Euthanasia – The Right to Decide Essay

Custom Student Mr. Teacher ENG 1001-04 4 January 2017

Euthanasia – The Right to Decide

The definition of euthanasia from the Oxford Dictionary is: “The painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or is in an incurable coma. ” Consider the words “suffering,” “painful,” “irreversible” and “incurable. ” These words describe a patients terrible conditions and prospects. Euthanasia is known as “mercy killing” for a reason, it is the most, humane, moral and logical form of treatment available to patients that have no hope in fully recovering.

If you had to choose between lying in bed dying a slow and painful death, or dying a quick painless death at the time you choose so that you can be surrounded by all your loved ones, which would you choose? With euthanasia, patients have this latter choice, offering them the ability to end their pain and suffering. Living life in a hospital bed forever in pain is hardly a life anyone would want to live, and forcing this life upon someone is an immoral and terrible thing to do. People choosing euthanasia elect to die, knowing that their life will never be the same nor will it be pleasant for them and those who are close to them.

To be alive is to totally and openly participate in the simplicity and elegance of here and now,” stated Donald Altman. Not being able to engage fully in life without suffering makes death a better option. Friends and family also suffer through the hardships of seeing someone they love dying and in pain, knowing they can do nothing to help. With these reasons in mind, euthanasia is one of the most moral treatments in our world today. It provides relief for everyone suffering from an incurable and painful disease.

Mercy killing is not an unheard of idea, we see it everyday in veterinary clinics where animals are put down by their owners consent. In essence, this act is seen as a humane way to relieve your pets suffering. So why are humans not shown the same compassion? A good example of this sort of situation was the killing of an ailing calf in Sabarmati Ashram (Mohandas Gandhi’s home) where the calf was dying and the surgeons looking after it deemed the animal beyond the point of help and hope. Gandhi stated, “In the circumstances, I felt that humanity demanded that the agony should be ended y ending life itself. ”

This is perfect reasoning to why euthanasia should be legal and always a considered treatment. Gandhi also said, “Would I apply to human beings the principle that I have enunciated in connection with the calf? Would I like it to be applied in my own case? My reply is yes. ” When put in a position of irreversible suffering, death from euthanasia is not only the best form of relief but also the most humane, even Mohandas Gandhi saw mercy killing in a humane light. No creature should be forced to live life, in pain and suffering with no hope of relief.

Moral and humane are both two aspects of why euthanasia should not only be legal but a well-known option in hospitals today. Euthanasia addresses both these attributes. It is also the most logical option since it is cost effective as well. Money being spent on housing, supporting and treating terminally ill patients puts a huge financial burden on the family and friends. In summary, we should not only be using euthanasia to help terminally ill patients and their family, but to allocate financial resources for better use.

For example, finding cures for fatal diseases and to support potential patients who are expected to recover from their illness. People argue that euthanasia is wrong, based on the beliefs that it is not morally nor logically acceptable. In addition, individuals consider life to be a gift that should never be taken away from anyone but God. Be that as it may, take into consideration that when someone is euthanized nothing is being taken away from them against their will, it is physician-assisted suicide not physician-assisted murder.

It is by the patients free will that they can choose to end their suffering, and isn’t free will a fundamental right? Shouldn’t we have the entitlement to choose how we live, and by default how we die? Being able to make this choice is what defines us. Euthanasia is simply the liberty to choose, to not be forced into a situation that causes you pain and suffering. In the famous words of Bob Marley, “Love the life you live. Live the life you love. ” In essence, without the free will to make these kinds of choices regarding the value of our life, how can we be expected to love life and truly treat it as a gift.

Euthanasia is known as mercy killing [or assisted suicide] in order to painlessly terminate one’s life with the humane motive of ending his or her suffering,” states Dr. M. Maisie. Even though it can be argued that euthanasia is no different from a homicide, euthanasia is no the chance to alleviate agony of terminally ill patient. It is unfair and inhuman to force suffering upon any living thing, and we see animals being shown the compassion that many patients wish they had.

Euthanasia saves money that could be used to cure patients. Furthermore, death is inevitable for everyone; it is one of the few things promised in life. But isn’t suffering from an incurable disease, knowing you will die, more painful than death itself? In conclusion, mercy killing is a humane, moral and logical option that everyone should have the choice to elect. Above all, it is a right to be able to choose how you die, so say yes to euthanasia, say yes to having a choice.

Free Euthanasia – The Right to Decide Essay Sample


  • Subject:

  • University/College: University of Arkansas System

  • Type of paper: Thesis/Dissertation Chapter

  • Date: 4 January 2017

  • Words:

  • Pages:

Let us write you a custom essay sample on Euthanasia – The Right to Decide

for only $16.38 $13.9/page

your testimonials