Tartuffe Act IV and V Analysis

Act IV

Cléante tries in vain to put Tartuffe in front of her responsibilities. He is the cause of the dismissal of Damis. When it comes to inheritance, he tells him that he has no legitimacy to benefit from it. Tartuffe remains intractable: he will not intervene to help Damis and he can not refuse this donation. Marianne, whose fate seems sealed, delivers to her father her despair at being promised to Tartuffe. Elmire then decides to act. Faced with the incredulity and blindness of her husband, she offers him to bring him proof of the hypocrisy of his protege.

She asks Orgon to hide under the table so that he can attend an interview that will have no other purpose than to reveal the true personality of Tartuffe. Then comes Tartuffe who is at first suspicious. Then, very quickly, he begins an assiduous court with Elmire. At once furious and collapsed, Orgon intervenes and orders Tartuffe to leave the premises.

Get quality help now

Sweet V

Verified writer

Proficient in: Theatre

4.9 (984)

“ Ok, let me say I’m extremely satisfy with the result while it was a last minute thing. I really enjoy the effort put in. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

Alas, it's too late. Tartuffe reminds Orgon that he has donated her goods in the afternoon and that it is he, now, Tartuffe who is the owner of the house.

Act V

The hypocrisy of Tartuffe is now obvious to everyone. Orgon, deeply marked by events, swears that he will never trust people of good. Madame Pernelle, incredulous, still wants to believe in the integrity of Tartuffe. It will require the arrival of Mr. Loyal, bailiff, in charge of an order to evacuate the premises by Orgon and his family, so that it confesses its error and its blindness.

Cléante hopes that there is still a way to thwart the black designs of Tartuffe. But new twist. We learn from Valère that Tartuffe used the tape Orgon had given him to denounce the king as an accomplice of the slingers. He must escape urgently if he does not want to be stopped. Too late. Arrive Tartuffe and a police commissioner. But last blow of theater. The affair reached the prince's ears. The latter, remembering the loyalty of Orgon during the Fronde, decides to return all his property and imprisoned Tartuffe, already known for previous scams. The whole family breathes and praises the goodness of the Monarch. We will finally be able to celebrate the marriage of Valère and Mariane.

Tartuffe is known to be an examination of passionate false worship in separating to real Christian morals. Hypocrite might be a trickster since he shows up of remarkable commitment and passionate devotion though unpretentiously driving an actual existence of bad behaviour and indecent conduct. However as a drama student, it's important to understand reasons behind a play. "we do not now search the plays for the sens cache, which will reveal Molière's personal history."7 I have come to an understanding that, Molière created Tartuffe not to sentence composed religion or religious individuals but rather to pleased the King at the time. To sentence lip benefit and to instructed social events of a individuals, using funniness, 'CHARACTER MANIPULATION' on the noteworthiness of control, presence of mind, and clear considering in all zones of life. Regardless of the way that the play was at first censured as an all things considered strike on religion and committed people, an appropriate examining suggests reasonable the converse.

Religion isn't the issue; or possibly, the maltreatment of religion for individual get up at the expense of guiltless, confused people is Molière's worry. Works, for example, Tartuffe as a general rule offer help to anchor and advance religion by revealing impostors for who they really are and delineating the veritable risk they stance to society when they go unchallenged. The play's real complement is on the silly anyway veritable comes to fruition of crashing and burning to act with sound judgment. The reactions of the distinctive characters of the play to the scoundrel, Tartuffe, certainly help social event to remember individuals of the noteworthiness of clear considering in reality as we know it. But It is also important for us to admit that, "line for line", Molière is not a funny writer. "His comedy is almost exclusively either psychological or situational, rather than verbal"8 which leads me to our next question. 'Qui est vraiment l'hypocrite ? Tartuffe? L'imposteur ou le propriétaire de la maison'?