We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Check Writers' Offers

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and Get Writers' Offers

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

Why Elections Are Bad for Democracy

Paper type: Essay
Pages: 5 (1071 words)
Downloads: 46
Views: 236

So, the question asks are elections helpful for democracies? When I evaluate this question, I immediately consider the word democracy and the type of democracy that is executed within the U.S. The site “whatisdemocracy.net” explains democracy as the government by the people. The site likewise explains how individuals ought to be able to have their say in one method or another in whatever that affects their lives. Which Is why democracy is either direct (by every member of a neighborhood having the possibility to enter personally, without conciliators, his position on a specific concern into the decision making procedure) or by a representative democracy (chosen members of legal bodies).

In the U.S., representative democracy Is the type of democracy that is carried out. What this indicates is that we as citizens of the U.S. deserve to enact every election, and the liberty to vote for any candidate who takes part. On paper this procedure of democracy appears pain-free and more efficient for the average American.

But is the voice of the people really being represented by the people we elect in workplace? This is the question that connects in to the main concern on whether elections are best for democracy.

Knowing what we know now about democracy, and specifically representative democracy, we can easily see that part of being in a representative democracy depends on some sort of election. When talking about elections we also have to define this word in depth in order to shape the correlation with representative democracy. According to the Merriam-Webster’s dictionary, elections are defined as the right, power, or privilege of making a choice. Going back to representative democracy, the people or the majority of people, will utilize elections by making a choice on who to choose as their candidate for public office. This candidate will then go on to represent the people who are assigned to his or her constituency or community. This candidate is also expected to be the voice of the people who elected them in office. So why is there a problem? Why do we have concerns about elections being good for democracies? Well the problem leads to another rhetorical question, Are the people’s interest really being represented by the candidates we elect to represent us? As we began to break down the answer, I will add that my personal opinion to this question is, no. If I can say no to this question, I can probably say no to the main
question on elections being good for democracy.

With my personal answer being revealed. I can say that my reasons have some thoughts and reasoning behind my answer. The first thing is that the election process is categorize in two ways: the popular vote and the Electoral College. The two categories are very different in context. The Electoral College is a method of indirect popular election of the President of the United States (bensguide.gpo.gov). There is also the popular vote which is accumulated by the number of citizens who voted for a particular candidate. Now the popular vote’s influence is suppressed by the Electoral College which is the main decider of elections, especially presidential elections (people.howstuffworks.com). Now here’s a scenario for you, It’s election time and you are a voter who is about to cast his ballot and instead of your vote counting towards your choice of candidate, it is use to elect someone who you never seen before to cast your vote for you, if he or she decides to do so. Usually, electors are people who are politically active in their party (people.howstuffworks.com). This includes political activists, party leaders, elected officials of the state and even people who have personal or political ties to the presidential candidates (people.howstuffworks.com). Also the electors are chosen by each state’s party at state conventions. So basically the Electoral College takes the number of popular votes each state has per candidate and gives electoral votes based on the winner of each popular vote. But sometimes it gets complicated. Some electors abstain from voting, while others vote differently than they pledged to vote (people.howstuffworks.com). Today, a candidate must receive 270 of the 538 votes to win the election.

So what exactly is the problem? The problem is that the people’s votes our in the hands of the electorate and not the citizen themselves. The candidate who wins the popular vote doesn’t always win the election (people.howstuffworks.com). In better news, recent state laws have now mandated that their states have to give electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote, not just the state vote. These states are California, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia (which is considered a state in the Electoral
College) (people.howstuffworks.com)

In terms of the correlation between representative democracies versus the election process in the U.S., I will say that we are not really as representative of a democracy as people think we are. According to 1215.org the United States is a mixture of the two systems of government (Republican under Common Law, and democratic under statutory law). The People enjoy their God-given natural rights in the Republic. In a democracy, the Citizens enjoy only government granted privileges (also known as civil rights). From the article we can get a sense of where are representative democracy derives from, the democratic republic. Also I understand that a representative democracy gives people the freedom to live their lives as they please, while having the right to disagree with the decision. All of this makes it okay to continue to practice of “our” version of what democracy means. But the reality is a democracy needs to have more sovereign involvement from the people, in which our democracy currently doesn’t. What you get instead is a bunch of public opinion and not a lot of policy actions from the masses. Nowadays factory workers along with mountain enthusiasts use opinion columns to express themselves. Why this happens so much, I have no idea. But on the opposite side of the spectrum the people that our state electors elect from our votes only get a fraction of their policy agenda completed each year. WOW! So much for a democracy.

So in essence, elections really do mess up the context of what a democracy is supposed to look like. It’s supposed to include more power amongst the masses, instead the power is more pseudo because opinion has been considered power.

Cite this page

Why Elections Are Bad for Democracy. (2016, Apr 04). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/why-elections-are-bad-for-democracy-essay

How to Avoid Plagiarism
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Get help from professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Not Finding What You Need?

Search for essay samples now

image

Your Answer is very helpful for Us
Thank you a lot!