United States Government Resistance Rights

Presented in the embedded code of the United States of America are political laws and then there are individuals who are in opposition of the law with liberal differentiating point of views. Political being “relating to the government or the public affairs of a country,” and liberal meaning, “opinions and willing to discard traditional values,” 2 it is clearly to recognize exactly why resistance in the government would exist. In the law itself there are different judicial systems pertaining to the law for an unlawful judiciary, in accordance with the constitutional values.

Granted, legislation itself includes a substantial extent of contest. In this case, at what point is it permitted to resist from the Government. Proceeding by refusal to detainment rather what creates these technicalities suitable unlawful.

The curiosity arises as to the ultimate conclusion of particular terms and regulations along with what’s presently conventional. Although what generates a conclusion in scenarios where civil disobedience becomes a non violent act. Civil disobedience being’ “the refusal to comply with certain laws or to pay taxes and fines, as a peaceful form of political protest”, and non violent acts meaning, “ peacefully resistant, as in response to or protest against injustice, especially on moral or philosophical grounds”, for better words.

Technically civil disobedience could be a nonviolent action , for example a protest in opposition. In such scenario what are the obligations citizens are lawfully permitted to commit in the proceeding.

Perhaps presented accounted for there is an awareness of the overly sophisticated literature of legislation and regulation, thus fashioning positions in the direction of illiteracy.

Top Writers
Belle
Verified expert
4.7 (657)
Dr. Karlyna PhD
Verified expert
4.7 (235)
Doctor Jennifer
Verified expert
5 (893)
hire verified writer

Due to the unfamiliarity, frequent grounds and foundations turn out oblivious. Laws differ between states and are limited amongst citizens in the United States. A majority of citizens possess absolutely no sector warranted accreditation to resist distinct standing for instance, detainment. A considerable unlawful arrest would be an illegal arrest of assault and battery. A formal and authorized order of an unlawful arrest or false arrest would entitle, “a civil wrong that consists of an unlawful restraint of an individual’s personal liberty or freedom of movement by another purporting to act according to the law”.

Suppose a lawful approach to resist the law. In contest to whatever disagreements may arise , what develops if a citizen decided to resist their government and what measures are considered lawful in action? An individual attempt to be restrained of their liberty possesses the equality and rights to utilize restraint and put opposition as they would proceed in defense against any other situation of opinion. Reckoned ultimately examining when to the law an accommodation with the rights of a citizen belonging to the United States of America which is conclusionary. Many can agree to disagree in sight of what is justifiable when it comes to the duty of a citizen. Although as the responsibility of civil manner and demeanor then what would contest as a reliable source of civil disobedience. Vaguely, what is the duty of a citizen to resist to their government?

Dual theory of ownership, one of many examples that share similarities and are mentioned in terms of civil disobedience as well as nonviolent acts to resist government are Henry David Thoreau, an American transcendentalist studying philosophy and determination for justice in equality in the passing of the 1800s, and Martin Luther King, “ an American Baptist minister and activist who became the most visible spokesperson and leader in the civil rights movement from 1954”, until his passing . Both men equally distributed their own methods toward the equality and fairness of their constitutional values.

In accordance to Henry David Thoreau, he persisted that a person of solitude should withdraw from permitting authority to overrule or degenerate their conscious. That being said he assured his theory persist that typically government served in an unjust manner, and democracy was no solution for equality. Thoreau considered that “they have a duty to avoid allowing such acquiescence to enable the government to make them the agents of injustice.”

Concluding Thoreau’s theory that government is harmful and unjust.

How should a man behave towards a government today Thoreau states, “that he cannot without disgrace be associated with it”. He proceeds by stating,

‘I am too high­born to be propertied, To be a secondary at control, Or useful serving­man and instrument to any sovereign state throughout the world.’He who gives himself entirely to his fellow­men appears to them useless and selfish; but he who gives himself partially to them is pronounced a benefactor and philanthropist.”

Thoreau also expressed other duties to resist an unfavorable government by this belief:

“ It is not a man’s duty, as a matter of course, to devote himself to the ER room diction of any, even the most in Normas wrong; he may still properly have other concerns to you engage him; but it is his duty, at least to wash his hands off of it and… Not to give it particularly his support.”

Thoreau insisted that if you’re not apart of a government who deciphers cruelty over equality , to simply exclude from any participations. Although with Thoreau’s theory he participated in not participating in the uncomplicated way of excluding himself from paying taxes. Repercussions from his objection led him to do time in jail. He attempted to not pay his state taxes in protest against slavery , he was shortly after arrested and sent to jail for his delinquent balance of taxes. His realization after being in jail was, “under government which in prisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also a prison.”

In this reason what is conclusionary is to present oneself towards the government or authority in a non-rebellious manner that influences the law negatively but to converse verbally in a non-violent or threatening demeanor. Martin Luther King demonstrated civil disobedience in a lawful way that is even presented in liberal democracy currently. Kings belief was:

“Nonviolence is a powerful and just weapon. Which cuts without wounding and in norms the man who will pass it. It is a sword that heals. . Amber not in the violent army, there’s room for everyone who wants to join up. There is no color distinction. There is no examination, no pledge, except that, as a soldier in the army as a violence is expected to inspect his carbon and keep it clean, nonviolent soldiers are called upon to examine their greatest weapons: their heart, their conscious, their current and sense of justice.”

Despite Kings initial review towards the movement for the equality of African-Americans during the 1960 years, his empowering demonstrations of non-violence protest are still relevant and inspiring many today. Creating unity in the opposing side of inequality political rights obtained rewarding outcomes throughout history. Nonviolent act , peaceful protest, and reconciliation movements have lead to meaningful systemic change. Reflecting on the diversity in evolution can perform as a pilot for activity in these troublesome generations to advance equality for all everyone in humanity.

Mentioning the troublesome generations, here are a few demonstrators who played part in civil disobedience and nonviolent acts. Delano Grape Boycott, Suffrage Parade, and Montgomery bus Boycott.

Cesar Chavez participating in advocacy for peaceful resolution protest and boycotts for the abuse of American farm , Chaves led part in a twenty five day hunger strike which blossomed into change with the legislation. Chaves have all played part in a five year strike “I am convinced that the truest act of courage, the strongest act of humanity, is to sacrifice ourselves for others in a totally non violent struggle for justice.” – Cesar Chavez.

1913 Suffrage Parade shares the heart of many women who spoke about the rights in equality for political participation. “We are here, not because we are law-breakers; we are here in our efforts to become law-makers.” – Emmeline Pankhurst.

Last but not the least Rosa Park in Montgomery bus Boycott as she refuses to give her seat to a white passenger. Due to the injust of reality the U.S Supreme Court ruled segregation on public bus unconstitutional.

“People always say that I didn’t give up my seat because I was tired, but that isn’t true. I was not tired physically, or no more tired than I usually was at the end of a working day. I was not old, although some people have an image of me as being old then. I was forty-two. No, the only tired I was, was tired of giving in.” — Rosa Parks.

In political philosophy, the right of revolution (or right of rebellion) is the right or duty of the people of a nation to overthrow a government that acts against their common interests and/or threatens the safety of the people without cause” A moral approach to opposition your opponent when it happens to be the government you’d question yourself , who are you ? What are you willing to conduct and stand for? Is what I I stand for stand for morally valuable to myself and others ? Then from there you come to clear judgement

Constitutional Rights

In addition to the subsequent material combined both professionally educated and philosophical theory, what is in comparison to the thought on civil and non-civil viewpoints. Disregarding the differentiating aspects the actuality of what is further more complex than a basic opinion and perception of what would be the constitutional law.

Now it is clear as to what methods should be utilized to resist the government. Typically embedded laws compared to exempting your tax by choice could lead to unwanted imprisonment. Actions that include violence of unlawful act will insure jail time. Therefore in comparison to the examples provided in this research, the most reasonable example would be a non violent act in protest. Those in opposition with whatever field of source has the right and free of speech to voice their opinions. Knowing when enough is enough and how far the resistance should is simply generated by the knowledge and wisdom of the trial and error the limit would include any violent pursuates.

When issues arise of assault and battery those participating should refrain from such behavior. Also including the extent of protest that is a strike of what you are willing to sacrifice, your hunger , your education, your freedom. Precaution yourself to the possibility that some strikes can lead to improvement like Thoreau , or starve yourself like Chavez. Lastly , compromise. When should a government resistance leader or follower compromise? Simply that is of the choice of the protester . Being a passionate advocate of belief fights until positive embracing change is brought upon society. There’s being stated like the many in history have cited to conquer dreams for equality and fight for the purity in rights for humanity.

Work Cited

  1. Merriam-Webster Dictionary’. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 2015. Retrieved June 24, 2015
  2. Merriam-Webster Dictionary’. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 2015. Retrieved June 24, 2015
  3. Merriam-Webster Dictionary’. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 2015. Retrieved June 24, 2015
  4. Merriam-Webster Dictionary’. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 2015. Retrieved June 24, 2015
  5. Merriam-Webster Dictionary’. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 2015. Retrieved June 24, 2015
  6. MLA (Modern Language Assoc.) Thoreau, Henry David. Walden & On the Duty of Civil Disobedience. Project Gutenberg. Accessed 7 Feb. 2019.
  7. APA (American Psychological Assoc.) Thoreau, H. D. (n.d.). Walden & On the Duty of Civil Disobedience. Champaign, Ill: Project Gutenberg.

Cite this page

United States Government Resistance Rights. (2021, Apr 26). Retrieved from http://studymoose.com/united-states-government-resistance-rights-essay

Are You on a Short Deadline? Let a Professional Expert Help You
HELP ME WITH WRITING
Let’s chat?  We're online 24/7