International intervention should be integrated and applied in the global realms to assist in safeguarding the sanctity and integrity of the people globally. It should be the main supporting stone and stepping stone in ensuring that global peace is maintained at all cost. This has mostly been the emphatic consideration that due to the extended unethical impacts that result especially from war.
Recently, the cry of innocent blood from the ground and demand for sanctity echoed in the Iraq walls that have been doomed by intrinsic shenanigans of generalized abuse by militia groups and the American-led soldiers in the country has indicated the shameful abyss from the recent war. The current “widely announced semi peace” has been termed as a major insult and a cover up to the unchanged situation in the country. This paper explores the demand for international invention in the global operations to assist in reducing the negative resultant implications.
Taking Iraq as major case, the paper evaluates the position of the international community before and during the progress of war while taking a closer outlook on its stand with regard to the case. Understanding that the war was greatly monopolistic in preparation and application, the paper weighs the situation on whether it would have been better to involve the international community from the beginning. With external focus, the paper derives other similar examples to emphasis on the situation by exploring the moral dilemma resulting from their cases.
Finally, the paper uses the theoretical perspectives in deriving the alternatives and ascertaining recommendation to prevent recurrence. Overview of war in Iraq and demand for intervention ? Internal and external threats concerns and the global position The reference of internally defended genocide, massive abuse of human rights and notion of the lowest levels of democracy has possibly been the major quagmire in ascertaining sovereignty to countries like Iraq. The war in Iraq was marred with mixed connotations that did put the international community and US at cross roads.
Globally, the notion of terrorism has turned the authorities to seek better ways of addressing the vice. War in Vietnam and the mind bursting World Trade Center terrorist attack were possibly the cementing basements for the US-led invasion into Iraq (Steve, 8). For Iraq, North Korea and Iran, President Bush referred to them as the “axis of the devil” with greater emphasis on Saddam Hussein for supporting terror groups against US. Iraq was accused of seeking chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction.
The president was also at the heart of pursuing nuclear energy to attack his enemies and maintain his supremacy in the region. As indicated earlier, he was linked with Al-Qaeda and was considered a major threat to the region as a whole. To add to that, democracy was non existent in the country with many people living in exile and massive torture being the order of the day in some of the worst jails like Abu Graib (Larry, 59-62). Operations and the international community analysis ? Issues analysis in the attack and aftermath
Arguably, revenge for evil with evil aggravates the prior condition of a given problem. International laws that bind countries together to ensure the best courses of action were on course by the time Iraq was invaded in the year 2003 (Shai et al, 15-19). With the group on the ground indicating of no possible signs of the earlier described weapons of mass destruction, the invasion was strongly untimely and perhaps unjustified. To add to that, the international laws are meant for minimal conflicts that can instill the minimal possible negative impacts to the governments, the people, and their economy.
To add to that it was later argued that the chaos in Iraq could have been avoided should the real focus have been put to topple the dictatorship regime as opposed to inflicting massive pain to the citizens. Analysts described the war as one of the worst in recent history due to the extent of destruction and suffering. This ranged from return of the militia to the country and the general lawlessness of the people due to mixed reactions of the dictators toppling.
Different from what President George Bush describes as “mission accomplished”, the sovereignty of the people in Iraq is far from being achieved. Massive infrastructure was destroyed depriving the citizens of their reliance for livelihood (Larry, 139-140). The present state of the country is been described to be no better than the pre-war period due to continued suffering of the people especially from suicide bombers and insurgent groups. By the end of the year 2007, about 100, 000 million Iraqis had lost their lives with one million more living as refugees in the neighboring countries (Steven, 8).
International community’s position has always been that the measure taken should take into consideration provision of the best humanitarian assistance that ensures the least possible suffering to the people especially the citizens. International community’s position of current rebuilding and restoration of justice in Iraq has added the emphasis of its logical and unbiased ethical consideration aimed at reducing human suffering with the greatest possible margin. ? Ethical dilemma of the process and possible alternatives
As indicated earlier, the global front in conflict resolution and proactive demand gives a holistic consideration of the incumbent situation by deriving non biased demands that are satisfactory to all the parties. However, due to the pace of the progress and possible sympathy to the victims, international community has been accused of not being effective in situations like the famous genocide of Rwanda and recent Russia invasion into Georgia. It is clear that the largest number of people who have suffered in Iraq were the citizens who lost their loved ones, relatives, and properties in the war (Michael 102-106).
According to utilitarian theories, it is always important to ensure that all the actions taken have the highest benefits to the maximum number of people possible. At this appoint, analysts have been sharply divided over the best course of action that could have been taken to effect the removal of the controversial Saddam Hussein government. However, the applied force has been questioned due to its deliberate failure to consider the aftermath effects of war or being ignorant altogether (Joel, & Christian, 107-110).
The present rise of insurgence further indicates a totally failed or incomplete operation. Though the threat had always recurred and the brutal rule existed since the first war in the Gulf, the global community should have taken a stronger stand as the dictator was purely understood and his capacity to suppress local communities evident. Secondly, the international community could have used its power to force democracy and ensure that better rule of the law prevailed. Through democratic considerations, it is clear that non humane actions would not have position in the country.
With the above options failing to operate in the past, the international community role is and should always be directed at ensuring human beings are offered the best protection (Michael 2-3). Therefore, it should get into the country and revitalize the situation necessary to restore the sanctity of the human livelihood in totality. To add to that, it should ensure that the one time self reliant country gets back to the required international status of cohesive productivity especially for the precious petroleum.
It is the work of the international community to nurse the new born country with hostile organs and change their ideologies to globally acceptable levels. This will however take time and demands patience. Conclusion and recommendation The demand for peace on a global scale has shifted from being an individualistic consideration of state boundaries due to increased internationalism and global interdependence. Local implications have therefore increasingly become a center of focus for the international community as they dictate the ability of all the communities to coexist.
The effects of war in Iraq resonate in the global community and demand that the present situations be addressed with urgency. Though it is considered that the process of rebuilding the same country may take much longer, the current government and the available resources coupled with external monitoring should be applied in the particularistic situation and the local forces prepared to restore order on a long term jurisdiction (Michael 102-106). However, as the long term measures are executed, the supply of humanitarian services should be established without delay to all the affected people.
International intervention as a factor of local application in the highly globalized world should be vibrant and proactive to reduce such cases resilience. Arguably, the international community should establish boarder non-restricted authorities that can ascertain and provide the most precise and correct information with regard to international conflicts and crisis. Though tainted with harmful reactive nature, the international community should be given more powers and authority as the only entity that can authorize war while at the same time laying down very strong and effective penalties for the abusers of the same law.
At all cost, at all time, the demands and calls for integrity and sanctity of the citizens globally should be the baseline of the international intervention. Work cited page Larry, Diamond, The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies Throughout the World. New York: Times Books/Henry Holt and Company, 2009. Steven, Lee, M, Iraq. New York, Times, April 16, 2009. Available at topics. nytimes. com/topics/news/international/countriesandterritories/iraq/index. html – Michael, Scheuer, Marching Toward Hell: America and Islam After Iraq.
New York: Simon & Schuster, 2009. Michael, Gordon, Cobra II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq, 2006, Retrieved from, www. foreignaffairs. com/articles/61796/lawrence-d-freedman/cobra-ii- the-inside-story-of-the-invasion-and-occupation-of-iraq Joel, Rosenthal, & Christian Barry, Ethics & International Affairs: A Reader. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2009. Shai, Feldman, Merkaz Yafeh-le-me?? arim, After the war in Iraq: defining the new strategic balance. New Jersey: Sussex Academic Press, 2003.