Essay, Pages 3 (687 words)
Those of individuals that are brought up in common western culture think that Muslim women who wear the task symbolize the ongoing oppression of females in the Middle East. In “To Veil or Not To Veil” Jen’nan Ghazal and John P. Bartkowski perform a case study of different kinds of identity amongst Muslim females in Austin Texas. This experiment dives into Muslim culture and tries to analyze both sides of the argument a primarily accurate essay. The article carefully analyses both sides of the concern in an attempt to much better comprehend what the head coverings imply for these females, and how their gender functions compare as muslim women.
It appears that some people of the west stop working to do prior to making assumptions about Middle Eastern injustice of ladies, numerous stop to ask a Muslim female what she thinks about wearing a veil. In their case research study Ghazel and Bartkowski talked to twelve veiled ladies and twelve revealed ladies in Austin, Texas and asked them concerns surrounding the controversy of the hijab.
Islamic females’s motivations for veiling seem to differ drastically. The variety can be broad as expressing their strongly held conviction, to review western culture, for strictly religious purposes, and to be seen not just as females, however as intellectual equates to. Some of verses in the Qur’an and Hadiths (Islam’s holy texts) say that ladies must use to hijab to not tempt men which to be a great Muslim female she should hide her body.
This belief makes women overall much more modest and submissive. The Islamic religion according to the article is very much a patriarchal religious institution and some of the bureaucratic men in the society are said to see the veil as a way to keep women subservient in their society. This appears to be the central reason why unveiled women do not wear a hijab. They believe that because the head covering wasn’t originally created by Islam they shouldn’t have to wear it to achieve spiritual welfare or be considered of higher religious caliber. They believe the hijab is an oppressive tool to leave the male social hierarchy as it is now. By not wearing the hijab it appears that the majority of women feel empowered verses those woman who do where a veil. But it is important to note that there exceptions to the rule, the article talked about a girl who wore the hijab to be taken seriously by society and move up the social hierarchy.
This article primarily uses an empirical methodology. The arguments are portrayed through the research and case study that the two authors conducted in Austin, Texas. Both arguments are covered thoroughly and some quantitative data is used. As I read the article I found it surprising that the two authors only conducted this study on twenty four women, twenty four Americanized women no less. An American Muslim woman verses a Middle Eastern Muslim woman can have very different views on the issue simply because the societies are so different, it is possible that the culture of the United States is encouraging this challenging think by these twenty four women.
I also found it a little shocking that the article failed to address the factor fear plays in Middle Eastern Muslim women to wear the hijab. The majority of the Middle East is based on an ideology called Timocracy which is a society based on honor. When women in some countries do not wear the veil they are in affect disrespecting Islam and the nation according to some more radical Muslims. Because of this many women are punished by being beaten for something as little as a veil slipping in public.
It is clear that a hijab does not have just one singular meaning. The veil may be a piece of the Islamic religion, but it is how women view and own the veil that determines what gender arises for the issue. While the some of the cultures may be forced on women, like Iran it takes independent and free thinking women to determine the culture now and how it will evolve.