“The Latest from the Feminist “Front” by Rush Limbaugh argument is that how male’s pursuit females. The title “Feminist Front is the first evidence that the writer use to characterize feminist create a facade. The writer claims his views on the feminist movement is rough, insensitive, cruel, and provocative. The writer is rough on feminist with is why there is common ground. The excerpt has several logical fallacies which is some type of counter statement that weakens an argument (Writer’s np). There are dozens of articles that are published in newspapers, advertisements, and other sources that have these logical fallacies. It is not easy to know if an argument is fallacious. The argument might be very weak to very strong. The writer makes the first logical fallacy called red herring. A red herring is when during the argument, the arguer changes the topic by raising a side issue that distracts the audience.
The red herring fallacy in the first paragraph reads, “Few of my “Thirty-five Undeniable Truths of Life” have stirred as much controversy and outrage as Number Twenty-four: “Feminism was established so that unattractive women could have easier access to the mainstream of society.” Rush does not explain this truth about unattractive women. This is because he is Rush, a radio personality, which talks harshly and loud to sway people to believe his viewpoint. Now, he is normally wrong in my viewpoint like this excerpt. Rush gets paid to build controversy. Let’s look at his statement about “unattractive” women. The writer’s implied warrant statement about the unattractive feminism is his definition for an outspoken woman.
His first sub-claim implies that some feminist leaders are anti-male, because they speak out when men inappropriately flirt or make inappropriate comments. This is one side of the issue which is called stacked evidence (Woods 222). The audience is supposed to agree with Rush, simply because, he repeats “it’s the truth” which is begging the question (Wood 221). Then he writes “that any expression of interest by a man in a woman is harassment” is hasty generalization. He generalize the term by demeaning the value of a woman’s feelings. Subsequently, these extremist “would make men fearful of approaching women”, he writes in paragraph 7 shows hasty generalization. Rush is implying the all men would be fearful to approach a women because the actions of a few men. He writes “people are labeling every day, normal, male-female conduct as harassment” not real rape.
Rush uses slippery slope as an emotional fallacy by making women afraid to report harassment. Slippery slope is a scare tactic, when one thing happens it will immediately cause disaster. The second sub-claim is “that women have more power than most of them realize” in paragraph 9 (Wood 233). The explicit warrant state “the power to say yes or no – lies with the women” he unpredictably gives women power. The writer does not value a woman’s word throughout the paper, but now, Rush validates the power of a woman. Then he reverts back to his norm saying men should not be arrested for making a wolf whistle at a comely woman in paragraph thirteen. In conclusion the writer feels feminist women misuse the term harassment and rape.
Because women do not tolerate inappropriate advances from married men they are feminist. He reasons that a woman word is powerful. In fact he feels women are too sensitive. This will cause men to stop flirting with women. Rush could have used statistics for the number of rape cases that were actually harassment cases. In addition, he should have debated a female to get the woman’s viewpoint. I’ve listened to Rush on the radio and like the excerpt he exaggerates the issue in a loud voice. He does not use statistic, or a professional to support his claims.
Miller, James, and Wood, Nancy. “Perspectives on Argument,” New Jersey: Upper Saddle River, Pearson Education, Inc., 2012. Print. “Linking Words.” English Language Smart Words 6 Aug. 2014: 10. Print. “The Writing Center.” The Writing Center. 1 Aug. 2014. Web. 11 Aug. 2014. .