Influence of Animation Film Animal Farm

The revolution was to escape from humans and their savage ways, yet would the animals be able to get away from the tyrannical rule of their own comrade? From the stimulating tune, ‘Beasts of England’ to the original laws that were changed by Napoleon, the primary source of power all through the novel is an outcome from language and the rhetoric.

Top Writers
Academic Giant
Verified expert
5 (345)
Expert Writers
Verified expert
4 (256)
Allan Brooks
Verified expert
5 (893)
hire verified writer

Without language and rhetoric in Animal Farm, the defiance never would have occurred and unquestionably the final product of Napoleon’s overthrow could never have ensued.

Through the noteworthy expository and promulgation aptitudes of Squealer and the apt control of significance by different characters, the truth is formed by words, whether it be for better or in negative ways. By showing how effectively influenced the animals are by an amazing discourse, Orwell is exhibiting something through the tale about the human weakness to witty words and the capacity of individuals to succumb to the power of words without understanding the more profound implications behind them.

This is thoughtfully portrayed in the 1994 animation of Animal Farm. Where the character Squealer is better depicted as his original persuasive and totalitarian personality. In opposition, the 1999 live-action version of Animal Farm does not concentrate on the animals, let alone Squealer, for it focuses more on the human character, Mr. Jones, and his characterization.

The revolution was to escape from humans and their savage ways, yet would the animals be able to get away from the tyrannical rule of their own comrade? From the stimulating tune, ‘Beasts of England’ to the original laws that were changed by Napoleon, the primary source of power all through the novel is an outcome from language and the rhetoric. Without language and rhetoric in Animal Farm, the defiance never would have occurred and unquestionably the final product of Napoleon’s overthrow could never have ensued. Through the noteworthy expository and promulgation aptitudes of Squealer and the apt control of significance by different characters, the truth is formed by words, whether it be for better or in negative ways. By showing how effectively influenced the animals are by an amazing discourse, Orwell is exhibiting something through the tale about the human weakness to witty words and the capacity of individuals to succumb to the power of words without understanding the more profound implications behind them. This is thoughtfully portrayed in the 1994 animation of Animal Farm. Where the character Squealer is better depicted as his original persuasive and totalitarian personality. In opposition, the 1999 live-action version of Animal Farm does not concentrate on the animals, let alone Squealer, for it focuses more on the human character, Mr. Jones, and his characterization.

Squealer use of convincing language and impassioned words allows him to obtain the respect and accordance of the animals, which in turn, lead to his rise in power. The primary source of power throughout the story comes from the language and rhetoric used by Squealer. Squealer is characterized as being persuasive. In the novel, Squealer is said to have been able to “turn black into white”(Orwell). Illustrating, that he had the ability to convince people even from the truth. In the animation film, Squealer had convinced the animals that Snowball had been sided with the humans, and he was against Napoleon since the beginning of the revolution. Therefore, turning the animals against Snowball and making him the scapegoat for the rest of their failures, such as the windmill (Rochemont). Secondly, Squealer’s change of the original commandments, and his persuasion that the commandments had “always said that”, despite the opposition from other literate animals also garnered the acceptance from the animals(Orwell). In the animation film, once the animals that had been secretly supporting Snowball, during the rise of Napoleon, came to fruition, they were killed and the commandment that had once read that no animals shall kill other animals, quickly changed to no animal shall kill other animals without reason. Squealer had maintained order throughout the killing even though the original commandment was one of the bases for the revolution. (Rochemont). Lastly, Squealer’s strong conviction that Boxer was not sent to his death, rather he was sent to a hospital(Orwell). During the animation of the novel, not only did Squealer stand by his conviction, but he also cried, therefore manipulating the other animals emotionally to garner emotional support. After he shed tears, he then ended with the chant “ Long Live Napoleon”, which was used to wrap up the remembrance of Boxer(Rochemont).

The live-action version of the fable, Animal Farm wrongfully portrayed the storyline, characters, and it strayed from the focus of the story, almost losing the lesson that the parable told. The storyline of the original novel included only 4 main human characters, which were Mr. Jones, Mr. Pilkington, Mr. Fredrick, and Mr. Whymper(Orwell). But, in the live-action film, Mr. Jones had a wife and so did the other two farm owners, Mr. Frederick and Mr. Pilkington. The film even went as far as creating a family for Mr. Pilkington(Stephenson). This strayed from the storyline because it focused on the human characters too much, even going as far as showing Mr. Jones’s affair with Mrs. Pilkington, which drew away from the idea of the revolution, and characterizing Mr. Jones as unfaithful. In the novel, one of the main ways Napoleon stayed in power was through the use of his dogs, which were, in essence, his “military”(Orwell). Yet, the live-action film failed to portray any sort of military power keeping the animals “ in check”. The only dog that was portrayed in the film was Jessie, originally the mother of the puppies that soon grew to be the vicious animals that faithfully stood by Napoleon’s side(Stephenson). Lastly, the wrongful inclusion of how Old Major died was also a negative and unnecessary impact on the storyline. In the novel, he peacefully died a few days after the meeting, which was where he informed the animals of his dream of the revolution. Thus, giving the animals more time to formulate the plan for the revolution(Orwell). In contrast, the live-action film portrayed Old Major’s death a manslaughter, where he was unknowingly shot by Mr. Jones, then falling to his death after being shot(Stephenson).

In Conclusion, the1994 animation film of Animal Farm better represented the idea that the primary source of the power come from the use of language and rhetoric. The animation film included Squealer changing the original commandment and convincing the animals that the change was always there. It included changing the animal’s perspective of Snowball by convincingly making Snowball the reason for any of their failures, such as the windmill. Finally, the manipulation of emotions of the animals during the time of Boxer’s death showed that language is so powerful, it can turn the truth into a lie. Therefore, the use of language and rhetoric can change an idea that was widely believed, into a false rumor brought upon by an individual’s faulty memory.

. Where the character Squealer is better depicted as his original persuasive and totalitarian personality. In opposition, the 1999 live-action version of Animal Farm does not concentrate on the animals, let alone Squealer, for it focuses more on the human character, Mr. Jones, and his characterization.

Squealer use of convincing language and impassioned words allows him to obtain the respect and accordance of the animals, which in turn, lead to his rise in power. The primary source of power throughout the story comes from the language and rhetoric used by Squealer. Squealer is characterized as being persuasive. In the novel, Squealer is said to have been able to “turn black into white”(Orwell). Illustrating, that he had the ability to convince people even from the truth. In the animation film, Squealer had convinced the animals that Snowball had been sided with the humans, and he was against Napoleon since the beginning of the revolution. Therefore, turning the animals against Snowball and making him the scapegoat for the rest of their failures, such as the windmill (Rochemont). Secondly, Squealer’s change of the original commandments, and his persuasion that the commandments had “always said that”, despite the opposition from other literate animals also garnered the acceptance from the animals(Orwell). In the animation film, once the animals that had been secretly supporting Snowball, during the rise of Napoleon, came to fruition, they were killed and the commandment that had once read that no animals shall kill other animals, quickly changed to no animal shall kill other animals without reason. Squealer had maintained order throughout the killing even though the original commandment was one of the bases for the revolution. (Rochemont). Lastly, Squealer’s strong conviction that Boxer was not sent to his death, rather he was sent to a hospital(Orwell). During the animation of the novel, not only did Squealer stand by his conviction, but he also cried, therefore manipulating the other animals emotionally to garner emotional support. After he shed tears, he then ended with the chant “ Long Live Napoleon”, which was used to wrap up the remembrance of Boxer(Rochemont).

The live-action version of the fable, Animal Farm wrongfully portrayed the storyline, characters, and it strayed from the focus of the story, almost losing the lesson that the parable told. The storyline of the original novel included only 4 main human characters, which were Mr. Jones, Mr. Pilkington, Mr. Fredrick, and Mr. Whymper(Orwell). But, in the live-action film, Mr. Jones had a wife and so did the other two farm owners, Mr. Frederick and Mr. Pilkington. The film even went as far as creating a family for Mr. Pilkington(Stephenson). This strayed from the storyline because it focused on the human characters too much, even going as far as showing Mr. Jones’s affair with Mrs. Pilkington, which drew away from the idea of the revolution, and characterizing Mr. Jones as unfaithful. In the novel, one of the main ways Napoleon stayed in power was through the use of his dogs, which were, in essence, his “military”(Orwell). Yet, the live-action film failed to portray any sort of military power keeping the animals “ in check”. The only dog that was portrayed in the film was Jessie, originally the mother of the puppies that soon grew to be the vicious animals that faithfully stood by Napoleon’s side(Stephenson). Lastly, the wrongful inclusion of how Old Major died was also a negative and unnecessary impact on the storyline. In the novel, he peacefully died a few days after the meeting, which was where he informed the animals of his dream of the revolution. Thus, giving the animals more time to formulate the plan for the revolution(Orwell). In contrast, the live-action film portrayed Old Major’s death a manslaughter, where he was unknowingly shot by Mr. Jones, then falling to his death after being shot(Stephenson).

In Conclusion, the1994 animation film of Animal Farm better represented the idea that the primary source of the power come from the use of language and rhetoric. The animation film included Squealer changing the original commandment and convincing the animals that the change was always there. It included changing the animal’s perspective of Snowball by convincingly making Snowball the reason for any of their failures, such as the windmill. Finally, the manipulation of emotions of the animals during the time of Boxer’s death showed that language is so powerful, it can turn the truth into a lie. Therefore, the use of language and rhetoric can change an idea that was widely believed, into a false rumor brought upon by an individual’s faulty memory.

Cite this page

Influence of Animation Film Animal Farm. (2021, Apr 19). Retrieved from http://studymoose.com/influence-of-animation-film-animal-farm-essay

Are You on a Short Deadline? Let a Professional Expert Help You
HELP ME WITH WRITING
Let’s chat?  We're online 24/7