Describe the functions of evaluation in knowing and development
The function of evaluation in learning and advancement is primarily to provide a measure of the trainees development. Assessment is performed through formative (checks throughout the course), passive (to check against previous marks), and/ or summative (at end of course) activities to assist the learner see their development whilst permitting the Assessor to give valuable feedback when suitable. Its function is to measure the learners understanding of the topic against the anticipated outcomes set by the requirements.
For instance, assessment offers clear measurement and recording of achievement during a course that supplies identification of private accomplishment or learners’ requirements. This records proof of students comprehending of a job prior to the assessment deadline to allow intervention to offer additional assistance. The learner’s development is normally determined utilizing formative or summative evaluation that meets requirements in a fit-for-purpose Project and subsequently shows the needed standards and performance/ evaluation requirements in any offered course.
The purpose is to keep track of advancement via evidence that can be measured and used as performance evaluation/ targets/ benchmarking throughout a course. From an Assessors point of view it is necessary to make sure that assessment choices are regularly examined and internally/ externally validated where possible so regarding contribute to the awarding institutions quality control and on-going advancement of best practice.
Define the crucial ideas and principles of evaluation
The essential concepts and principles of assessments include:
- Fairness– Assessment should be objective and connected to criteria specified by analyzing body. Internal and External checks in samples of marking are required at regular phases to make sure the validity of the evaluation decisions made.
- Reliability – The assessment decisions must be by an assessor with competence in the discipline the work relates to so as to ensure a judgement that is informed by a professional perspective.
- Validity – Decisions must be justified with clear referencing of assessment criteria stated by the examining body. Another Lecturer should be able to award the same grade for the piece of work as the same standardisation method is the barometer NOT the opinion of the assessor.
- Safety – Assessment methods must be suitable for the candidates needs. For example, a learner must have an option for an alternative whereby a mental or physical threat to their well-being could be presented by the assessment.
Students prone to stress/ anxiety attacks during group presentations can be given Vlog, Podcast, or 1-1 alternatives. Risk assessments of locations my media students film in serve both to extend the learners understanding of health and safety whilst helping them help me make our learning space everyone’s responsibility. Negotiation with learners to differentiated methods is a useful way to help the learner feel safer in their assessment by managing suitable alternatives to the candidate needs. The key being to identify specific assessment requirements and acting accordingly whilst maintaining that the learners well being is the most important factor. Purpose The aim, reason, and purpose of assessment are to help the learner track their progress, provide feedback, and inspire them to achieve.
The trainer gains evidence of learning from assessment which can in turn be measured clearly against a set criteria. This continuous assessment learning/ training cycle is designed to recognise prior learning and improve it with each assessment. The assessor grades the work so the trainer (if someone different from the assessor) can see the distance traveled on the course when compared to grades throughout the programme. The organisation can use this quantitative data to track a class, department, and/ or, entire organisations performance in relation to peer organizations so employers can often assess their own staff’s performance. Bandler and Grinder’s Psychomotor/ Cognitive/ Affective assessment of specific learning domains – skills, knowledge, or understanding. Bandler and Grinder’s key concept/ principles can be defined in to three categories: Psychomotor/ Cognitive/ Affective assessment of specific learning domains.
The cognitive domain relates to the more traditionalist assumptions of academic/ intellectual learning. In this domain Bandler and Grinder counted ‘knowledge, comprehension/ understanding’ as well as ‘application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation’. Cognitive assessment should focus on the application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation rather than towards only the acquisition of knowledge and understanding. To this end any theory in my lectures is made applicable in a video/ practical task that puts in to practice the idea/ terminology/ argument we have discussed – which in turn serves to consolidate and validate the learning. This domain relates to objectives concerned with knowledge and intellectual skills and there are six categories which I can apply in my lectures.
- Knowledge: Asking learners to recall specific and general items of information (e.g. media terminology) and also information about methods (‘how do you add this effect?’) processes and patterns (using software such as Photoshop).
- Comprehension: Encouraging recognition of items of information settings similar to but different from those in which they were first encountered e.g. relating theories and debates to contemporary issues such as Laura Mulvey’s Feminist theory of female objectification in mainstream cinema.
Cite this essay
Principles and Practices of Assessment in Teaching. (2016, Apr 15). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/principles-and-practices-of-assessment-in-teaching-essay