The development of public social networking websites is surely apparent to anyone in the Twenty first century. Because the world has been changing so much technically, public media tools and websites also consume me. It appears that websites have begun to modify my identity as an individual, whether I like it or not. Some of these changes are good, and yet others are not. Social systems have modified my identity by allowing me become friends with and connect with people more regularly. Unfortunately, they have also limited my face-to-face discussions with loved ones, and not given me deep/solid connections with all of my “friends.
Although public media websites are efficient in providing ways to connect, we need to restrict our use of public media websites to be able to become stronger as people and to strengthen our connections. Due to the development of public social networking websites, I have witnessed a change in my connections with more of my close relatives and associates. This development is based from public media websites because I have been able to connect with them more regularly. Even the most distant connections can be held together through social networking.
For example, when I was away completing my army training. Thanks to social networks, I have been able to keep in frequent contact with my immediate family members and friends while I was away. Almost all social media websites have a chat function, which allows for quick discussions between two available people. This function is relaxing in that it moves around an individual’s schedule. Rather than having your cellphone ring in the middle of something, you can show people when you are or are not available to chat.
Whether it’s a second, an hour or a day, the discussion doesn’t necessarily finish. In most cases, there is more than one individual on a social media website at some point. With this, people have the option to select who they want to talk to, and when. Also unlike cellphone calls, an individual is given the information of who is available to chat. For example, if I were to contact someone, I would not have the knowledge of whether or not they would answer, as well as where they may be or what they may be doing.
On the contrary, if I were to go on Facebook and see who is available on the chat selection, I would have the power to select who I wanted to talk to, and would know that they are available to reply. I would also know that they are not in the middle of something at the moment, or else they would not be on the website to begin with. The independence to connect with my friends more regularly has allowed our connections to grow. Although this freedom in communication seems ideal and allows for development in connections, it has side effects on the one’s identity.
These same social media websites, such as Facebook and Twitter, can become habit forming and over-used, leading to broken connections because the people are so caught up on the technological aspect that they ignore the more essential face-to-face communications. The habit issue that people are faced with on public social networking websites is very unfortunate. Relationships can be hurt if not damaged by excessive use of a website. Because an individual seems to spend a longer period on websites like Facebook or Twitter, they are spending shorter period with loved ones.
The lack of an actual existence affects any relationship. If the habit became extremely severe, it could probably end up ruining connection. This lack of friendship would be even more interesting if the people were still “friends” on facebook or twitter. Many public media websites can also be misleading. On websites like Facebook and Twitter, “friends” can overflow people. Although they are called “friends,” most of the people who you connect with or see on such websites are just associates. They are people who one has seen a few times if that, and were included or included them as a “friend. Unfortunately, one’s “social status” is judged by the quantity of “friends” they possess. Those who have a low amount of “friends” on social networking websites could drop in self-esteem, and probably become depressed. However, the reality could be that they have more real friends than another individual who has a greater number of “friends” on a social networking website.
The impact that popularity has on an individual can become very apparent very quickly, and an individual with more “friends” can result in thinking that they are etter than others who don’t have the same quantity of “friends”. This is very deceitful and a bad impact of public social networking. In addition to being deceitful, these websites can ultimately damage the real significance of relationship. As said before, these websites can become habit forming to its users. The lack of an actual existence in relationships would then reduce the significance of the relationship itself. It is impossible to keep a real connection without seeing the actual person face-to-face.
For instance, if I only talked to my friends online but never actually hung out with them, our relationships would be practically nonexistent. It is essential for people to always remember that to be able for relationships to work out, they must see also connect in the real world. Social networking websites can take away from this if over-used. Although social networking websites allow for more discussion among more people, they can also be deceitful systems that restrict face-to-face communications and possibly damage the real significance of relationship.
They allow for more discussion by showing who is available to discuss. This gives people the freedom to talk to whoever, whenever, which increases connections. Unfortunately, the over-use of these sites can restrict how long that people have to connect in person. Luckily, restricting how long one spends his time on a social networking website can lead to the perfect relationship: one with just the right amount of time together face-to-face and just the right amount of time connecting online as well.