Al in Phoenix Essay

Custom Student Mr. Teacher ENG 1001-04 2 January 2017

Al in Phoenix

In Dagoberto Gilb’s story “Al in Phoenix” the narrator feels that Al is treating him unfairly. The narrator believes that Al thinks of him as a guy that is living loose and not bothering to get a job (Gilb 75-81). The narrator being the inductive thinker thought that Al was being unfair to him because of the way he was being treated. Al on the other hand, uses deductive thinker because he just based his facts about the truth.

Al based that the only reason the narrator is at the garage getting his car fixed was because of it having problems and probably because he had the image of the narrator of being a living loose type of person that worries about every single little thing. In his short story, Gilb uses two different types of characters. One of the characters being inductive meaning that they make an inference based on fact, or a conclusion about the unknown based on what is known. The other character being deductive meaning when an argument rests on a fact, a fundamental truth, a right, or a value.

Gilb’s story “Al in Phoenix,” tells of a guy, who is the narrator, whose car breaks down in Phoenix, Arizona. The narrator dials Triple-A hoping they could help him out with the car. A tow truck arrives and takes his car to a mechanic that was well-known in the city of Phoenix, Arizona. The mechanic named Al was long-familiar for fixing any car’s troubles and not charging so much for a single tire placement. The narrator was worried that the car’s repair would cost him a fortune just like at another city he was at.

Therefore, Al was making the narrator impatient and nervous (Gilb 75-81). Al only kept repeating, “I can’t say everything needs time” (Gilb 75-81). The narrator annoyed of the quote started to get angry. Al repairs the narrator’s car in under an hour making the Narrator sigh in relief. The narrator pays his bill, which he is fairly shocked to see, was relatively at a good bargain, before heading to a motel to spend the night. The next morning the narrator ends up happy with the work done as he is driving down the road.

He soon starts to hear a disturbing sound coming from the engine. He realizes that his car is yet again about to break down by the side along the road. The narrator being frustrated dials Triple A and a tow truck soon arrives yet again to pick up his broken-down truck. He tells the tow-truck driver to take him back to Al’s repair shop to get his car checked. The tow-truck driver tried convincing the narrator to go to this other mechanic that was close to where the narrator’s car had broken down.

The narrator tells the ow-truck driver that he would rather prefer Al’s shop because he trusts his handy work. When he arrives at Al’s garage, he sees a very annoyed Al talking to the tow-truck driver. After being annoyed for a while the narrator decided to call up Triple A to tell them the way Al was treating him and how he was being treated unfairly. Triple A told the narrator whom they understand what he was talking about, and that they would file a report. The narrator was later pleased with the call. After hours of Al fixing another peoples’ car he started to set up to check out the narrator’s car.

Al spends hours on the car trying to fix every single little messed up and broken pieces Al in the end got the car back to the way it was before it broke down and probably better. The narrator thanked Al for the work he did on the car and truly appreciated the handy work he had done on the car. As the narrator drove of he felt like the car was never in its previous state. The narrator within the story seems to be the type that makes an inference of the unknown based on what is known. The narrator you could say is an Inductive person. He believes that Al is an unmannered rude mechanic.

That narrator believes that Al has something against him and is being races to him. The one thing that the narrator didn’t know was that he was judging Al for what he was doing and not bothering to ask why he did that. The narrator never bothered to ask what Al’s problem was instead he just went to point by point before making the final judgment. Al on the other hand, is the deductive type of person. He likes to get straight to the point when it comes to fixing up a car. When Al is working on a car, he gets straight to the point of the problem.

He later gets straight to the point to see what the cause of the problem was. Al tires his best to fix the car by starting with the main problem after that goes straight to the cause. He is deductive because when fixing a car, he always checks the hood before looking at anything else. I believe that Dagoberto Gilb wrote this story to show the readers not to just get straight to the point but try to get to their perspective. I believe that Gilb wrote it thinking of people who were around him that just so happened to be doing the same thing.

Al and the narrator seem to be the type of people who will not get along with each other. At times, the characters change from one perspective to another making it difficult for each other to know what the other is really thinking. Al, in Phoenix tells of two characters that see each other by a different perspective. One character sees the other as just a plain person that is rude to most of his customers and can be races at times (Gilb 75-81). While the other character is trying to fix the car of those who brought it in order to get checked.

I believe that Dagoberto wrote this short story to show people who there are people whom judge by just saying some plain words and that sometimes people saw the opposite side of another person. Dagoberto probably wrote this short story witnessing something like it or actually being a part of it. He shows details on how the character is feeling and on how the narrator is being treated in a specific detail, as if though he was the one that they had talked to in the sort of way. It is interesting on how he sets the narrator’s words in a way to make someone think that they are the ones apart of the story.

Free Al in Phoenix Essay Sample


  • Subject:

  • University/College: University of Arkansas System

  • Type of paper: Thesis/Dissertation Chapter

  • Date: 2 January 2017

  • Words:

  • Pages:

Let us write you a custom essay sample on Al in Phoenix

for only $16.38 $13.9/page

your testimonials