The first article I chose is called “Case Study in Threats of Workplace Violence From a Non-Supervisory Basis. The case study explores ethical and legal issues concerning employees who bring weapons to work and the psychological effect of that on other employees (Taylor & Zeng). Another thing that is examined in this case study is peer bullying and threats of workplace violence. The accompanying literature of this cause study states that the reason why the violence made by women to the men is because, number one, it’s being ignored frequently due to the fact of gender stereotyping.
Although this case study is about a female threatening a male coworker, Chavez reviewed a 280 sampling of internal workplace violence is a vengeful act overwhelmingly carried out by men (Taylor & Zeng). Workplace violence is a big issue and it can represent extreme issue in the work place; and traumatize professional and person effects. Could the lack of inappropriate managerial reaction in the case study be also attributed to the gender of the aggressor? Chavez found that acts of violence are usually committed by males and threats of violence by women may not be taken seriously in the workplace because of gender stereotyping (Taylor & Zeng).
Employers can avoid the workplace violence and harassment instances if a vigilant hiring process was being used. When there is bullying going on in the workplace, employers have to act quickly. The employer needs to have an increased security and install metal detectors in order to make their employees feel safe and comfortable. However, in this scenario it was not done, they created a rule for no guns to be allowed at work. The study of this was made on a man name Sam. This rule didn’t work for him. He still feared that Mrs. G. had a gun in her tote bag at work.
The scenario indicates that when one of the risks of doing nothing or not enough to make the employees safe and comfortable when they are at work, then some of the best employee might leave. This can happen because no one wants to work in a stressful environment in their office to where that might be physically hurt. In conclusion, all employers and management have some type of training system so that they can be prepared for workplace violence.
The second article that I chose is called “Physical Punishment of Children: Lesson from 20 years of Research. The studies in this article found that physical punishment was associated with higher levels of aggression against parents, siblings, peers, and spouses; but were physical punishment and childhood aggression statistically associated because more aggressive children elicit higher levels of physical punishment? (Durrant & Ensom) One early modeling study with boys in 1st grade watched a video of another boy getting yelled at, spanked with a paddle, and shaked because they were misbehaving.
More aggression occurred while playing with dolls than those boys who viewed that one minute video. In the treatment study, there were boys at risk for antisocial behavior and it was used by the parents of these boys which showed a reduction in harsh discipline in their children’s aggression after the treatment. After these findings were made, they were able to identify the mechanisms of physical punishment and child aggression. Randomized control trails came along in the 1900’s which was then used to study the children with physical punishment.
Even though this can be used to study the effect of reducing physical punishment, they can’t use it to effect the imposing of the punishment because it would be unapproved for children to be assigned to such groups with painful treatment. Especially when such pain would a danger to the children and not be by a potential benefit. It was that the randomized control trails showed that physical punishment wasn’t any more effective than the other methods. In one study in order to elicit compliance an average of eight spankings was needed in a single session.
During this session there was no support for the necessity of the physical punishment. Researchers also designed prospective studies of children who had equal levels of aggression and antisocial behavior. Another large study in Canada was found that parents who spank their children, then the children more likely to attack their parents than children who didn’t get spanked. In conclusion, the equally irresistible parents need to be strongly encouraged to develop positive and alternative approaches to discipline.
The third article I chose is “Anger and Violence Prevention: Enhancing Treatment Effects Through Booster’s Sessions. ” This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of booster sessions on the maintenance of intervention gains following an anger management prevention program: Student Created Aggression Replacement Education Program (SCARE). (Bundy & McWhirter) The participants that already done the SCARE program were randomly assigned to a booster treatment. The SCARE booster program has promised to maintain and increase treatment effects for 15 sessions particularly to the traits of anger and sympathy.
The booster sessions are to enhance adequacy of interventions are to maintain school retention and to decrease youth violence and aggression. This program has been shown to decrease aggression and disposal anger and to increase a young person’s ability to take an outlook of others. It also helps to improve their well being, to provide support for early adolescents, and to increase school retention. Another study was adolescents who were previously exposed to anger, management program and the SCARE program was to enhance treatment on them with a 5 week booster sessions along with examining its impacts.
This was to see how one group of adolescents was exposed to the SCARE intervention with booster sessions compared to the group who received the SCARE intervention anger and empathy. For the follow up of this study was unable to assimulate the TAU condition of the treatment through grade level. Together with findings of the current investigation, these studies point to the promise of booster effects and suggest the importance of exploring the complexities of successful youth prevention programs in the context of maintains and enhancing initial preventative and therapeutic benefits