Now Accepting Apple Pay

Apple Pay is the easiest and most secure way to pay on StudyMoose in Safari.

I would like to begin by stating that, I really delighted in enjoying the film CRASH, a few of the things displayed in the movie are extremely sensible and much of it can’t even be taken into words. Two of the habits that I saw most, are bias and stereotyping. It was the reason for where all the occasions eliminated from. These habits are considered as thoughts and feelings that nearly everybody has felt more than when. This film shows us the different point of view of people in our society; it gives us an insight of the stereotypes that have actually developed within our society and within the world.

It invites us to see and understand how such a small stereotype and negative attitude can go a long method and impact individuals differently. In the film Crash it appears that feelings run high with racial and ethnic inequality such as disappointment, aggression, and reliable personalities. According to Diana Kendall in Social Issues In a Diverse Society, the frustration-aggression hypothesis is “People who are irritated in their efforts to accomplish an extremely wanted objective tend to develop a pattern of aggressiveness toward others (51 ).

Get quality help now
Sweet V
Verified writer

Proficient in: Aggression

4.9 (984)

“ Ok, let me say I’m extremely satisfy with the result while it was a last minute thing. I really enjoy the effort put in. ”

+84 relevant experts are online
Hire writer

” To put it simply, when individuals feel as though they are being prevented from attaining a goal, their frustration will typically turn into aggressiveness. In the motion picture Crash, Farhad, the Iranian/Persian storeowner attempted to live his best to pursue the American dream by running his own store. He hired a Latino locksmith professional named Daniel to have the lock at his shop changed but conflict emerged between the Sas 2 two and in the end, Daniel didn’t change the lock.

Get to Know The Price Estimate For Your Paper
Number of pages
Email Invalid email

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Check writers' offers

You won’t be charged yet!

Later, the shop gets robbed and trashed.

Farhad was currently an annoyed middle aged male who struggled to make ends meet, and now having his shop robbed has him act out strongly without anybody to blame. So, he decides to snap his anger towards Daniel, hoping it would assist him feel much better. Expectations of Arabs to be violent terrorists, Farhad is not even Arab. Technically, he is Persian, but what the store owner anticipates from him, he ultimately gets when Farhad “shoots” the little Hispanic lady. Farhad believes the Hispanic male is ripping him off so when his shop is looted, the Hispanic man is blamed although he had nothing to do with the damage.

Crash is full of many other sociological concepts, examining issues of race, social class, and gender, as well as many others. In this movie, we can see the theories of Durkheim and Marx for sure as well as many other concepts. Crash is one of those movies that make us rethink even what we think we know about the world we live in. Another sociological concept that Crash demonstrates is the Thomas Theorem. Basically, this theorem tells us that if we believe situations to be real, they become real to us. Our own subjective reality becomes our objective reality.

It follows then that if we believe certain things about an individual, he/she begins acting in exactly that way. It also follows that certain crimes or problems do not have an objective realities. Using drugs would be one example of that sort of victimless crime. The best example of this in the movie might be when Jean Cabot grips her purse when passing by Anthony (Luda cris) and Peter on the street. She believes black people to be a threat. Her subjective reality becomes real in the next minute when the two young Sas 3 black men carjack them. What the characters believe about others has become real in these instances.

Another sociological term demonstrated in Crash is the theory of micro-aggression. Microaggressions would be defined as “Microaggressions are subtle insults (verbal, nonverbal, and/or visual) directed toward people of color, often automatically or unconsciously. ” While the individual effects of these particular instances may be small, the cumulative effects can be devastating. In Crash, I believe the character that most exemplifies this is the film director. Examples of these subtle insults would be things such as people telling him that he just isn’t really black to them or the comments about language on the set of the movie.

He advises him to tell the black character to make his language “more black. ” These are subtle but insults nonetheless. These kinds of comments, combined with the powerlessness he feels when his wife is sexually assaulted lead to the blow-up where he almost gets himself killed. He has endured these subtle forms of racism his whole life, and he reaches a breaking point where he just isn’t going to take it The last concept that is displayed in Crash is the sociological concept of ethnocentrism. This means that we judge other cultures by the standards of our own.

Not only that, but we also believe that our own culture is superior to everyone else’s. Graham and his Latina girlfriend fight and he pokes fun at her culture by calling her Mexican even though she isn’t. Asian Americans speech patterns are made fun of, like the term “blaking” for braking. These characters don’t celebrate or even accept the characteristics of other cultures. They only mock them, assuming the superiority of their own culture. They fail to try to understand one another through Sas 4 ethnocentrism. Officer Ryan makes fun of the name Shaniqua, a more common name of African American culture.

All in all, Crash is a movie full of sociological concepts. Many more could be analyzed in cry, sometimes at almost the same time. When we laugh, however, we must question the underlying sociological assumptions or concepts that make us laugh. Are we laughing at some of the racist jokes because of our own ethnocentrism. Are we failing to see the microaggressions directed at members of minority groups all the time. Are we as guilty as Jean Cabot at making our own realities our truths? Do we have beliefs about certain groups of people and essentially make them come true for ourselves? Crash asks us to question all of these things.

Cite this page

Reality and Crash. (2016, Nov 30). Retrieved from

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

get help with your assignment