1. If raising the tax rate on cigarettes both raise more revenue and reduces smoking, is there any conflict between the health and revenue objectives of the government?
If raising the tax rate on cigarettes both raise more revenue and reduces smoking, there will be no conflict between the health and revenue objectives of the government because the result comply with the health and revenue objectives of the government. The health objective of any government is always to reduce the amount of smoking-related diseases whilst the revenue objective is to gain more revenue and both of this can be achieved by raising the tax rate on cigarettes.
2. You are a government minister. What arguments might you put forward in favour of maximizing the revenue from cigarette taxation? By increasing the tax on cigarettes, it will reduce the amount of people smoking and hence making the government spend less on smoking-related diseases. This will lead to less secondhand smoke exposure among nonsmokers, especially children and pregnant women. It is clear that price has a pronounced effect on the smoking prevalence of teenagers and that the goals of reducing teenage smoking and balancing the budget would both be served by increasing the tax on cigarettes. A cigarette tax increase will reduce smoking among pregnant women, preventing thousands of spontaneous abortions and still-born births, and saving tens of thousands of newborns from suffering from smoking-affected births and related health consequences.
3. You are a doctor. Why might you suggest that smoking should be severely restricted? What methods would you advocate? Smoking should be severely restricted because one of most harmful impacts of smoking is to damage the health of both smokers and non-smokers. Smokers are taking large amount of toxic into their body daily. So those people persist in smoking must sooner or later be affected by smoking-related illness. Smoking is costing a large sum to smoke, and further, to cure smoking-related illness. Smoking seems to be a habit, even an addiction of many people, so they spend a lot of money to satisfy their habit. The result is that the more they smoke, the more serious diseases they suffer from.
They might have a large about of money to cure the disease but death is inevitable.. Therefore, cigarette smoking needs to prohibit strictly. Smoking puts a financial burden on society. This burden continues to rise, with approximately $193 billion spent annually in the United States—$97 billion from lost productivity and $96 billion due to smoking-related health care costs, respectively.
It was reported in 2006 that secondhand smoke costs the U.S. around $10 billion a year: about $5 billion in medical costs associated with secondhand smoke and $4.6 billion in lost wages. I If I were a doctor, I would give my patients nicotine replacement products such as patches, gum, lozenges and inhalers. They work by replacing some of the nicotine that is usually found in cigarettes. Because nicotine products do not have all the other dangerous chemicals in tobacco smoke, they are much safer than smoking.