Kant's Critique of Utilitarianism Ethics

Essay, Pages 2 (469 words)

Views

439

Immanuel Kant's critique of Utilitarianism stems from his belief that it fails to recognize the intrinsic value of individuals by treating them merely as a means to an end, rather than as ends in themselves. As a deontologist, Kant posits the existence of a universal moral imperative that dictates certain actions as inherently right or wrong, regardless of individual desires, needs, or utility. Central to his ethical framework is the concept of the Categorical Imperative, which is a product of reason and is considered a priori knowledge, meaning it is not derived from experience.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get your custom essay on

“ Kant’s Critique of Utilitarianism Ethics ”

Get custom paper

NEW! smart matching with writer

The Categorical Imperative serves as the foundational principle of the moral law, applying to all rational and reasonable beings. It is characterized by its unconditional nature, binding individuals to act in accordance with moral duties. However, due to our sensuous nature, we may perceive the moral law as a constraint, leading us to face moral dilemmas where our rational judgment conflicts with our inclinations.

Kant believed that by subjecting moral maxims to the CI procedure, individuals could determine the morality or immorality of their actions.

This procedure consists of four steps: formulating a subjective maxim, generalizing it, universalizing it, and assessing its implications. For instance, if one were to consider cheating on a test due to lack of time to study, they would need to universalize this action and evaluate its consequences on a broader scale.

Through the CI procedure, individuals are prompted to consider whether they can conceive of a world where everyone acts in accordance with the maxim and whether they sincerely will such a world.

If the maxim passes these tests and aligns with the moral law, it is deemed morally permissible. In the case of cheating on a test, Kant argues that such an action would undermine the value of hard work and effort put into studying, thus making it morally impermissible.

According to Kant, acting in accordance with the Categorical Imperative not only guides ethical decision-making but also reveals one's freedom and dignity. Dignity, in Kantian terms, is linked to morality and is what allows individuals to be part of the "Kingdom of ends," a community of autonomous beings who adhere to moral principles. By recognizing the moral law, individuals are able to distinguish between right and wrong, thereby achieving autonomy and freedom from external influences.

In conclusion, Kant's critique of Utilitarianism highlights the importance of recognizing the inherent value of individuals and acting in accordance with universal moral principles. Through the Categorical Imperative, individuals can navigate moral dilemmas and make ethical decisions that uphold the dignity and autonomy of rational beings.