The post, “Vegetarian is the New Prius”, written by Kathy Freston, goes over the quantity of contribution that animals actively plays in the most crucial and severe environmental problem, from a regional scale to worldwide scale. Freston composes that the amount of animals raised in United States soil is the main reason for air contamination, land degradation, water scarcity, water contamination, biodiversity, and particularly aids to worldwide warming. This post tries to convince readers to cut meat out of their diet plan and to end up being vegetarians, so that less livestock would be raised to feed individuals and environmental issues would be reduced.
Although it is true that Freston provides the audience with solid, legitimate factual arguments concerning the brutal slaughtering and consumption of livestock by humans, she fails to address the opposing argument. Although I am a personal fan of vegetarian foods, I disagree with Freston, primarily because my family has raised me on chicken and other meats. I believe that there will be livestock whether a lot of people change their diets and become vegetarians or not.
At the University of Chicago, researches concluded that feeding animals for the production of meat, eggs, and dairy products requires growing upwards of ten times as many crops needed than if we just went without livestock. According to a report done by the United Nations animal agriculture takes up 70% of all agricultural land, and 30% of the total land surface of the planet. Upon seeing these disturbing facts, I do not believe that society will never 100% convert to a vegetarian lifestyle.
Even if they do, there will still be millions of wild animals producing all of the same gases that are so harmful to our environment.
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.get help with your assignment