To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
This experiment aimed to investigate the conservation of energy principles by analyzing the interplay between kinetic energy (KE) and gravitational potential energy (PE) in a dynamic cart system. The fundamental equations for KE and PE were utilized to understand the energy changes as the dynamic cart moved along a track. The experimental results showed that while energy was not lost within the system, it was not conserved due to factors like friction and experimental uncertainties.
Kinetic energy (KE) represents the energy of an object in motion and is defined by the equation:
KE = 1/2 * m * v^2 (equation 1)
Where m is the mass of the moving object, and v is its velocity.
Potential energy (PE) is associated with the position of an object and, in this lab, specifically refers to gravitational potential energy.
Gravitational potential energy is defined by the equation:
PE_grav = m * g * y (equation 2)
Where m is the mass of the object, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and y is the height of the object above a reference point.
The total energy of the system is the sum of its kinetic energy and potential energy at any given moment:
Total energy = Kinetic energy + Potential energy = Constant
According to the law of conservation of energy, the total energy in a closed system remains constant; it is neither increased nor decreased in any process.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Physics
4.9 (247)
“ Rhizman is absolutely amazing at what he does . I highly recommend him if you need an assignment done ”
Energy can be converted from one form to another or transferred from one object to another, but the total amount remains unchanged and is conserved.
The experimental setup involved a dynamic cart moving along a track towards a motion sensor.
The following steps outline the procedure:
Analysis of the data revealed that energy was not lost within the system. However, the key observation was that energy was not conserved. The theoretical law of conservation assumes an idealized scenario without friction, where energy is conserved. In our experiment, we observed the presence of friction between the wheels of the cart and the track, as well as between the wheels of the coaster and the track. This friction accounted for the deviation from energy conservation.
The impact of friction can be seen in the energy versus time graphs. In an ideal scenario, where energy is conserved, the energy graph would display a horizontal line, indicating no change in energy over time. However, our graphs showed fluctuations and deviations from horizontal lines, which can be attributed to friction.
Additionally, a small fraction of systematic error occurred during the experiment, which contributed to the deviation from energy conservation. This error was associated with uncertainties in measuring the angle of the track and the position of the cart as detected by the motion sensor. These uncertainties introduced variability into the data, which further explained the non-conservation of energy.
The discrepancy between the theoretical expectation of energy conservation and the observed non-conservation in our experiment can be primarily attributed to friction. Friction is a dissipative force that opposes the motion of objects in contact, converting kinetic energy into other forms of energy, such as thermal energy. As the dynamic cart moved along the track, frictional forces between the cart's wheels and the track's surface led to energy losses, preventing the system from conserving energy as predicted by theory.
Furthermore, the systematic error in our measurements contributed to the non-conservation of energy. Uncertainties in the angle of the track and the position of the cart introduced variations in the data, which were reflected in the energy graphs. These uncertainties amplified the effect of friction, causing the energy to fluctuate over time.
Despite the non-conservation of energy, it is important to note that no energy was lost within the system. Energy was transferred between kinetic and potential forms as the cart moved up and down the track, adhering to the fundamental principles of energy conversion. The non-conservation observed in this experiment serves as a practical example of how real-world factors, such as friction and measurement uncertainties, can affect the idealized concept of energy conservation.
In conclusion, this experiment demonstrated that while energy was not lost within the system, it was not conserved due to the presence of friction and systematic errors in measurements. The non-conservation of energy was evident in the energy versus time graphs, which displayed fluctuations instead of a horizontal line as expected in an idealized scenario without friction. This experiment underscores the importance of considering real-world factors when applying the concept of energy conservation.
Future experiments could explore methods to minimize the impact of friction, such as using lubricants or smoother surfaces for the cart and track. Additionally, improving the accuracy of angle measurements and position detection could help reduce systematic errors and provide more consistent results. Further investigations into energy conservation in various physical systems, considering different sources of energy dissipation, would contribute to a deeper understanding of this fundamental principle.
Experiment Report: Conservation of Energy. (2016, Mar 16). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/document/conservation-of-mechanical-energy
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
