost of Job 351 is $24,490, while under ABC, it is $31,610. The ABC method provides a more accurate cost estimate because it considers specific resources used by each product. This information is valuable for managerial decision-making.
Traditional costing relies on a single overhead rate for the entire production process, which can result in distortions when products have different resource consumption patterns. In contrast, ABC identifies the activities that drive costs and allocates them accordingly, providing a more granular and accurate view of costs.
In conclusion, the cost estimate based on Activity-Based Costing (ABC) rates provides more useful information for managerial decision-making. It offers a more accurate reflection of the actual costs incurred by Job 351, taking into account the specific activities and resources involved. Managers can use this information to make informed pricing decisions, improve cost control, and identify areas for cost reduction.
Given the benefits of ABC in providing precise cost allocation, it is recommended that the company consider implementing an ABC system for more accurate cost tracking and decision-making. This can help the company gain a competitive edge by pricing its products more competitively and efficiently managing resources.
It is essential to acknowledge that implementing ABC can be resource-intensive and may require a significant initial investment in terms of time and software. However, the long-term benefits in terms of cost control and improved decision-making can outweigh the initial challenges.
Lab Report: Cost Calculation and Analysis. (2024, Jan 09). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/document/lab-report-cost-calculation-and-analysis
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment