We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Check Writers' Offers

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and Get Writers' Offers

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

Wealth Against the Commonwealth According to Social Darwinism

Paper type: Essay
Pages: 2 (310 words)
Categories: Biology,Natural Selection,Science And Society,Social Darwinism,Wealth And Poverty
Downloads: 36
Views: 341

The Gilded Age

Introduction

Liberty describes the flexibility that is ensured for all residents and businesses to continue their activities with no prohibition as long as they are within the law. Monopoly on the other hand is specified as a business which is the sole seller of specific items or services within a certain market with no type of competition (Henry, 1894).

From the declaration by Henry Demarest Lloyd, that, “Liberty and monopoly can not cohabit.” Based on understanding on the commercial revolution as well as the gilded age, I tend to concur with this view that monopoly and liberty can not exist at the very same time.

Liberty suggests anyone can participate in any kind of business whereas monopoly denies other individuals the chance or liberty to participate in particular companies(Henry, 1894). Industrial transformation brought more opportunities and opened markets for all people to take part in business. The gilded age likewise brought quick financial advancement for this reason preventing the presence of monopoly.

However, due to corruption and arguments, monopolies continued to exits thus eliminating liberty in companies.

Social Darwinism refers to theories which emerged in 1870s. This view supports the biological concepts whereby natural selection takes place and those that are the fittest are able to survive, politically and socially. Liberty or monopoly does not require any form of biological application (Robert, 2000). Liberty provides freedom to everyone while monopoly is for certain selected businesses hence social Darwinism cannot be applicable. However, considering that not all people or businesses are strong enough to survive competition, I think Social Darwinism may also stand up against the view by Lloyd.

References

  1. Henry Demarest Lloyd (1894). Wealth Against the Commonwealth. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers, 1898 (originally published 1894). 1-2. Viewed from http://www.etsu.edu/cas/tahg/pictures/ModernAmerica/Wealth%20Against%20the%20Commonwealth.pdfon 22nd November 2014
  2. Robert C. Bannister (2000),Social Darwinism, viewed from HYPERLINK http://autocww.colorado.edu/~toldy2/E64ContentFiles/SociologyAndReform/SocialDarwinism.html on 22nd November 2014

Cite this essay

Wealth Against the Commonwealth According to Social Darwinism. (2015, Nov 25). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/wealth-against-the-commonwealth-according-to-social-darwinism-essay

How to Avoid Plagiarism
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Get help from professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Not Finding What You Need?

Search for essay samples now

image

Your Answer is very helpful for Us
Thank you a lot!