We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Check Writers' Offers

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and Get Writers' Offers

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

Muhammad and Malvo Crime Review

Paper type: Review
Pages: 2 (303 words)
Categories: Crime, Gun Control, Gun Control In America, Gun Control Laws, Gun Violence, Gun Violence In America
Downloads: 3
Views: 7

Manufacturers and Responsibility

During 2002, John Allen Muhammad and John Lee Malvo shot and killed up to 13 people in Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Maryland, Virginia and Washington, D. C. They used a semiautomatic assault rifle manufactured by Bushmaster Firearms, Inc. The two killers bought the rifle from Bull’s Eye Shooter Supply, a gunshop in Tacoma, Washington, although federal law prohibited the shop from selling the gun to either Muhammad, who had a record of domestic battery, or Malvo, who was a minor.

Survivors of the victims have claimed that although Muhammad and Malvo were directly responsible for the deaths of the victims, both Bushmaster Firearms, Inc. , and Bull’s Eye Shooter Supply (and their owners) also “should be held responsible. “ Audits by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms showed that Bull’s Eye had “lost“ guns (238 in a 3-year period) or “lost“ documentation – including its records of the Muhammad-Malvo sale – yet Bushmaster Firearms continued to sell its guns to the shop.

Survivors of the victims claimed that Bushmaster Firearms had an obligation not to create an unreasonable risk of foreseeable harm from the distribution of its guns. The company, they claimed, failed to adequately investigate or screen this dealer’s record of weapons handling, failed to adequately monitor and supervise how its dealer was selling its guns, and failed to provide training or incentives for its dealer to comply with gun laws.

If Bull’s Eye and Bushmaster had acted as they had an obligation to act, Muhammad and Malvo would have been prevented from obtaining the assault rifle they needed to kill their victims since federal laws prohibited both from buying guns. Bull’s Eye and Bushmaster helped cause the deaths, the wife of a victim claimed, and so “they share the responsibility for my husband’s death and many others. “

Cite this essay

Muhammad and Malvo Crime Review. (2018, Aug 29). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/muhammad-and-malvo-crime-review-essay

How to Avoid Plagiarism
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Get help from professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Not Finding What You Need?

Search for essay samples now

image

Your Answer is very helpful for Us
Thank you a lot!