A Troublesome Property: Master-Slave Relations in Florida, 1821-1865 Essay

In the extract. “A Troublesome Property: Master-Slave Relationss in Florida. 1821-1865. the writer. Larry Rivers. focal points on the interaction between bondmans and Masterss in Florida. It entails the theory that the maestro might claim the organic structure of his belongings but could ne'er rather rule his or her psyche. The province of Florida was one that differed in several facets from other provinces in the old South which it made known as a free province. There were no slave Torahs and therefore.

it was considered a safe oasis for many runaway slaves and the Seminole Indians. Due to the fact that there were no slave Torahs. the slaves frequently rebelled against their Masterss. As a consequence of such rebellions. there was a subject job that led many proprietors to comprehend their slaves as “a troublesome belongings. ” The three countries that the slaves had problem with their proprietors were spiritual behaviour. interpersonal dealingss. and work. With respects to religion. many slave proprietors.

Get quality help now

Prof. Finch

Verified writer

Proficient in: Slavery And Freedom

4.7 (346)

“ This writer never make an mistake for me always deliver long before due date. Am telling you man this writer is absolutely the best. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

such as. Zephaniah Kingsley and Judge Wilkerson believed that spiritual looks were a signifier of independency and would endanger break one's back control. They believed that their slaves’ would go more sceptered and have more courage and be more hard to manage and more disobedient. However. other slave proprietors believed that it should be used as an instrument of control. When slaves were really able to go to Christian services. it was by a white curate who taught them to obey their Masterss in order to be saved by God.

However. if they disobeyed them. they would non be saved. but destined for damnation. Another facet. in which there was contention. was with interpersonal dealingss. Slave proprietors believed that if the slaves were married and maintained a household that it would take to good behaviour and higher productiveness. Yet. there were many slave proprietors who did non desire their slaves get marrieding other slaves from different plantations. Nor did these break one's back proprietors want their slaves holding other slaves visit them or frailty versa. The lone ground that those slave proprietors finally complied is for the fact that the figure of male slaves on certain belongingss began outnumbering the figure of female slaves. Slaves were so merely allowed to get married if they vowed to stay loyal to their Masterss and kept working expeditiously.

The work forms of the slaves were another facet that caused contention. The legal system that gave plantation owners absolute power was said to non guarantee effectual control of the quality or measure of work performed. Slaves frequently resisted and deficient supervising intensified jobs. As a consequence. Slave proprietors were forced to compromise with the slaves ; leting slaves to describe to work after dawn and to work under less-immediate supervising than other plantations had. Gang systems were besides implemented to increase the efficiency and productiveness of the workers. Nevertheless. many slaves were executing ill. ensuing in the determination of terrible penalties and menaces of being sold. When that failed they resorted to positive incentives which included ; excess yearss off during the vacations. extra nutrient allocations. extra free clip. or money. In my sentiment. I believe the information provided was really insightful. Rivers gave an in deepness apprehension on the relationship between the slave Masterss and the slaves. It was really honoring to cognize that non all slaves were submissive to their slave Masterss but instead many stood up for what they believe in. I commend all the slaves that were brave plenty to put on the line their ain life’s to pattern their faith the right manner in secret. They knew what the reverberations would be harsh but they had to contend for what they believed in. I besides want to praise the brave work forces and adult females who chose to contend back. like Douglass Dorsey who tried to poison his maestro after witnessing how viciously his female parent was treated. The slaves used what they had to their advantage go forthing the slave proprietors no other pick but to dicker with them ; this is an prototype of how standing up for what you believe in can do a difference.