24/7 writing help on your phone
Save to my list
Remove from my list
This project focuses on a single house complex comprising 96 houses, predominantly used as summer residences. However, with an increasing trend of families deciding to stay all year round, an analysis of the power consumption throughout the year was necessitated.
In this project, a single house complex which contains 96 houses has selected. Most of the owners use their house in this complex as a summer house but every year 2 or 3 family decide to stay in the complex for 12 months.
Due to this event, calculations were made through the power analysis of a house which has the family stays there for 12 months.
Table 1. Monthly energy usage of a house in kWh
Month | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Maximum |
---|---|---|---|---|
January | 168 | 165 | 128 | 168 |
February | 110 | 131 | 116 | 131 |
March | 76 | 143 | 118 | 143 |
April | 139 | 108 | 159 | 159 |
May | 114 | 115 | 130 | 130 |
June | 148 | 178 | 130 | 178 |
July | 129 | 124 | 137 | 137 |
August | 142 | 143 | 142 | 143 |
September | 118 | 123 | 158 | 158 |
October | 133 | 121 | 97 | 133 |
November | 125 | 111 | 109 | 125 |
December | 100 | 126 | 119 | 126 |
As we can see in the table above, these are the energy usages of a house by months. The maximum energy usage of this complex calculated by months:
E_complex= E_house x 96
E_complex : Monthly energy usage of complex (only house based)
E_house : Monthly energy usage of a house
Table 2. Monthly maximum energy usage of single house complex in kWh
Month | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Maximum | total_max |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
January | 168 | 165 | 128 | 168 | 16128 |
February | 110 | 131 | 116 | 131 | 12576 |
March | 76 | 143 | 118 | 143 | 13728 |
April | 139 | 108 | 159 | 159 | 15264 |
May | 114 | 115 | 130 | 130 | 12480 |
June | 148 | 178 | 130 | 178 | 17088 |
July | 129 | 124 | 137 | 137 | 13152 |
August | 142 | 143 | 142 | 143 | 13728 |
September | 118 | 123 | 158 | 158 | 15168 |
October | 133 | 121 | 97 | 133 | 12768 |
November | 125 | 111 | 109 | 125 | 12000 |
December | 100 | 126 | 119 | 126 | 12096 |
The daily average energy usage of the complex calculated as:
E_((daily)_complex ) =E_complex/30
E_((daily)_complex ) : Daily energy usage of the complex (only house based)
E_complex : Monthly energy usage of complex (only house based)
Month 2015 2016 2017 Maximum total_max daily_tot_max
Table 3. Daily maximum energy usage of single house complex in kWh
Month | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Maximum | total_max | daily_tot_max |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
January | 168 | 165 | 128 | 168 | 16128 | 537.6 |
February | 110 | 131 | 116 | 131 | 12576 | 419.2 |
March | 76 | 143 | 118 | 143 | 13728 | 457.6 |
April | 139 | 108 | 159 | 159 | 15264 | 508.8 |
May | 114 | 115 | 130 | 130 | 12480 | 416 |
June | 148 | 178 | 130 | 178 | 17088 | 569.6 |
July | 129 | 124 | 137 | 137 | 13152 | 438.4 |
August | 142 | 143 | 142 | 143 | 13728 | 457.6 |
September | 118 | 123 | 158 | 158 | 15168 | 505.6 |
October | 133 | 121 | 97 | 133 | 12768 | 425.6 |
November | 125 | 111 | 109 | 125 | 12000 | 400 |
December | 100 | 126 | 119 | 126 | 12096 | 403.2 |
These values show the daily maximum energy usage of the complex only for the houses. But there are some other elements in the complex use energy aswell. For example; there are a small waste water treatment system, an irrigation motor, a pool and street lights. These are cathegorized with “other”.
Table 4. Daily energy usage of other elements by months in kWh
Month | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
---|---|---|---|
January | 159.0488 | 175.8065 | 79.37788 |
February | 32.21043 | 129.7619 | 81.8555 |
March | 92.06782 | 126.0292 | 65.22504 |
April | 98.04274 | 89.6381 | 59.25317 |
May | 75.38462 | 99.91551 | 41.48233 |
June | 123.0171 | 34.48889 | 37.88889 |
July | 222.0347 | 210.1075 | 205.53 |
August | 261.0008 | 165.384 | 374.8464 |
September | 204.34188 | 142.06349 | 114.14286 |
October | 179.4872 | 121.3441 | 163.3871 |
November | 166.39316 | 56.230159 | 95.468254 |
December | 137.6923 | 114.9155 | 127.4424 |
The energy usage of other elements in the system by months shown in the table above. As we can see it in the table above; the peak of the power is mostly seen in the summer times because of the irrigation motor and pool. Motor for irrigation is used from second half of may to end of the first half of the september. Pool is open from start of june to second half of september.
Table 5. Daily maximum energy usage of other elements by months in kWh
Month | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Max |
---|---|---|---|---|
January | 159.0488 | 175.8065 | 79.37788 | 175.8065 |
February | 32.21043 | 129.7619 | 81.8555 | 129.7619 |
March | 92.06782 | 126.0292 | 65.22504 | 126.0292 |
April | 98.04274 | 89.6381 | 59.25317 | 98.04274 |
May | 75.38462 | 99.91551 | 41.48233 | 99.91551 |
June | 123.0171 | 34.48889 | 37.88889 | 123.0171 |
July | 222.0347 | 210.1075 | 205.53 | 222.0347 |
August | 261.0008 | 165.384 | 374.8464 | 374.8464 |
September | 204.34188 | 142.06349 | 114.14286 | 204.34188 |
October | 179.4872 | 121.3441 | 163.3871 | 179.4872 |
November | 166.39316 | 56.230159 | 95.468254 | 166.39316 |
December | 137.6923 | 114.9155 | 127.4424 | 137.6923 |
The rest of the calculations are made with highest values from the table. Daily total energy usage of the complex is calculated by ;
E_((complex)_total )= E_(((daily〗_total)_max )+ E_((other)_daily )
E_((complex)_total ) : Total energy usage of single house complex
E_(((daily)_total)_max ) : Daily total maximum energy usage of complex (only house based)
E_((other)_monthly ) : Daily energy usage of other elements of complex
Table 6. Daily energy usage of single house complex by months in kWh
Month | Others | Houses | Total |
---|---|---|---|
January | 175.8065 | 537.6 | 713.4065 |
February | 129.7619 | 419.2 | 548.9619 |
March | 126.0292 | 457.6 | 583.6292 |
April | 98.04274 | 508.8 | 606.8427 |
May | 99.91551 | 416 | 515.9155 |
June | 123.0171 | 569.6 | 692.6171 |
July | 222.0347 | 438.4 | 660.4347 |
August | 374.8464 | 457.6 | 832.4464 |
September | 204.3419 | 505.6 | 709.9419 |
October | 179.4872 | 425.6 | 605.0872 |
November | 166.3932 | 400 | 566.3932 |
December | 137.6923 | 403.2 | 540.8923 |
These values shows the daily total energy usage of the complex by months.
Photovoltaic panel size can be calculated with these values:
C_pv= E_consumed/(t_solar x P_pv )
C_pv : Size of photovoltaic panels
E_consumed : Consumed energy of the system
t_solar : Sunshine duration
P_pv : Maximum power output of photovoltaic panel
But this formula can be calculated if the efficiency of the panel is 100%. In reality, photovoltaic panels affected by soiling of panels, wiring losses, shading, etc. to indicate to what photovoltaic panel may be stressed/ used in such conditions, a factor, known as derating factor, is specified. Derating factor is between 95% - 80% for photovoltaic panels. In this project, derating factor of photovoltaic panel selected as 85%.
Table 7. Daily required energy from PV panels by months in kWh
Month | E_total | E_pv |
---|---|---|
January | 713.4065 | 839.3018 |
February | 548.9619 | 645.8375 |
March | 583.6292 | 686.6226 |
April | 606.8427 | 713.9326 |
May | 515.9155 | 606.9594 |
June | 692.6171 | 814.8436 |
July | 660.4347 | 776.982 |
August | 832.4464 | 979.3487 |
September | 709.9419 | 835.2258 |
October | 605.0872 | 711.8673 |
November | 566.3932 | 666.3449 |
December | 540.8923 | 636.3439 |
Formula for calculating the size of photovoltaic panel is:
C_pv= E_required/(t_solar x P_pv x derating factor)
C_pv= E_required/(t_solar x P_pv x 0,85)
PLM-250M-60 photovoltaic panel from Perlight Company has been chosen in this project. It is a monocrystaline photovoltaic panel and maximum power of the photovoltaic panel is 250 watts.
Table 8. Technical specifications for PerlghtPLM-250M-60 PV Panel
Technical Specification | Value |
---|---|
Model | PLM-250M-60 |
P_max (Maximum Power) | 250 W |
V_mp (Voltage at Maximum Power) | 30.5 V |
I_mp (Current at Maximum Power) | 8.2 A |
V_oc (Open Circuit Voltage) | 38 V |
I_sc (Short Circuit Current) | 8.78 A |
Maximum System Voltage | 1000 V dc |
NOTC (Nominal Operating Cell Temperature) | 45℃ ± 2℃ |
Temperature coefficient of I_sc | 0.06 %/℃ |
Temperature coefficient of V_oc | -0.34 %/℃ |
Temperature coefficient of P_max | -0.45 %/℃ |
Power tolerance | 0 / +3% |
Working temperature | -40 ℃ to 85℃ |
This project is planned to be photovoltaic heavy hybrid system. Thus; most of the power will be generated by photovoltaic panels and the rest of the power will be generated by bio generator.
Calculation results by months are below:
Table 9. Size of PV Panels by months
Month | Size of PV Panels |
---|---|
January | 668 |
February | 428 |
March | 388 |
April | 351 |
May | 244 |
June | 398 |
July | 293 |
August | 382 |
September | 344 |
October | 367 |
November | 434 |
December | 530 |
The photovoltaic panel size has been chosen 350. In table 9 in may, it can be seen only 244 panel should be enough for whole complex. The datas from last 3 years show, energy usage of complex had the lowest value in may every year. According to the old head of that community, in may, electricity provider company making some maintenance on the transmission lines. Because of that, they cut off the electricity. Sometimes this complex didn’t get electricity for 48 hours in this process.
Two renewable energy resources selected in hybrid energy system part of this project. Photovoltaic system and small biogas power plant.
Biogas produced from biological waste in the digester.Biological process named anaerobic digestion heppens in the digestor then produced gas send it to the Desulphurization unit. Desulphurizedbiogas send to the gas engine to create electricity.The rest of the waste left in the digester contains rich elements such as potassium, nitrogen, iron, phosphorous, etc. Because of this, treated waste send to transition pond to create fertilizer.
Table 10. Biogas kits and their costs in Clever-Ferm-Kit
Kit | Power (kW) | Diameter of digester (m) | Volume of Digester (m3) | Total Cost (Euro) |
---|---|---|---|---|
BO K30 | 30 | 9.45 | 320 | 230,000 |
BO K50 | 50 | 12.89 | 600 | 305,000 |
BO K75 | 75 | 12.89 | 800 | 350,000 |
BO K100 | 100 | 16.33 | 1000 | 380,000 |
Output of the photovoltaic system can be different time to time because it depends on weather conditions. Therefore maximum power point tracker must be used if maximum power is required from the system. MPPT charger is a must for this kind of systems. For battery charger unit; the maximum power point tracker charger unit and string calculator tool from Morningstar Company used in this project. First of all; manufacturer and model of photovoltaic panel has been selected in the PV Module. Then the mppt charger of morningstar selected. After that; the rest of the information of system entered in the required areas.
For this system; deep-cycle batteries recommended because deep-cycle batteries are specifically designed for to be discharged to low energy level and rapid recharged or cycle charged/discharged day after day. The battery should be large enough to store sufficient energy to operate the appliences at night and cloudy days.
The battery size of the system depends on ;
Battery system capacity (Ah)= (daily energy usage x days of autonomy)/(battery loss x depth of discharge x nominal battery voltage)
Depth of discharge is defined as capacity in ampere hours that is discharged from a fully charged battery, divided by battery nominal capacity. Depth of discharge is a method to indicate battery’s state of charge. In this method; %100 means empty and %0 means full. There is a correlation between depth of discharge and cycle life of battery in some battery technologies such as lead acid type of batteries. The recommended depth of charge is 70%.
Days of autonomy is chosen 1 day because of the maintenance or other problems in system.
Nominal battery voltage is 12 voltage.
Battery loss depends on many factors related to battery. It is between 80% - 90% for lead acid type of batteries. In this system it is chosen 85%.
Three different capacity of batteries (100 Ah, 150 Ah and 200 Ah) compared for economical analysis by months.
Table 11. Size of battery system for 100 Ah, 150 Ah and 200 Ah
Month | 100 Ah | 150 Ah | 200 Ah |
---|---|---|---|
January | 799,335 | 532,89 | 399,675 |
February | 615,0814 | 410,0556 | 307,5417 |
March | 653,9263 | 435,9508 | 326,9631 |
April | 679,93584 | 453,29056 | 339,96792 |
May | 578,0566 | 385,3711 | 289,0283 |
June | 776,04156 | 517,36104 | 388,02078 |
July | 739,9829 | 493,3219 | 369,9915 |
August | 932,713 | 621,8087 | 466,3565 |
September | 795,45309 | 530,30206 | 397,72654 |
October | 677,9688 | 451,9792 | 338,9844 |
November | 634,6142 | 423,0761 | 317,3071 |
December | 606,0418 | 404,02787 | 303,0209 |
8 batteries from 4 different producers in Turkey has been compared.
Table 12. Batteries and their costs
Producer | Capacity (Ah) | Price (Euro) |
---|---|---|
YIGITAKU | 100 | 274,7663551 |
ORBUS | 150 | 208,5669782 |
SOYTURK | 150 | 225,8411215 |
ORBUS | 100 | 144,2352025 |
SOYTURK | 100 | 151,8535826 |
Ttec | 100 | 230,3582555 |
SOYTURK | 200 | 249,0654206 |
ORBUS | 200 | 294,2367601 |
If the calculation for price per ampere-hour, than it has been clearly seen which battery has low price.
Producer Capacity (Ah) Price (Euro) Price per Ampere-hour
Table 13. Batteries and their price per ampere-hour
Producer | Capacity (Ah) | Price (Euro) | Price per Ampere-hour |
---|---|---|---|
YIGITAKU | 100 | 274,7663551 | 2,7476636 |
ORBUS | 150 | 208,5669782 | 1,3904465 |
SOYTURK | 150 | 225,8411215 | 1,5056075 |
ORBUS | 100 | 144,2352025 | 1,442352 |
SOYTURK | 100 | 151,8535826 | 1,5185358 |
Ttec | 100 | 230,3582555 | 2,3035826 |
SOYTURK | 200 | 249,0654206 | 1,2453271 |
ORBUS | 200 | 294,2367601 | 1,4711838 |
200 Ah battery from SOYTURK company.
Battery size of the system calculated by:
Battery size= (Battery energy storage system capacity)/(Capacity of a single battery)
Table 14. Battery Size by month
Month | Battery Size |
---|---|
January | 400 |
February | 308 |
March | 327 |
April | 340 |
May | 290 |
June | 389 |
July | 370 |
August | 467 |
September | 398 |
October | 339 |
November | 318 |
December | 304 |
The maximum power from photovoltaic panels is 87,5 kW. Inverter should be withstand 1,2 - 1,3 times of the total power of the panels. That means; inverter should be withstand 113,7 kW power for this system. Two 80 kW inverters has been chosen for this project. The rated DC voltage input of this inverter is 384 volts. That means 32 batteries should be lined to get the rated input voltage for inverter to convert it to 380 (phase to phase) volts AC. The total battery size has been chosen 352 for this project.
Table 15. Total cost of the system
Components | Quantity | Price per Component | Total Cost |
---|---|---|---|
PV Panels | 350 | €305.4 | €106,890 |
Batteries | 352 | €250 | €88,000 |
Inverter | 2 | €26,700 | €53,400 |
Biogen System | 1 | €305,000 | €305,000 |
MPPT Chargers | 39 | €533.11 | €20,791.29 |
Area | 5 | €100,031.5 | €500,157.5 |
Additional costs | - | - | €100,000 |
Total | - | - | €1,174,239 |
Procedures for getting licence:
In this thesis, I tried to solve some problems for a single house complex. This complex had some energy shortages in time and each year more families deciding to stay in the complex. This creates more demand in the future and if energy shortages keeps going with that; then this complex will face a huge energy problem when all of the houses filled with families.
Nowadays; renewable energy sources and energy production from these sources are popular. The conventional power plants damage the environment badly and these power plants depend on the resources which is limited. Thus we need to use the renewable energy sources to produce energy to lower the damage to environment. But renewable energy sources are depends on the weather conditions. That means electricity production is unstable for these kind of technologies. But scientists are finding new solutions these problems, such as maximum power point tracker is used for getting maximum power from the photovoltaic panels or wind turbines. It will be better if these systems supported by storage systems as well. These kind of hybrid systems will be the solution for the future.
There are some villages which they have farmlands and diaries close to the complex. That brings easy access to the biological wastes and because of the location of this complex, it can get so much solar radiation from the sun and location has long sun durations. Solution for this complex is off-grid hybrid energy system.
All of the components are chosen from commercial equipments on the internet. It is possible to get better equipment when contacted with better producers. It can be make the system more efficient. Contact with the universities for better results for optimum photovoltaic panel angle, exact solar radiation and biomass analysis for Iskenderun District. That makes better analysis for photovoltaic system and biogas power plant.
Power Calculations for a Single House Complex. (2024, Feb 22). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/document/power-calculations-for-a-single-house-complex
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment