For years, the death penalty was a way of solving problems with criminals. In the past, it was normal for this to be done in front of an audience and people would enjoy it. Ever since a death sentence was the way to deal with criminals. At present, in America and many other countries, execution usually would be done if someone had made violations like murder, treason or war crimes. It is considered as a government-sanctioned practice which is used to punish someone, who committed above-mentioned crimes.
It is true that criminals have to be penalized somehow, but the death penalty is not the solution to this problem.
The question is why the death penalty has to be banned. Killing people is one of the things that God forbids to be done. However, in some countries, there is a capital punishment and most importantly the court is still allowing it. This is sinister because the death penalty is against our basic human right and human nature in general.
Moreover, that the law is not always fair. There are a lot of cases where an innocent person was punished for something that he or she never did. Last but not least, there are a lot of people who grieve and wish for revenge, but that way the criminal may not understand his mistake. Only by serving their sentence, may he be thought a lesson.
Why is the death sentence against humanity? First of all, killing the villain does not make us any different than them.
It is a proven fact that humans are the most intelligent beings on the planet. However, people still act like animals. The human life is a creation of God, not of the state. Does the State have the right to take away something it did not create? The state did not give people life, therefore, it has no ethical right to take it away. And yet there are a lot of states in which murder is a crime and the state itself practices murder as a punishment. Death punishment means that the law responded to violence with violence. Other peoples humans life is not ours to take. If a criminal has killed a person, he has to be punished so that he and the public understand that this is an illegal act. But if his conviction is a death penalty, it would confuse society and would mean that the deprivation of human life for some is punishable, and for others not. Of course, this is unacceptable, as everyone is equal before the law.
The death penalty can be a fatal decision. When a court makes a mistake, it turns into a crime of the State, and there is no compensation for that. Inaccurate or inadequate evidence, improper conduct of investigations, and similar mistakes by investigators or other law enforcement agencies, errors that are still human and completely possible, and in most cases, totally unintentional and unconscious, would lead to the murder of an innocent person. One wrong executed on this planet makes the prohibition of the death penalty a moral duty of any society that considers itself to be ‘advanced’.If those people who had been in the wrong place at the wrong time or they got framed by the real criminal and were sentenced to life imprisonment, their relatives, friends, and lawyers would find a way of proving their innocence and taking them back home. After their hearts stop beating, however, it becomes impossible. Death is an irreversible process.
Another thing, it is true that it is not moral to execute someone, even if the government is allowed to do it. However, some people say that the death sentence should be obligatory. This subject is painful for many people. Some define it as a cruel and ruthless final measure of justice, others as a just punishment for murderers and criminals. The near-dead and injured people and children are praying that a death sentence will be lawfully adopted and enforced to have retribution. At these moments, they are hardly thinking whether this is moral and ethical. Following the ancient law: ‘An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth,’ which satisfies our natural desire for vengeance, some may say: ‘Death to the murderer’. Can death, as revenge, restore what we have lost? Even if the murderer is killed, that won’t cure the pain of the grieving. They will continue to carry it with them all their lives and will add to the pain the hidden guilt of taking another human life. There is a reason why one of the Ten Commandments is ‘Thou shalt not kill’. Even if we are not that religious, that does not mean we have to kill others. Death would be an easy escape from the demolished life. Assuming that a killer is a man, who lost his idea of what is good and what evil, unconscious of right and wrong, killing him, we deprive him of the opportunity to ever understand. Remaining alive, though, without freedom, he has the chance to change.
It is difficult to make a decision to whether to let a person live or die. It is difficult from a moral point of view and ethical too. Perhaps that is why in most countries the death penalty is abolished and does not apply. Maybe because it’s easier. Maybe because it’s running away from responsibility. Maybe because it should. Maybe if the command of Christ ‘Love Your Neighbor’ is at the head of everyone at any time then there will be no need for these decisions. Perhaps then there will be no crimes.