1. How would you rate President George V.Bush on the four characteristics outlined at the beginning of the case? How would you contrast his reaction to Hurricane Katrina with his reaction to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001? What do you think his handling of these two events says about his leadership? Behind Bush’s strong, proud appearance, there is a much tender, sensitive, sentimental, feeling person. He is probably much shyer and more private than anyone would realize from his initial impression. He is primarily emotional and his views are often dominated by his feelings and by his own personal, subjective experiences, rather than reason, logic, or abstract principles. It is difficult for him to judge situations in a fair, objective manner for his personal sympathies and loyalties usually enter in. Not only have me, most of the authors had rate below average to Bush. Eight months into Bush’s first term as president, the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks occurred.
In response, Bush announced the War on Terror, an international military campaign which included the war in Afghanistan launched in 2001 and the war in Iraq launched in 2003. In addition to national security issues, Bush also promoted policies on the economy, health care, education, and social security reform. He signed into law broad tax cuts, the PATRIOT Act, the No Child Left Behind Act, the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, and Medicare prescription drug benefits for seniors. His tenure saw national debates on immigration, Social Security, electronic surveillance, and enhanced interrogation techniques. He announced the U.S. would not implement the Kyoto Protocol on global warming, which had been signed by the previous administration but never ratified by the Senate
2. Do you think leaders in other contexts (business, sports, and religious) exhibit the same qualities of great or near-great U.S. presidents? Well in some cases I think so.in some ways…. They have pressure on them to be great, they are looked up to, have to keep their image up. On the other hand, I think business, sports, and religious leaders know, deep down, that they can leave and get away from people, weather it looks bad or not, even if they never do because they are too afraid. Whereas presidents have the whole US of A relying on them just to live safely. There is nowhere to run. That must be so terrifying at times.it takes a certain person to do that. 3. Do you think being in the right place at the right time could influence presidential greatness? Influence in the sense of drawing out the inherent greatness. Some presidents, faced with monumental challenges, met them with courage, intelligence, and wisdom. Some haven’t.
9-11 was an opportunity to bring the world together for a common cause. A great man, or even a good man, would have welcomed that opportunity. A very small weak mind would not. Definitely! the president has to be absolutely aware that he may not appear to be going or doing the right thing when, in fact, his intentions are sincere Of course.