To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
How does changing the concentration of hydrogen peroxide affect the time taken for the iodine clock reaction to occur?
A chemical reaction involves the conversion of reactants into products through the rearrangement of atoms (Treichel, 2019). The rate of a chemical reaction depends on the frequency and energy of particle collisions (Holewa, 2019).
The collision theory explains why reactions occur at different rates and emphasizes the need for effective collisions, which involve proper orientation and sufficient energy (Lawson, 2019). Activation energy is the minimum energy required for a reaction to occur (Gregersen, 2018).
Factors like temperature, pressure, reactant concentration, and the presence of catalysts can influence reaction rates.
Temperature increases kinetic energy and collision frequency (Clark, 2002), while catalysts lower activation energy (Holewa, 2019). Additionally, increasing the surface area of reactants increases collision opportunities.
In this experiment, we investigate how changing the concentration of hydrogen peroxide affects the iodine clock reaction.
The Iodine Clock Reaction
Materials
The Iodine Clock Reaction
Experiment | Time (minutes) |
---|---|
A | 19.05 |
B | 7.48 |
C | 3.06 |
D | 1.30 |
E | 0.51 |
F | 0.47 |
G | 0.43 |
Experiment | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 4 | Trial 5 | Trial 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B/5 | 4.31 | 6.03 | 4.01 | 5.59 | 7.08 | 10.41 |
C/5 | 3.23 | 2.40 | 3.32 | 2.24 | 2.10 | 3.30 |
D/5 | 1.10 | 1.29 | 1.39 | 2.21 | 2.21 | 1.44 |
E/5 | 1.19 | 1.23 | 1.17 | 1.14 | 1.04 | 1.07 |
Experiment | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 4 | Trial 5 | Trial 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B/10 | 4.13 | 3.58 | 2.57 | 4.45 | 4.29 | 3.55 |
C/10 | 1.19 | 2.08 | 2.13 | 1.54 | 2.11 | 2.01 |
D/10 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 1.16 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 1.26 |
E/10 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 0.44 |
Experiment | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 4 | Trial 5 | Trial 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B/15 | 4.25 | 3.48 | 4.37 | 3.56 | 11.28 | 5.01 |
C/15 | 1.38 | 1.39 | 1.48 | 2.43 | 6.37 | 2.45 |
D/15 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 1.23 | 3.52 | 1.43 |
E/15 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 1.11 | 3.27 | 0.59 |
Calculations used:
Standard Deviation:
SD = √[Σ(xi - x̄)² / (N - 1)]
Standard Error:
SE = SD / √N
95% Confidence Intervals:
95% CI = x̄ ± (1.96 * SE)
Experiment | Mean | Standard Deviation | Standard Error | 95% Confidence Intervals |
---|---|---|---|---|
B/5 | 6.238333 | 2.334904 | 1.167452 | 6.238333333 ± 1.87 |
C/5 | 2.765 | 0.576463 | 0.23534 | 2.765 ± 0.461 |
D/5 | 1.606667 | 0.481608 | 0.196616 | 1.606666667 ± 0.385 |
E/5 | 1.14 | 0.072664 | 0.029665 | 1.14 ± 0.0581 |
Experiment | Mean | Standard Deviation | Standard Error | 95% Confidence Intervals |
---|---|---|---|---|
B/10 | 3.761667 | 0.690867 | 0.282045 | 3.761666667 ± 0.553 |
C/10 | 1.843333 | 0.388827 | 0.158738 | 1.843333333 ± 0.311 |
D/10 | 0.781667 | 0.333731 | 0.136245 | 0.781666667 ± 0.267 |
E/10 | 0.413333 | 0.083106 | 0.033928 | 0.413333333 ± 0.0665 |
Experiment | Mean | Standard Deviation | Standard Error | 95% Confidence Intervals |
---|---|---|---|---|
B/15 | 5.325 | 2.971469 | 1.213097 | 5.325 ± 2.38 |
C/15 | 2.583333 | 1.921954 | 0.784634 | 2.583333333 ± 1.54 |
D/15 | 1.316667 | 1.143113 | 0.466674 | 1.316666667 ± 0.915 |
E/15 | 0.993333 | 1.155832 | 0.471866 | 0.993333333 ± 0.925 |
Although precautions were taken, potential sources of error exist:
Using a pipette introduced uncertainties due to a +/- 0.10mL tolerance.
Temperature fluctuations also impacted accuracy. The table below illustrates temperature variations:
Day | Temperature | Difference from 100% accuracy |
---|---|---|
Wed 12th June | 21.5°C | 1.5°C |
Fri 14th June | 22°C | 2°C |
Tues 18th June | 21°C | 1°C |
Thurs 20th June | 22.5°C | 2.5°C |
Fri 21st June | 23°C | 3°C |
This data indicates that the pipette measurements were not 100% accurate on any day.
Possible improvements include:
This experiment was valid, reliable, and controlled by maintaining constant conditions except for hydrogen peroxide concentration. The dependent variable was the time for the iodine clock reaction, while the independent variable was hydrogen peroxide concentration. The results showed that higher hydrogen peroxide concentration led to faster reactions, consistent with collision theory.
Increasing hydrogen peroxide concentration resulted in faster iodine clock reactions, supporting the hypothesis that concentration affects reaction rates. This aligns with collision theory, as higher concentrations increase collision frequency, leading to shorter reaction times.
Hydrogen Peroxide Concentration and Iodine Clock Reaction. (2024, Jan 02). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/document/hydrogen-peroxide-concentration-and-iodine-clock-reaction
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment