The Right to Be Heard in Democracy

To a normal evening three Rwandan youngsters sitting on the courtyard ready to hear the ancient anecdotes from their begetter. The topic was the hospitalization of the Rwandan top directors to their citizens from 1959-1994. Speaking from the know-how our father which he received from the endeavor he met in his juvenile as he was born in 1961 his family was pushed to flee their agrarian(Rwanda) as their ethnicity wasn’t constitutional. To him, he has never seen a fair leadership style whereby people freely conduct the policies, actions and affairs of the state by themselves until when the country was liberated in 1994 after the genocide against Tutsi.

That noteworthy night left me with an authentic rationale of democracy which is a system of ministry in which the citizens freely oversee themselves and through which the administrative and law-making function is subjected to individuals embraced by the community that enables the equality in voices as there isn’t any greater pursuit than that of equal tone.

Get quality help now

RhizMan

Verified writer

Proficient in: Democracy

4.9 (247)

“ Rhizman is absolutely amazing at what he does . I highly recommend him if you need an assignment done ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

This makes democracy paramount on a larger extent on the grounds that when there is equality in the voices there is an ebb in the malfeasance, the nation becomes vigorous and well-heeled, education fosters, promotes change and democracy allows the legal protection.

It is clear that the human kind want to animate in the kind of political contestations that offers the right to be heard and listened to. Basing on the experience of my father’s juvenile the far-reaching of democracy is essential by virtue of no one is discriminated against on the basis of their race, ethnic group or gender and no one may be arrested, or exiled arbitrary as the generic inhabitants plays a vital role in the decision making of their nation.

Democracy is different from monarchies, oligarchies and dictatorship because it gives a rise to the scorn of the concerns from minorities because the majority has different ideas. In a democracy, whatever the majority says goes, and everyone who isn’t in the majority doesn’t get what he wants.

Hinged on ourworldindata.org, democratic countries are healthier. Looking at the data on child mortality there is a significant difference in autocratic countries (countries whereby the political preferences can’t be expressed and citizens aren’t guaranteed civil liberties) and democratic nations because few autocratic countries achieved a child mortality below 10 per 1000 whereas in democratic countries often have child mortality rates below 10 or even 5 per 1000. Not only democratic countries are healthier but also they are richer than autocratic nations. The latest observations from GDP (Gross Domestic Product), no countries that aren’t in democracy has an income of more than 15,000 international-$ if it is not heavily dependent on fossil fuel export. Countries that are not democratically ruled and don’t have option to export fossil fuels are poor as ourworldindata.org shows which reveals the far-reaching of the democracy.

Academically, democracy is inseparable with education. It has been conceded on all hands that the sinew of democracy depends upon the character and the intelligence of all its citizens. In democracy education is pre-eminent because it is the only pre-requisite for the survival and success of the nation. Likely, education fosters a democratic humor in the minds of people. Democratic scruples like equality, liberty and sharing of responsibilities are reinforced to education to make it more relevant and useful. Citizens that are equipped with these values don’t only perk the democracy but also aid the typical living conditions of the mass. Furthermore, democracy imparts political education to the people, for example during elections political parties propose their agenda and procedures in support of their candidates through public meetings, televisions, radios and speeches by their leaders to win public favor. All these can convey the political consciousness among the people.

This bureaucratic system can endorse the changes in the government without having to resort to any form of violence. The elected officials can’t stay in power for as long as they want because they bound by the constitution where they have to end their terms in office. In Rwanda, for example, presidential elections are held and the president can only run for two terms, with a total of 10 years. Ergo, none can be in power for a long time just like in the authoritarianism. If a leader wasn’t adequate to perform well while in office, the residents can have the assurance that they can opt to some better government officials. Due to the range of political parties available in a democracy, there will be the existence of potential leaders to choose from.

The other far-reaching aspect of a democracy is its legal system. In Rwanda, all citizens are given legal rights guaranteeing, for example a speedy trial. A democracy’s inherent respect for human rights to an incriminated person ensure that all people are fairly tried and given the convenience to defend themselves. The right of accused is further sheltered in a democratic community by guaranteeing that a convicted person will not be subjected to torment or inhumane forfeiture.

Thence, democracy tends to foster human development as measured by health, personal income and other indicators more fully than other forms of government do. This makes democracy a choice of the mass from a deck of different forms of government as it is remarkable in amounting the value of the majorities by granting the rights to freely govern themselves.