The UK government can adopt various supply side measures to further increase the productivity in workplace.
First, it is absolutely vital to ensure that the education sector continues to receive large amount of funding from government. In fact, it is currently the third largest recipient of budget after social security and healthcare and should be in such position for many years to come even when the economy is not performing. Billions are spent onto building schools where literacy rate is relatively lower, training teachers, developing new curriculum or courses that suit industrial need and providing loans to undergraduates to increase their enrolment rate. The purpose is to increase the quantity and quality of workforce. Being more educated enables an individual to work independently, more efficient and understand complex instructions. Productivity gap between UK and rival economies like France and Germany will narrow.
Next, the government can further tame the trade unions. Although we have not seen strikes like those during the era of Margaret Thatcher, industrial dispute that takes place from time to time is still a major concern for many employers. Consider the recent strikes by cabin crews in British Airways, immigration officers in ISU (Immigration Service Union), HP workers and many more. When workers refuse to work, there will be lesser output on monthly basis. As such it is justified to have more laws passed in Parliament to secure the interest of firms. For instance, firms must be allowed to take stricter action against workers or union if they cause severe losses or making it more difficult for unions to call for strikes.
Between the two measures discussed, it is argued that public investment onto education is a better policy. This is because UK economy has moved away from industries that require manual skills to those that need mental skills. In other words, UK has moved away from manufacturing sector to services sector like banking and finance and also quaternary like research.
Today, size of service sector is about 76% of her GDP compared to manufacturing sector of 22%. Having said so, critics argue that it has an extremely long effect lags. This is because the building of schools and having a targeted number of skilled graduates are not an overnight effort. It may take as long as a decade before noticing any change in the level of productivity. Also one must consider that UK experiences one of the highest numbers of brain drain. It loses its professional workers to other English speaking countries like US, Australia and New Zealand. In such circumstance, AS may not shift rightward by much
As a matter of fact, there must be some balance in power between the employers and labour unions. Although the weakening of unions creates a more flexible labour market (easy to hire and fire without negotiation with trade union) and lower down the costs of production, some firms might abuse the power given. For instance, workers in certain industries may be underpaid or in some circumstance retrenched without any good reason and justified compensation. In some cases, employers may freeze wages of workers for their own good such as taking home fat bonuses. Furthermore, it is already difficult to organise a strike due to the structure of economy. Workers in services sectors, say a bank are not as clustered and large in numbers like those in factories .