This paper tackles the similarities and differences of the powers of the public police force with those of other forms of administration such as security professional in preventing and identifying fraud. Generally, fraud can not only be viewed as an organizational problem but also a societal problem. The major issue of the vocation of a public police officer is defending the general public against threats and to manage the society and this happens only if the individuals in society comply with the rules and regulations of the State laws.
It further discusses the nature of police work compared to other occupations and lastly mentions some of the challenges that are faced by police administrators. (Swanson & Taylor, 2004, p. 66) How police administration is generally similar and different from other forms of administration The detecting responsibilities of civic law enforcement are based on looking for the truth, and this is irrespective of what the result will be, and all this is done for the interest of unlawful law and the general public.
The security professional on the other hand has to serve his organization-his client whereas the civic police officer has to serve the officially permitted rights of the law and the rights of the general public. When the public officeholder focuses on an offense like fraud, it then follows that his practice will conclude with apprehend of the suspect and making an authorized report and this is for the purpose of a fair trial. (Swanson & Taylor, 2004, p. 88) The civic police officer’s major assignment lies in detecting an offense that has already been dedicated or one that is in development.
The detecting of such an offense in an untimely phase can be viewed as prevention. The restriction in commercial method of the civic police officer in contrast with the security professional lies in the fact that the police officer has to formulate a report and pursue officially permitted procedures when he discovers a crime. It then follows that his private coworker can and mostly will proceed otherwise. (Swanson & Taylor, 2004, p. 91) The concern and requirements of a security occupation is connected to the corporation concerns.
It is concerned with how a corporation can endure threats from any category, and this is in regard with the set of laws and regulations that are given in the society. It should be noted that the security professional, though bound by the restrictions of the decree, is not reserved to the identical officially authorized procedures as the civic police officer. On the contrary, it is the later that is restricted through the law. For instance, he cannot look in the confidential directorial information without having a guarantee. The security expert has at all times, and without restrictions accessed to the private directorial information. Swanson & Taylor, 2004, p. 93) Nevertheless, the security expert and the civic police officer do have some similarities. If we compare their daily tasks for instance, we find that they both carry out investigations, and this is regardless of their input. They both endeavor to do what is most excellent in their own curiosity. Moreover, the mode of exploration is mostly the same. While the public police officer uses lawful legislative tools where his authority is based on laws, his private colleague, the security expert uses organizational tools.
It is a fact that they both through the civic police officer and the security professional used methods like forensic know-how and discipline are alike. (Swanson & Taylor, 2004, p. 99) How police work is different or unique from other occupations Individuals generally depend on law enforcement officers and detectives to guard their lives and possessions. Police officers carry out these duties in a diversity of ways and this depends on the size and kind of their association. In a good number of jurisdictions, they are anticipated to exercise power when required, and this is subject to whether they are on or off duty.
This is different from other occupations such as teaching, engineering, just to mention but a few, in the sense that once they are through with their tasks in the office, they are off duty and won’t be expected to do any task. (Swanson & Taylor, 2004, p. 106) Law enforcement officers and detectives pursue and arrest individuals who break the rule and then issue a word of warning. A huge percentage of their moment in time is spent writing reports and maintaining minutes of events that they encountered.
Majority of the law enforcement officers tour of duty and investigate any doubtful doings they observe. This is unique from other occupations such as banking, medicine, just to mention but a few. However, it should be noted that these occupations also do have written reports except that they are taken care of by other department or some else and not necessarily the doctors or the bankers. (Swanson & Taylor, 2004, p. 109) Police officers more often than not become entitled for promotion subsequent to a probationary episode that ranges from 6 months to 3 years.
In big sections, promotion may permit an official to become a police officer or to focus in one kind of law enforcement work, such as functioning with juveniles. Moreover, they have ongoing training that assists police officers, detective and special representatives to advance on their job performance. This is unique from medicine occupation in the sense that one can only be eligible for promotion as a surgeon only after pursuing masters in it. (Swanson & Taylor, 2004, p. 111) Challenges faced by police administrators Law enforcement and detective task can be very hazardous and demanding.
In addition to the evident threats of confrontations with criminals, law enforcement officers and detectives ought to be continuously watchful and standing by to deal appropriately with a number of other intimidating circumstances. A number of the law enforcement officer’s eyewitness death and anguish resulting from unintentional and illegal conduct. It should be noted that since law enforcement officers are under tremendous stress and are enforced to make instantaneous decisions, they at times make mistakes and individuals are killed or at times dangerously injured. Swanson & Taylor, 2004, p. 114) Law enforcement officers can experience extreme work surroundings beyond regular expectations.
The chronic stressors for law enforcement officers can be pessimistic. Some of the physical health effects comprise of the following; cardiovascular illness, asthma, peptic ulcers, rheumatoid arthritis, obesity and musculoskeletal disarrays. The eventual toll on personnel has up until now to be defined and certain occupations are more vulnerable than others. However, it should be noted that police officers are susceptible to these chronic diseases. Swanson & Taylor, 2004, p. 116) Conclusion Law enforcement administrators countrywide are facing a catastrophe of self-assurance from the individuals they are sworn to serve and defend. Corruption and violence disgrace have harshly discolored the public’s faith in the police force. From the murders and maltreating of citizens to the extensive bribery, a massive number of police administrators are faced with the duty of restructuring law enforcement departments with little direction on how to bring about the required changes.