Have you ever thought of how globalization hasn’t just moved nations nearer together, but also how it has generated a single moral perception for nations conducting business together? Management teams are discovering that there are great moral challenges waiting to be found out by the enhanced progress to a global scale. If ethics are an issue inside a country, visualize the difficulties that crop up when the quantity of people involved grows up to an international scale, cultures are different, as well as the language is alien.
In this report we are going to thrash out two articles which deal with the moral perceptions of China and India, how these articles add to understanding international ethics, and how China’s and India’s business ethics contrast to that of the United States. Santa Clara University printed an article penned by Stephen Rothlin called “Business Ethics in the Chinese Context” that thrashed out some of the growth China achieved in 2006 and 2007 in business ethics. Stephen Rothlin works as the general secretary of the Center for International Business Ethics in Beijing.
January 2008, Rothlin modernized the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics business and Organizational Ethics Partnership with the growth he had seen since his last trip in 2006. Rothlin thrashed out six types including; conditions for oral companies, community role, ecological sustainability, anti-corruption action, and customer privileges. In each of the six types he discussed both developments seen as well as suggested fields which required concentration for progress (Business Ethics in the Chinese Context, 2008).
China’s work standards and employee privileges have progressed through the improvement of their Labor Contract Law which now defends China’s longtime workers from being dismissed from a job without particular reason. It also needs organizations to make a payment to employee social security accounts and has enhanced the workers’ protection by improving rules of working conditions. The new law also defends kids through child labor laws and now they are trying to make sure that China pursues these new rules and regulations (Business Ethics n the Chinese Context, 2008).
In 2007, China dealt with a key setback with the surge of product recalls. Rothlin discussed how China must improve their advertising, product security, and China’s measures taken on such issues as being a most important moral problem for China. Rothlin also talked about anti-corruption measures of China as well as how dismissing Mayor Chen Liangyu sent a shockwave throughout China as part of the onslaught on corruption there. Rothlin said that “We have to depend on the dedication of top officers to fight corruption,” and that “they [top officers] lose reliability by doing nothing. A significant difficulty with corruption in China is paying-off through gift giving.
Rothlin thinks that declining a gift would be against cultural standard in China, but that officials require concentrating on how a rule of conduct can set particular restrictions to giving gifts (Business Ethics in the Chinese Context, 2008). Rothlin also talked about ecological sustainability as well as how with the 2008 Olympics in Beijing, China has persuaded executives to solve the present water and air pollution issue, preserve energy, and clear out the public transportation system.
The society has been encouraged to assist through the new tax scheme which was introduced. With that, social obligation has turned out to be a growing interest, particularly with education. The final item that he talked about is how his business is upgrading new standards for moral businesses that will be utilized to assist identify the most moral businesses in China (Business Ethics in the Chinese Context, 2008).