Analysis of Black Lives Matter Global Network

The Black Lives Matter Global Network is a chapter-based, member-led organization with the mission of building local power and intervening in the state- and vigilantes-inflicted violence against Black communities. Other things like racial profiling, police brutality, and racial inequity in the United States have protested regularly against the killing of Black persons by the police and by the broader public. It was formed on July 13, 2013, by Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometi with the use of the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter on social media after the acquittal of George Zimmerman in the shooting death of African-American teen Trayvon Martin in February 2012.

Black Lives Matter became nationally renowned for its street demonstrations following the killings of Michael Brown in Ferguson in 2014 and Eric Garner in New York City. Since the protests in Ferguson, people in the movement have demonstrated by police actions or in police custody against the killings of many other Afro-Americans. The 2016 U.S. presidential election involved Black Lives Matter activists in the summer of 2015.

Get quality help now
Prof. Finch
Verified writer

Proficient in: Black Lives Matter

4.7 (346)

“ This writer never make an mistake for me always deliver long before due date. Am telling you man this writer is absolutely the best. ”

+84 relevant experts are online
Hire writer

After then they expanded their project into a national network of over 30 local chapters between 2014 and 2016.

Other hashtags have also come out to challenge preceding tales denigrating blacks and Latinos, cisgender people of color, transgender, and gender-nonconforming victims since the popularisation of #blacklivesmatter. Evidence of dialog occurring almost instantly across space and space are provided by Hashtag tags like #Ferguson, #SayHerName, DangerousBlackKids, #StayMadAbby, #NotMyAbuela, #Ferguson, and #BringBackOurGirls. #blacklivesmatter, other hashtags, and the social movement that followed encouraged, over the twenty-first century, a new global space of conversations on race and the importance of social justice.

Get to Know The Price Estimate For Your Paper
Number of pages
Email Invalid email

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

You won’t be charged yet!

The social media protests are not confined to those who demand racial justice. Rather, Twitter is also a resource for conservative communities. Civil society may find its greatest expression online now more than ever before. It changed the race conversation after the 2008 election of Barack Obama. While many people celebrated the first Black President’s election, others claimed they were ‘average’ citizens and joined forces to ‘recover’ their country. Now in 2016 Twitter hashtags are used to support groups, like #MakeAmericaGreatAgain and Alternative Right. Established in 2006, Twitter has shown itself to be the ideal way of expressing these ‘average’ citizens. It has enhanced the coded idiom that characterizes the post-civil rights era race discourse, which was apparently ‘colorblind’ to criticize the electoral suppression and police violence investigation (Bonilla-Silvani 2013). This aims at protecting the status quo and justifying police actions. Violence targets may still be colorful people, but arms are not just physical but also virtual and discursive spaces.

The term ‘hashtag activism’ amplifies the words often overlooked by the media, but terms such as ‘slacktivism,’ ‘hacktivism’ and ‘clicktivism’ show that it discusses the legitimacy of the social movement. 2 Some argue that Twitter does not necessarily promote political involvement with institutions that are established. This discussion could be the result of Americans understanding social movements. In contrast, European scholars view new social movements ‘less as common interest organizations and more as new forms of collective identity engaged in discursive struggles that transform not only the self-understanding but also the legitimacy of the cultural codes and views they have received’ (Carroll and Hackett 2006, 87). Social media is a critical part of this debate and creates a virtual space to challenge, reframe and register the representations of those who are victimized. Communities such as Black Lives Matter (BLM) challenge the legitimacy of a judicial system that has apparently been ‘colorblind.’ These communities also redefine social justice and give voice to those who identify as LGBTQ and/or are gender nonconforming and those who have been historically marginalized in traditional civil rights movements.

#BlackLivesMatter is used to promote the organization and plantation of protests against racial profiling and police brutality in the United States, and to build solidarity in different parts of the world, rather than to raise awareness about specific social problems or even to promote public discussions on race and social justice. For example, people took a micro of scheduled speakers to challenge the apathetic college administrators, unresponsive politicians, and police force (Sanders 2015 Gutierrez 2015). They also used the ‘policy of interruption’ in their own right to assert the power of their own vocal voice. In the present time, young people can seize a more participatory and non-mediated global voice from traditional institutions. Organizationally, this unrefereed access to one another distinguishes the youth of today from their Civil Rights era predecessors who relied on public spaces, newspapers, and television to transmit their practice of non-violent civil disobedience and disruption of commerce to a global audience. People use social media to “write back” to a situation. This expanded protest arsenal includes images as “voice.” Twitter users are challenging the way images are staged by mainstream media. By posting your selfies with hoodies to show they may be Trayvon, they show solidarity. Bonilla and Rosa argue: ‘While racialized young people can not contest in face-to-face interacting the significance attributed to their bodies (or prevent the murderous violence perpetrated by police against them) through their social media reinterpretations, they can restore their bodies in alternative ways. Through both text and image, users constitute themselves as political actors.

There is lots of criticism as well as support on the Black live matters on the media. Some portrayed as a movement of the people whereas some blame for worsening race relations in America. The rise of Black Lives Matter: Trying to break the cycle of violence and silence an article published on the CNN news on December 28, 2015, by Sara Sidner and Mallory Simon Reflects how black live matters is fighting for the movement for the lives of people. It wouldn’t last, Critics said. It was a blip in the protest radar. Like Occupy Wall Street, it would fade away. Some people said it was bound to fail, especially when the infighting started, without a clear structure and no strong leader. However, it’s still rising— and polarizing.

Similarly, in an article published on ACLU by Frank Leon Roberts, he mentioned that the activist working with black live matters changed the way Americans fight for freedom. It doesn’t only encourage people to fight for the rights but also lets other people know about the situation going on through the internet. People all around the world even if they are not fighting for the rights can know about the discrimination as well as how innocent people were killed by the violence of police as well as white superfast. So It has changed the way of people fight for their freedom and brings a new era of movement.

We have access through social media to a large range of perpetrators, sometimes self-created. Virtual communities, as well as traditional media, are available on different Facebook pages of victims and their family members.

Presenting pictures by Emmett Till, a murdered woman, who confronted Trayvon Martin with his hooded sweatshirt and drivers in the Black Media of that day who looked like a teenager, provides a whole new opportunity in which to speak about black men’s historical depictions.

The murders and the general failure on the part of the judiciary to secure convictions inspired users to post pictures of blacks with the hashtag #Gangrant BlacksKids (Jeltson 2014), showing the tragic reality: black children, in a manner that would be the same as those killed by the murdered men, Jordan Davis (whose killers were ultimately retried and sentenced to life in jail without parole). Social media becomes more than just a conversation site when they juxtapose the images and put them in personal, family, and home contexts. For the people, it can be a particularly vivid representation of what has been lost to see a young black man or woman in her graduation gown. Social media have become an analysis venue in which people can engage not only a wider political community but also to see contemporary moments as part of major historical discussions.

Campaign Zero, which consists of ten proposals, all designed to reduce police violence, is a police reform campaign put forward by Black Lives Matter related activists at the website launched on 21 August 2015. The planning team of the campaign includes Brittany Packnett, Samuel Sinyangwe, DeRay Mckesson, and Johnetta Elzie. In response to criticisms that asked them to make specific policy proposals, activists produced the proposals.

Campaign Zero also introduces policies to identify the political positions of presidential candidates on these issues. Racial justice activists recently campaigned for action planning against police brutality and criminal justice reforms in candidates such as Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Martin O’Malley, and Jeb Bush.

Most of the people on the news had criticized campaign zero as part of the black live matters but that’s the different organizations. they are both under the umbrella of the broader Black Lives Matter movement, their campaigns, rallies, disruptions, and direct actions often affect each other. It’s why one criticism of Campaign Zero is that, in some cases, it duplicates work already being done. The network Black Lives Matter and Campaign Zero are also disappointed to cross drills. The prominent activists fight in favor of loyalty. More important, people outside the movement, from national leaders to big donors and candidates for the presidential elections, are uncertain of how the different entities can navigate.

That’s a warning: Campaign Zero isn’t an organization–it’s just a political platform. The platform is not static the group releases policies, ideas, and feedback from its launch day, for everybody, and how that feedback is included in what are referred to as a living document by the activists.

Both activist groups are fighting for the welfare of the people as well as society. They have a common ground to bring peace in the society as well as decrease the social violence against the people. There were lots of people who criticized the movement and thought it will not last long because of their vision as well as lack of proper ideology but we are here where BLM and Campaign zero created the new era of movement for the people to fight for their rights as well as for their freedom. Social media has played a vital role in the success of these kinds of movements as well as encourage people to come forward to fight for their rights.

There is always a negative and positive side to each and every point. Some people tried to put this activist as a movement of the new era where some think that’s the way of making more racism in the country as they made #alllifematter to criticize the movement done by the BLM.

Cite this page

Analysis of Black Lives Matter Global Network. (2021, Jan 26). Retrieved from

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

get help with your assignment