We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Check Writers' Offers

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and Get Writers' Offers

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

Oregon Oxford Debate

Paper type: Essay
Pages: 5 (1217 words)
Categories: Ox
Downloads: 48
Views: 560

OREGON OXFORD DEBATE

  1. Rules and Guidelines On Debate Prepared
  2. Proposition:Resolved: “That Parliamentary Form of Government Be Adopted”
  3. Format of Debate: Oxford-Oregon Type
  4. Three Speakers fromeach side
    1. First Affirmative — Constructive Speech
    2. First Negative — Interpellation of the first affirmative Speaker
    3. First Negative — Constructive Speech
    4. First Affirmative — Interpellation of the first negative speaker
    5. Second Affirmative — Constructive Speech
    6. Second Negative — Interpellation of the second affirmative
    7. Second Negative — Constructive
    8. Second Affirmative — Interpellation of the second negative
    9. Third Affirmative — Constructive Speech
    10. Third Negative — Interpellation of the third affirmative
    11. Third Negative — Constructive Speech
    12. Third Affirmative — Interpellation of the third negative
  5. Three Speakers fromeach sideRebuttal of the Team Captainof the Affirmative SideSUR- Rebuttal of the Team Captainof the Negative Side
  6. Duration Constructive Speech: Minimum of five (5) and maximum of seven (7) minutesInterpellation: Five (5) minutesRebuttal Speech: Three (3) minutesSUR- Rebuttal: Three (3) minutes
  7. Issues for Debate A.

    Whether or not it is Necessary? (Necessity) B. Whether or not it is beneficial? (Beneficial) C. Whether or not it is practical?(Practicability)

  8. Criteria for JudgingA. Evidence — 25%B. Delivery — 30%C. Interpellation — 30%D. Rebuttal &SUR-Rebuttal — 15%
  9. Criteria for Judging- The judges, based on theirdiscretion, shall have the authority todetermine who will be the BestSpeaker and Best Debater. Thewinning team shall be determined bythe majority decision of the Board of Judges.
  10. Guides for Constructive Speech — Speech types of Constructive Speech maybe: Reading Method Memory Method Extemporaneous Mix method of memory and conversational or dramatic
  11. Guides for Constructive Speech — Poise, gestures, audience contact andvoice projection are highly recommended.

Rules on Interpellation

  • 1. Questions should primarily focused on argumentsdeveloped in the speech of your opponent. However,matters relevant and material to the proposition areadmissible.
  • 2. Questioner and opponent should treat each other withcourtesy.
  • 3. Both speakers stand and face the audience during thequestion or Interpellation period.
  • 4. Once the questioning has begun, neither the questionernor his opponent may consult a colleague. Consultationshould be done before but as quietly as possible.
  • 5. Questioners should ask brief and easily understandablequestion. Answers should equally be brief. Categorical questionsanswerable by yes or no is allowed, however, opponent if hechoose, may qualify his answer why yes or why no.
  • 6. Questioner may not cut off a reasonable and qualifyinganswer, but he may cut off a nervous response with a statementsuch as a “thank you” “that is enough information” or “yourpoint is quite clear” or “I’m satisfied.”
  • 7. Questioner should not comment on the response of hisopponent.
  • 8. Your opponent may refuse to answer ambiguous, irrelevant orloaded questions by asking the questioner to rephrase or reformhis question.

Rules on Rebuttal Speech

  • A. Rebuttal speaker should point out clearlythe fallacies committed by his opponentstating clearly what particularly statement orargument constitute said fallacy.
  • B. If not familiar with the fallacies of logic,the debater may counter arguments directlyby stating what arguments or statement isincorrect or false.

Role of the Moderator

The moderator of the debate has the followingduties:

  • 1. To reveal the issue involve the debate;
  • 2. To rule on points of clarification about theissues or questions and answers made during theInterpellation; and
  • 3. To see to it that the debate is orderly andfollows the rules of parliamentary procedures.

Role of the Timer

  • 1. To time the speakers and debatersaccurately;
  • 2. To give the speakers a one-minutewarning with the ringing of the bell oncebefore his/her time is up.
  • 3. To prevent the debaters from exceedingthe time allotted to them by ringing thebell twice.

CROSS EXAMINATION

  • A. The cross-examination period of a debate is a time when the person who is not going to speak next in the constructive questions the person who has just finished speaking.
  • B. Consider cross examination an information exchange period — it is not the time to role play lawyer.
  • C. Cross examination may serve six objectives: 1. To clarify points 2. To expose errors 3. To obtain admissions 4. To setup arguments 5. To save prep time 6. To show the judge how cool you are so they WANT to vote
  • D. Most debaters tend to ignore the value of good cross- examination. Remember, 30% of the entire debate is spent in cross-examination — it should be a meaningful and essential part of the debate. If nothing else, debaters tend to underestimate the importance that cross-examination may have on the judge.
  • E. Cross-examination will indicate to the judge just how sharp and spontaneous the debaters are. Invisible bias will always occur in a debate round and judges would always like the sharpest team to win. Good, effective cross- examination of the opponents can play an important psychological role in winning the ballot of the judge.
  • F. Be dynamic. Have questions and be ready to go, answer questions actively and with confidence whenever you can. The image you project will be very important to the audience/judge. This is the one opportunity the audience/judge has to compare you with opponent’s side-by-side.

GUIDELINES FOR ASKINGQUESTIONS

  • 1. Ask a short Q designed to get a short A
  • 2. Indicate the object of your Q
  • 3. Dont telegraph your argument, dontmake it too obvious.
  • 4. Dont ask Q they wont answerproperly.“So, we win, right?”
  • 5. Make Q seem important, even if it isjust an attempt to clarify.
  • 6. Politeness is a must — emphasize thedifference if they are rude.
  • 7. Approach things from a non-obviousdirection. Then trap them.
  • 8. Mark your flow/notes as to what youwant to question them about.
  • 9. Avoid open ended Qs unless you aresure they are clueless.
  • 10. Face the judge/audience, not youropponent.
  • 11. CX answers must be integrated intoyour arguments made during a speech.
  • 1. Concise A.
  • 2. Refer to something you have alreadysaid whenever possible. This is safe.
  • 3. Answer based on your position in thedebate so far. Keep options open.
  • 4. Dont make promises of what you oryour partner will do later.
  • 5. Qualify your answers.
  • 6. Be willing to exchange documentsread into the debate.
  • 7. Answer only relevant questions.
  • 8. Address the judge.
  • 9. Try and not answer hypothetical Q. Ifthey demand, say you will give ahypothetical A.
  • 10. Signal each other, dont tag-team.
  • 11. Dont say”I dont know,”say”I am notsure at this time….”

REBUTTALS

  • A. Most debaters, coaches, and judges would agree that rebuttals are the most difficult and yet the most important parts of the debate.
  • B. Not only is there less time within each speech, but each debater has to sort through all of the issues to determine which ones are the most important ones!
  • C. What a debater does or does not do in rebuttals will decide who wins the debate. Very few debaters (especially beginners) can hope to extend everything that happened in the constructive speeches.
  • D. Debaters dont have to do that and just because a team may have dropped a point or an argument is not an automatic reason to vote against that team.
  • E. What matters is the type of argument that is extended or dropped in rebuttals-this will determine the winner of the round.

Think about these four issues when rebuttals happen:

  • 1. Which arguments have more weight at theend of the round?
  • 2. Which outcomes (disads, counter plans)are more likely given lots of internal links?
  • 3. What about time frame-what happensfirst?
  • 4. What about the quality of evidence?

Here are some other helpful hints:

  • 1. Avoid repetition. Dont just repeat yourconstructive arguments. Beat the other teamsarguments and tell the judge why your argumentsare better.
  • 2. Avoid passing ships. Dont avoid what theother team said. You must clash directly withtheir responses.
  • 3. Avoid reading evidence only. You must beexplaining and telling the judge why these issueswin the debate.
  • 4. Avoid rereading evidence that has alreadybeen read in constructive. You can makereference to it by referring to it, but dont re-read it.
  • 5. Avoid “lumping and dumping.”Dont try togo for everything. You cant make 12responses to each argument in a few minutes.
  • 6. Be organized. Dont jump from issue toissue at random. Be specific and logical aboutwinning issues.
  • 7. Dont be a blabbering motor mouth. Speakquickly but not beyond your ability. If you speaktoo fast, you will stumble and not get through asmuch.
  • 8. Dont whine to the judge about fairness or whatthe other team might have done that you think isunethical. Make responses and beat them.
  • 9. Dont make new arguments. You can read newevidence but you cant run new disadvantages ortopicality responses. You are limiting to extendingthe positions laid out in the constructive speeches.
  • 10. Use signposting. Make sure the judge knowswhere you are on the flow sheet. This is not the timeto lose the judge on the flow.
  • 11. Use issue packages. Organize your argumentsinto issue packages. Choose arguments which youwant to win. Dont go for everything. Extend thosearguments that you need to win.
  • 12. Cross-apply arguments. If you dropped anargument in a prior speech that you think wasimportant dont act like your losing. Cross-applyarguments you made somewhere else in the debate toanswer it.

Cite this essay

Oregon Oxford Debate. (2016, Mar 28). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/oregon-oxford-debate-essay

How to Avoid Plagiarism
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Get help from professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Not Finding What You Need?

Search for essay samples now

image

Your Answer is very helpful for Us
Thank you a lot!