SWOT Analysis of BRICS Financial Cooperation

SWOT Analysis of BRICS Financial Cooperation

BRICS [ 1 ] becomes a freshly lifting star aiming regional fiscal cooperation at the background of globalisation and fiscal integrating. From its annual acme to run intoing amidst Brisbane G20 acme, every measure of this group attracts attending from other G20 members. Similar to G20, BRICS attaches great importance to fiscal cooperation, for illustration, economic system ( 33 % of the discourse ) and finance ( about 20 % ) rule its dockets ( Marina Larionova and Mark Rakhmangulov, 2012 ) . In this paper, BRICS fiscal cooperation is studied by following SWOT analysis and deductions are given.

The purpose of this survey is to analyse BRICS fiscal cooperation objectively and give intimations in countries that BRICS can interrupt through to accomplish better cooperation with G20.

Soon, research on BRICS fiscal cooperation remains few by and large, which are besides chiefly theoretical. Chun-Yao Tseng ( 2009 ) analyzes innovation capableness of BRICS states and concludes the strengths and failing of them severally. Vivek Bhargava et Al. ( 2011 ) , based on theory of involvement rate para, believe that farther liberalisation of fiscal market among BRIC states increases the integrating of their currencies into planetary fiscal market.

Get quality help now

Bella Hamilton

Verified writer

Proficient in: China

5 (234)

“ Very organized ,I enjoyed and Loved every bit of our professional interaction ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

Robert Kappel ( 2011 ) surveies development impulse of BRIC states by roll uping economic indexs from World Bank and contends that BRIC cooperation forms a large challenge to Europe and US economic system. Sang Baichuan et Al. ( 2012 ) give position on steps to farther deepen fiscal cooperation from facets of the current state of affairs, jobs, and chances of BRICS, so as to advance trading and economic development. Wu Guoping and Wang Fei ( 2013 ) illustrate chances and challenges for BRICS states.

Similarly, Hu Qilin and Zhang Hanlin ( 2013 ) come up with cooperation schemes for BRICS fiscal cooperation, such as cultivating BRICS bond market and organizing BRICS fiscal cooperation council. Sing the fact that none of the old literature provides a SWOT analysis, this paper will be extended from this point of view.

IStrength

The eruption of 2008 planetary fiscal crisis highlights the BRICS countries` good public presentation, besides enlightens them to seek for better hereafter. For BRICS members sharing great commonalty and good complementarity in economic system and finance, coaction peculiarly in finance is the best pick. Naturally, the commonalty and complementarity are going the really endogenous strength for BRICS. Their commonalty lies in economic growing, backed up by attractive immense land country, large population, rich natural resource. Being both developing states and emerging markets, most of the five states are transcending western economic systems in growing rate late, when western economic systems are wholly shell daze ( see chart 1 ) . The comparative growing advantage Fosters financial and fiscal development in each members, which can be partially manifested in the addition of foreign modesty. Brazil, Russia, India, and China are among the top 10 foreign modesty states, with entire modesty making $ 4.6 trillion, three one-fourth of universe sum ( Wu Guoping and Wang Fei, 2013 ) . It is no admiration that BRICS states have become the most favorite investing finish ( see chart 2 ) , puting a good foundation for fiscal cooperation.

Chart 1 GDP Growth Rate in BRICS, US, and Euro (2010—2013)

Beginning: Hu Qiwei and Zhang Hanlin, “A Study on Cooperation Strategy for BRICS Members, ” Inthernational Trade, Vol. 6, 2013.

Chart 2 Inflows of FDI in BRICS Countries

Beginning: BRICS Joint Statistical Publication 2014.

But they besides have large complementarities in their factor gift advantage. Namely, Brazil is a celebrated agricultural state, known as “a raw-materials backyard” ; China, leader in fabrication, is praised as “world`s fabrication factory” ; India`s package industry enjoys a great repute in the universe, which gives it a name of “the world`s office” ; Russia is the biggest oil and gas exporter, therefore regarded as “the world`s energy and gas station” ; South Africa is one of the five biggest mineral provinces, world`s biggest gold and Pt exporters, and leader in deep-ocean excavation. In all, India and China are fabricating states when Brazil, Russia, and South Africa are resource states. These complementarities help to organize typical circles of trade and investing, which can further advance fiscal cooperation. Between 2002 and 2012, intra-BRICS trade increased 922 % , from $ 27 to 276 billion, while between 2010-2012, BRICS international trade rose 29 % , from US $ 4.7 to 6.1 trillion dollars ( VI Summit ) .

TwoFailing

Though BRICS is striking the whole universe with its recent good public presentation, some negative factors of them can non be neglected. This is, to a big extent, attributed to their national conditions. The prima factor could be the per capita GDP which is dragging them even under a good overall context. “Based on the 2013 GDP per capita released by World Bank, the rank of BRICS states still manner slowdown behind western states with Russia 44^Thursday, Brazil 74^Thursday, South Korea 80^Thursday, China 92^Thursday, India 127^Thursdayout of 180 states and parts, ” Wu Guoping and Wang Fei ( 2013 ) emphasis. This fact non merely proves the spread as ever between BRICS and other states and parts, but besides shows the development at uneven infinite within the group. The worse state of affairs is that since 2011, BRICS ( apart from China ) GDP growing rate centrists ( see Chart 3 ) .

Chart 3 GDP of BRICS Countries From 2007 to 2013

Beginning: BRICS Joint Statistical Publication 2014

Then, how to equilibrate the inter-conflicts and fiscal cooperation will be the long disucssed subject for them. The large disparity in geographics, faith, political system and the similar are impeding the intra-cooperation ( Sang et al. , 2012 ) . These factors even evolve into fire of struggles and clashs. For illustration, low labour cost makes Chinese trade goods enjoy comparative advantage in Brazil`s market, but consequences in 54 anti-dumping instances from 1989 to 2011 ( Wu Guoping and Wang Fei, 2013 ) ; India and China have legion differences and there are escalated boundary line tenseness between them since fifty old ages ago ; China and Russia initiate dialogue on the pricing of oil and gas, but the procedure is repeated and hard. Gratuitous to state, the inter-conflicts will disrupt gait of fiscal cooperation.

Recently, all members face similar development constriction in economic system, like low position in the planetary industrial concatenation, unsound export trade good construction, and high dependance on foreign demand. Furthermore, apart from South Africa, the remainder four are in the face of unsound fiscal system with indirect funding as the chief channel while direct funding strongly limited. The developing capital market in BRICS states comparing with developed states says a batch. In add-on, BRICS suffers homemade jobs. In Brazil, overbearing revenue enhancements, ruddy tape and hapless substructure have hampered fight. Russia`s economic system is extremely dependent on oil and natural with 75 % export are oil and gas, which make itself deficiency of diverseness and therefore less flexible ( Samantha Azzarello and Blu Putnam, 2012 ) . India has long been in the problems of societal inequality, healthful job, faith struggle. China’s new leaders are confronting a long, hard procedure of reshaping the country’s tapped-out growing theoretical account and postulating with lifting debt degrees that threaten the nation’s fiscal stableness. South Africa is plagued with high degrees of continued unemployment, turning dualism in labour market, low degrees of entrepreneurialism among black population ( Handy et al. , 2013 ) .

ThreeOpportunity

Many facts show that BRICS is winning increasing support, as it delivers spill-over consequence to others and enterprises to incorporate entreaties and strength of developing states and parts. Harmonizing to IMF ( 2011 ) , the outgrowth of BRICS has boosted exports of low-income states ( interim are developing states ) , improved footings of trade and productive capacity ; its development funding help many low-income states alleviate substructure constriction and cut down poorness. Additionally, BRICS helps emerging states to hold greater voices and representation in international organisations. In the first joint statement, BRICS states demonstrated their will to play an bigger function in international organisations, peculiarly IMF and World Bank. Accordingly, on May 5^Thursday, 2010, IMF group board passed “quota reform” which would increase the clout of emerging states to 6 % ( Dhar, 2014 ) . The increased quota of BRICS can be seen in Table 1.

Table 1 BRICS Qouta Share and Voting Right in IMF

Beginning: IMF, IMF Membersi?‡Quotas and Voting Power, and IMF Board of Governors, Last Updated: February, 2015.

IMF and World Bank are losing clout in developing states ( Mark Weisbrot, 2013 ) , because of policies being proved harmful to developing states, such as IMF`s conditionality gnawing economic sovereignty in Asiatic states like Thailand, Indonesia, and South Korea ( Catherine H. Lee, 2003 ) . On top of that, western states are busy managing their ain jobs. US, being the large brother for many old ages, is faced with QE go outing ; European countries` economic recovery remains weak ; Japan is battered by its large fisical shortage, etc. Undoubtedly, these, along with support from emerging universe, give BRICS favourable external state of affairs. BRICS established a development bank with 100 billion eventuality modesty plus, taking to mobilise resources for substructure and sustainable development undertakings in other emerging and developing economic systems, demoing its attempts to advance fiscal cooperation among states and will to supplement the attempts of many-sided and regional fiscal establishments for planetary development, therefore contribute to corporate committednesss for accomplishing the end of strong, sustainable and balanced growing ( Indiatoday, 2014 ) .

FourMenace

Ever since its constitution, BRICS is non free from uncertainties and competitions. As in 2012, “BRICS has no construction yet. It was set up by political will, ” said Alexander Tikhomirov ( Nicholas Kotch, 2012 ) . And its development bank has long been the mark of uncertainty. Al Jazeera ( 2013 ) reported, “Leaders from the so-calledBRICS group of emerging states have failed to establish a much-anticipated new development bank to equal western-dominated establishments like the World Bank.” TheVoice of Americadeclared ( Funeka Yazini April, 2013 ) , “BRICS acme ends without development bank deal.” Firstpost ( 2013 ) claimed that BRICS bank is merely a palace in the air. Without exclusion, all media underline the deficiency of execution. Actually, unfavorable judgment from the West shows their wariness towards BRICS.

Still, misgiving is lingering on this newest construction. So far, there are some other homogeneous constructions in different parts of the universe. On the one manus, African Union, ASEAN, the Caribbean Community, the Arab League are placed high outlook, but achieve little after holding the eyes of others on them for long, and therefore convey letdown. On the other manus, the impact of the BRICS in fiscal cooperation is farther limited through the outgrowth of new plurilateral constructions of informal or formal cooperation between emerging states and sub-groups. Obviously, there is an unseeable competition between BRICS and other homogeneous establishments in the country of fiscal cooperation.

VoltDecision and Deduction

With the aid of SWOT analysis, the conditions BRICS are holding and the challenges BRICS are confronting in fiscal cooperation become clear, as is shown in the matrix diagram below drawn from content discussed above. Consequently, schemes can be made and implemented in line with this diagram. For better intra-cooperation within group and international cooperation with G20, BRICS can put about bosltering fiscal cooperation chiefly from pecuniary system, fiscal market, and planetary battle. For each member domestically, cardinal Bankss should farther spread out currency barter [ 2 ] bilaterally or multilaterally for cut downing funding cost and fade outing instability in foreign exchange ; authoritiess need to attach more precedence to fiscal market restructuring, seeking to countervail their unsound fiscal footing. For cooperation with G20, this group should go on to follow duty and regulations proposed by G20, and do its aims conform to G20 model to accomplish win-win consequence. After all, BRICS is a fledgling, so there are more to see, like internal involvement division, more elaborate operating mechanism, memoranda of understanding. The hereafter will demo, whether this new construction will be able to truly play the function, which their instigators want them to play.

Table 2 SWOT Matrix Diagram of BRICS

Mention

Al Jazeera. “BRICS states fail to establish new bank.” 2013. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2013/03/2013327145258420830.html.

Azzarello, Samantha and Blu Putnam. “Slowing Growth in the Face Of Internal and External Challenges.”Market Insight.2012

Baichuan, Sang, Liu Yang, and Zheng Wei. “BRICS Fiscal Cooperation: Current Situation, Challenges, and Prospects.” International Trade. Vol. 12, 2012.

Besada, Hany, Evren Tok, Kristen Winter. “South Africa in BRICS.”Africa Insight. Vol. 42 ( 4 ) , March, 2003.

Biswajit Dhar. “Hope of new fiscal establishments at BRICS summit.” Chinadaily. 2014. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2014-07/14/content_17768221.htm.

Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. “BRICS Joint Statistical Publication 2014.” 2014.

Funeka Yazini April. “Criticism of the BRICS Bank Creation Unwarranted.” Chinafrica. 2013. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.chinafrica.cn/english/Opinions/txt/2013-05/22/

content_546512.htm.

Guoping, Wu, Wang Fei. “Opportunities and Challenges for BRICS Financial Cooperation.”Quanqiuliaowang. Vol. 12, 2013.

IMF. “New Growth Drivers for Low-income States: The Role of BRICs.” 2011

Indiatoday. “Victory for Modi, India as BRICS summitclears puting up of a new development bank, ” hypertext transfer protocol: //indiatoday.intoday.in/story/

modi-victory-brics-summit-clears-a-new-development-bank/1/372582.html.

Kotch Nicholas.“ Doubt over Brics bank’s economic feasibility.” BusinessDay. 2012. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.bdlive.co.za/business/financial/2012/09/26/doubt-over-brics-banks-ec onomic-feasibility.

Larionova, Marina and Mark Rakhmangulov. “BRICS in the System of Global Governance.” 2012.

Lee Catherine H. “IMF in the Asiatic Financial Crisis.” Vol. 24:4. 2003.

Robert Kappel. “The Challenge to Europe: Regional Powers and the Shifting of the Global Order.”Intereconomics( S0020-5346 ) , 2011, ( 46 ) : 275-286i?Z

The BRICS National Statistical Offices. “BRICS Joint Statistical Publication 2014.”BRICS. 2014.

Venky Vembu. “ BRICS Bank is merely a palace in the air.”Firstpost. 2013. hypertext transfer protocol: //m.firstbiz.firstpost.com/economy/brics-bank-is-just-a-castle-in-the-air-3807 4.html? most-popular.

Vivek Bhargavai??Akash Daniai??Di?ZKi?ZMalhotra. Covered Interest Rate Parity Among BRIC Nations [ J ] . Journal of Business & A ; Economic Studies ( S0144i??3585 ) , 2011, ( 17 ) : 37-47i?Z

VI BRICS Summit. “Economic Data and Trade Statistic.” hypertext transfer protocol: //brics6.itamaraty.gov.br/about-brics/economic-data.

Weisbrot Mark. “IMF and World Bank are Losing Clout in Developing Countries.” the Guardian. 2013.

Yao Tseng, Chuni?Z“Technological Innovation in the BRIC Economies.”ResearchTechnology Management( S0895i??6308 ) , 2009, ( 52 ) : 29-35i?Z