We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Why did Hinduism need to reform? Essay

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website!

In 1828 has traditionally been regarded as beginning of a new era in the history of the British India as it underwent one of the most significant changes in its history ever. Hinduism needed to reform due to several pressures that it was facing at the current time.

Firstly the mogul empire had overtaken India in the seventeenth century. Muslims fundamentally hold a monesthics belief. Their presence was particularly felt in the North of India, which is now known as Pakistan. The Muslim leaders of the Mughal Empire imposed shariah law and often attacked temples and images of Hindu deities. Many Hindu’s were converted to Islam by the incentives of a lack of caste system, there was much more of an official universal doctrine and Islam was based on the ummah (brotherhood) thus highlighting the equality of all humans. Although originally when Muslims invaded they destroyed literally millions of temples of the “infidels” and applied considerable pressure to convert them to Islam however, under more liberal emperors such as Akbar. Hindus were given the freedom to practise their own faith and even held significant positions in courts.

We will write a custom essay sample on Why did Hinduism need to reform? specifically for you
for only $16.38 $13.9/page

Order now

Furthermore, when the British Invaded they brought with them protestant Christianity as practised in Portugal. Along with them came the missionaries, which again imposed a monotheistic tradition. Missionaries were particularly critical about Hindu’s for the diverse beliefs about God and their view on afterlife (the process of samsara) Missionaries have said to have baptised literally millions of Hindu’s at this time. In addition, missionaries also opened schools, built churches and translated scriptures into Hindi.

British Colonialism made a significant impact upon the asian sub continent. Traditions such a sati were made illegal straight away which restricted some of their religious values, especially in upper class Brahmin villages. The British administration required a central government. This meant that there was a higher level of communication present such as telephones and transport, which had a profound effect on the social and cultural development of the country as a whole. The rise of such mass communication meant that ideas, beliefs and values spread quicker from different regions. Especially western ideas in this case.

Western Science and philosophy began to establish itself. Schools of thought from philosophers such as Mill and other Utilitarianists who promoted ideas stemming from rationalism and logic. For the Liberal minded a western education was the key to improving the lot of the average Hindu. Whereas for evangelical Christian the conversion to Christianity would offer India a new hope. These changes to the institutional, stuctrual and cultural fabric of society made life for the ordinary Hindu considerably more complex and thus many reform movements began to start in the hope of not only preserving Hinduism but finding the original truth which some felt had been lost.

How did it reform?

Different cultures and societies react in different ways to new influences and external pressures. I will mention some key reformers who either rejected, absorbed or experimented with the some of these influences according to their own personal religious and social beliefs

Ram Mohan Roy was born of a distinguished Brahmin family in Bengal. Essentially a humanist and religious reformer; he left his job to devote his time to the service of his people. Profoundly influenced by European liberalism, Ram Mohan came to the conclusion that radical reform was necessary in the religion of Hinduism and in the social practices of the Hindus. He founded the Brahmo Samaj at Calcutta in 1828, which was initially known as the “Brahmo Sabha.” In 1814 he formed the Atmiya Sabha and carried on a persistent struggle against the religious social problems, which were widely prevalent among the Hindus in Bengal. He therefore, opposed the worship of idols, the rigidity of caste, and the prevalence of meaningless religious rituals and condemned the priestly class for encouraging these practices.

His services to the cause of the abolition of suttee are well-known. By citing the authority of Upanishads he showed that the Hindu religion at its best was opposed to the practice but more than that he appealed to the reason and humanity and compassion of the people. He visited the burning ghats at Calcutta to try to persuade the relatives of widows to give up their plan of self-immolation.

He organised groups of like-minded people to keep a strict check on such performances and to prevent any attempt to force the widows to become sati. Finally, Sati was abolished by the government in 1829. He was the first feminist in India and his book, Brief remarks regarding modern encroachments on the ancient rights of females (1822), is a reasoned argument in favour of the equality of women. He condemned the subjugation of women and opposed the prevailing idea that women were inferior to men in intellect or in a moral sense. He attacked polygamy and the degraded state to which widows were often reduced. To raise the status of women he demanded that they be given the right of inheritance and property.

In addition He argued for the reform of Hindu law, led the protest against restrictions on the press, mobilised the Government against the oppressive land laws, argued the case for the association of Indians in Government and argued in favour of an English system of education in India. Therefore Ram Mohan Roy absorbed many of the key characteristics of the western world.

Another key reformer was Ramakrishna who was a Bengali saint. He had devoted his life to serving Goddess Kali in the mandir. His reaction to the western influence represents the most typical response so far.

Ramakrishna’s main ideas was to promote the universal religion. He apparently had visions of many religious figures from Christian and Muslim traditions. For him, there was no one truth.” God in the form of the saint, God in the form of the sinner, God in the form of the righteous, God in the form of the unrighteous. Every religion is correct as religion aims to encapture the truth and union with God. Therefore it is the desire for God that is needed rather how you practise it.”

Another important reform movement was the Arya Samaj, founded by Swami Dayanand Saraswati. He protested his voice against two main evils. Firstly, Idolatry, rituals and priesthood and the false teachings of Puranas. And secondly against the caste system and its deiscrimination against untouchability

According to Ramakrishna, to know God as the only Reality and the world as an unreality is jnana (knowledge). But he exhorts to go beyond that highest realization to have “vijnana”. He teaches us, “What is vijnana? It is knowing God in a special way. The awareness and conviction that fire exists in wood is jnana, knowledge. But to cook rice on that fire, eat the rice, and get nourishment from it is vijnana. To know by one’s inner experience that God exists is jnana. But to talk to Him, to enjoy Him as Child, as Friend, as Master, as Beloved, is Vijnana. The realization that God alone has become the Universe and all living beings is vijnana”

Vivekenanada was another interesting refomer since he did not believe in God with forms nor in images and temples. He never had faith in any particular scripture but promoted Shankara. He did not accept Prophets or Incarnations. With his intellectual approach, he challenged many of the known leaders of religions of his time. It was Swami Vivekananda, who introduced Vedanta to the West. He was the most applauded religious leader of the Parliament of Religions held at Chicago in 1893.

He established Ramakrishna Mission to spread the message of his Master. “Do this either by work, or worship or psychic control, or philosophy- by one, or more, or all of these- and be free”.” This is the whole of religion. Doctrines, or dogmas, or rituals, or books, or temples, or forms, are but secondary details”. Therefore Vivekenamda rejected many of his own traditions but did not absorb any of the external influences either such as Islamic and Christian traditions.

How to cite this page

Choose cite format:

Why did Hinduism need to reform?. (2017, Sep 14). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/why-did-hinduism-need-to-reform-essay

We will write a custom essay sample onWhy did Hinduism need to reform?specifically for you

for only $16.38 $13.9/page
Order now

Our customer support team is available Monday-Friday 9am-5pm EST. If you contact us after hours, we'll get back to you in 24 hours or less.

By clicking "Send Message", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.
No results found for “ image
Try Our service
online

Hi, I am Sara from Studymoose

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out https://goo.gl/CYf83b

online

Hi, I am Sara from Studymoose

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out https://goo.gl/CYf83b

image

Your Answer is very helpful for Us
Thank you a lot!