24/7 writing help on your phone
Save to my list
Remove from my list
1. According to Chafets, how widespread is a substance abuse among professional baseball gamers?
In the text, Chafets blogs about how and when the usage of this types of drugs were discovered in baseball gamers. Professional athletes would discover whatever that increases their performance and recovery duration. Athletes live under the pressure to win the match, to be the very best, to be widely known so prevalent have become a substance abuse in a manner that professional athletes find practical and hassle-free at the time of completing because it gives them an extra boost in the video game.
This kind of substance abuse is still questioned by professional athletes to be consider moral.
2. What is Chafets’s action to the charge that “steroids are the game”?
Chafets reaction is that despite the fact that steroids and anabolic are utilized by baseball players, the video game have actually altered throughout the years. But these factors does not alter the video game in basic and steroids does alter the game.
Lots of athletes repeat to drugs to increase their opportunities to win and it exists more athletes that utilize this drugs than then society can ever picture, so data alter due to the fact that the game is no longer “real” or truthful. Regardless baseball is liked by US citizens.
3. What does Chafets imply when he says that both baseball and the Hall of Fame require to “replace mythology and spin with realism and honesty”?
The author is exposing a sense of paradox and sarcasm when he mentions “replace folklore and spin with realism and honesty”.
He is discussing that the drug abuse offered more strength and endurance to the professional athletes so they are as similar to the “gods” of the mythology. In addition, he specifies that this resemblance needs to change into a more practical and honest point of view due to the fact that in reality the athletes did not gain that fame from their own effort and sacrifice, dishonesty was the root of their popularity.
4. What is Chafet’s response to the charge that if it enabled gamers to utilize performance-enhancing drugs, the Baseball Hall of Popularity would set a bad example for children- specifically young professional athletes?
Nowadays, baseball is a sport watched by millions of US citizens; kids form a high percentage of audience in this group. Chafet’s response is that adult athletes are not children! If they prefer consuming anabolic drugs to increase their performance in the game is their problem. In reality, studies have indicated that kids absorb everything that they see so indeed, athletes are a bad example for children. Young athletes are influenced by this type of conduct and their future career can be negatively affected if strict regulations are not stablished.
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.get help with your assignment