The United States has the right to determine if Iran is allowed to develop nuclear weapons Essay

Custom Student Mr. Teacher ENG 1001-04 19 March 2017

The United States has the right to determine if Iran is allowed to develop nuclear weapons

Thesis Statement:

Countries with huge stockpiles of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons have no moral authority to tell any country not to develop nuclear weapons. An international movement to eliminate these weapons from the face of the earth will eliminate this danger from the world.

Statement 1:

In my opinion nuclear weapons pose a major threat to the world and no country in the world should be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. Unfortunately the way Non Proliferation Treaty was designed it only protected the global hegemony of the victors of the 2nd World War. Under this context United States is fully entitled to stop any country from becoming more powerful than the victors of the Second World War and she did. We tried to prevent India, China, Pakistan and North Korea from developing nuclear weapons but failed

North Korea which feels extremely threatened by United States and is building missiles and nuclear weapons to counter the perceived threat and has just agreed to give-up its nuclear weapon(s) in exchange for assurances and aid, the remaining nuclear weapon states have succeeded in being accepted as such. According to IAEA, Iran is nowhere near acquiring a nuclear weapon, but the noose being tightened around Iran puts it in a similar position as North Korea. United States being the sole superpower has every right to try to stop any country from challenging its authority but this is based on its superpower status and ability to do so, not on morality of keeping and using these destructive weapons.

Statement 1: citation

Paul Kerr, (2006), HIRC Markup, US-India Nuclear Deal, [Online], retrieved from Internet on 28 February 2007, http://www.armscontrolwork.com/US-India Nuclear Deal.htm

The comments regarding the powers exercised by nuclear states against non-nuclear states is one factor resulting in proliferation:

Simple. Any country that is threatened by nukes should be able to develop a deterrent of its own. The likes of the US and China understand only one language. For example: A terrorist supporting, destabilizing and non nuclear Iraq is considered a rogue state while a terrorist supporting, destabilizing and nuclear Pakistan is a key US ally. Nuclear weapons are a must to have a status in this world. If you have them, the world will listen to you even if you are a rogue. If you don’t have them, you are nobody”.

Moore, J. C., (2006), Israeli Nuclear Hegemony: Why Shouldn’t Iran Have Nuclear Weapons? The Independent, May 1, 2006, [Online], retrieved from Internet on 28 February 2007

http://www.aljazeerah.info/News%20archives/2006%20News%20Archives/May/1%20n/Israeli%20Nuclear%20Hegemony%20Why%20Shouldn’t%20Iran%20Have%20Nuclear%20Weapons%20By%20James%20C.%20Moore.htm

As international political powers seek Iran’s capitulation on nuclear weapons development, little notice is given to what the Americans and the British have done to create this crisis nor what steps the Israelis might eventually take to make it profoundly more complicated.

Iran’s antipathy toward the West has been spurred by what Iranians see as hypocrisy on the part of members of the world’s nuclear community, and the bumbled meddling of the US and UK in Iranian affairs for more than a half century.

Iran is dangerous, but the British and the Americans have helped to make it that way. And the situation is even more precarious than it appears

Nuclear weapons were presented as deterrence against a foreign threat and an instrument of keeping peace by all superpowers. The same argument when advanced by other countries is not accepted but is a valid argument

Krieger, D., Prospects for Preventing Nuclear Proliferation, Global Dialogue, Vol. 8, No.1-2, Winter Spring 2006, Also available online:

http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/2006/06/28_krieger_prospects-preventing.htm

In 1945, the United States became the world’s sole nuclear power, and almost immediately used its new weapons on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  In the decade and a half following the Soviet Union’s development of nuclear arms, the UK, France and then China also developed nuclear weapons. 

By 1967, the five declared nuclear weapons states formed an exclusive club.  They were the only states with nuclear weapons, and they were all permanent members of the United Nations Security Council.  As such, these nations had considerable prestige in the world.  They all justified their nuclear arsenals on the basis of deterrence – the threat to retaliate to a first-strike nuclear attack – and all but China, which had pledged “No First Use” of nuclear weapons, held open the possibility of responding to a conventional attack with nuclear force.

.

Statement 2

United States does not have a uniform policy in treating the threat of nuclear non-proliferation. When our strategic interests justify we are prepared to overlook violations of NPT and even possession of nuclear weapons by friendly countries. This partisan attitude is detrimental to states unfriendly to United States from trying to acquire nuclear weapons.


Citation 2

After the initial restrictions on India and Pakistan, United States has accepted these two countries in Nuclear Club. Apartheid South Africa had nuclear weapons which were abandoned by the new Mandela regime. Israel is said to have more than 200 nuclear weapons but no one hears of these weapons.

“US-India nuclear deal is the demise of NPT”

Paul Kerr, (2006), HIRC Markup, US-India Nuclear Deal, [Online], retrieved from Internet on 28 February 2007, http://www.armscontrolwork.com/US-India Nuclear Deal.htm

Moore, J. C., (2006), Israeli Nuclear Hegemony: Why Shouldn’t Iran Have Nuclear Weapons? The Independent, May 1, 2006,

“If Israel has US nuclear weaponry pointed at Iran, the position of the country’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khomeini, becomes more politically supportable by his people. Despite the fact that Israel has been developing nuclear material since 1958, the country has never formally acknowledged it has a nuclear arsenal. Analysts have estimated, however, that Israel is the fifth-largest nuclear power on the planet with much of its delivery systems technology funded by US taxpayers. To complicate current diplomatic efforts, Israel, like Pakistan and India, has refused to sign the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty even as it insists in the international discourse that Iran be stopped from acquiring what Israel already has


Statement 3:

United States will be in a better position to support international nuclear disarmament if it agreed to global denuclearization. In the short term just isolating Iran, Syria and North Korea as the axis of evil and criticizing these countries is deemed as threatening behavior by these countries and creates an urgency to obtain ‘deterrence’ as so vocally argued by the five nuclear powers to defend their nuclear arsenal.

citation3

“More effort needs to be directed towards nuclear, chemical and biological weapons disarmament.”

Kile, S. and Hart J., (2002), ‘Preventing Mass-Destruction Terrorism and Weapons Proliferation, Monterey Nonproliferation Strategy Group meeting, 506 September 2002, Stockholm, Sweden

Conclusion/Reflection Statement

United States and other superpowers are all maintaining huge stockpiles of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and only allowing the countries to develop the technology which do not threat their power or indeed support their strategic interests. This policy is correct for a superpower which wants to use its power to prevent any other country from becoming a threat to its power. This means that any country which can defy the international norm and the will of the existing nuclear club can do so because the philosophy is not based on a moral argument. Iran is nowhere near the point which North Korea achieved with all the controls and threats of United States.

I believe an international mechanism needs to be created where the world does not need the nuclear, biological and chemical weapons and United States or any other nuclear state does not have to tell the others “Don’t do as I do, Do as I say”

Free The United States has the right to determine if  Iran is allowed to develop nuclear weapons Essay Sample

A

  • Subject:

  • University/College: University of Arkansas System

  • Type of paper: Thesis/Dissertation Chapter

  • Date: 19 March 2017

  • Words:

  • Pages:

We will write a custom essay sample on The United States has the right to determine if Iran is allowed to develop nuclear weapons

for only $16.38 $12.9/page

your testimonials