Based on structure, the book Republican Paradoxes and Liberal Anxieties by Ronald J. Terchek can be distinguished into two specific components: the initial component of the book introduces the main liberal side, its strengths and capabilities, and just as significantly, the emerging signs of the potential clash in the communitarian sector. The second part portrays the author’s efforts to display the positive and negative impacts of the communitarian sector. Communitarianism and American Politics
Ronald Terchek defines communitarianism as an ideology that overlays community-based cooperation in order to exhibit the advantages of unity as against individualism. Some American societies and organizations implement communitarianism that mixes territorial with product teams. The communitarianist framework enables the US organization or society to explore world economies of scale, whereas the individualist framework manages information close to the necessities of each and every nation (Terchek 4).
Terchek also noted that most successful US companies and organizations also possess degrees of communitarianism, implying that every divisional team has particular roles, but some topics must be decided in unison across all of these teams. Rather than mixing two separate frameworks, some communitarianist frameworks overlap an operational framework with project groups.
Workers are tasked to a cross-operational project group, yet they also belong to an established operational group to which they come back when a project is finished. The communitarianist perspective is implemented systematically or informally, probably through training of new workers or through a sequence of interactions to current workers at the organization or community. Terchek mentions that a communitarianist framework is helpful in the company and management of shared value mechanisms.
Therefore, culture at the community according to Terchek is shared through obvious or invisible ways and studies indicate that invisible means of interaction seem to be more efficient in altering culture than visible means of interaction and the visible and invisible interaction is depended on to give outside justification for the communitarianist framework and encourage members of the community to adjust to the new community practices and ethics.
Terchek also mentions that there are three fundamental procedures of decision-making under the communitarianist approach: the top-down method, the democratic method, and the subculture method (Terchek 5). Top-down or implemented decision-making under the communitarianist approach does not normally happen in the liberal structure of US politics, because their leaders know that it normally leads in developments that are hard to manage, even though they may be effortless to tell to the employees.
In short, they know that top-down methods may lead in forced compliance from the members of the communities, but in reality they do not totally agree to it. Therefore, Terchek encourages US politicians to implement the communitarianist methods to decision-making which are hard and eat up a lot of time, but the dedication and trust to the development is more effective than an altered work setting which enhances outputs and results of the US government.
Procedures of assessment of the decision-making structure of communitarianism also involves monitoring, evaluating the efficiency, or comparison of basic elements with original aspects identified during the inner investigation, something that the liberal perspective does not have. The culture, in short, has developed with low or negative effects on efficiency.
It is clear, nevertheless, that communitarianism can either support or significantly delay a selected tactic and further comprehension of cultural inspirations may be tantamount to entire comprehension of efficient strategic development. Works Cited Terchek, Ronald. Republican Paradoxes and Liberal Anxieties. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. 1996, pp. 4-5.