Facebook is a social networking website whose growth has been rapid and with a lot of controversy. It is quite perceptible that the social networking site can be classified as interactive. Friends’ requests and live chart sessions, group invitations, friend requests, group requests, updates notifications inter alia make this site interactive. Facebook has more than 400 million users; an average user has over 130 friends, a user creates over 70 pieces of content monthly and there are more than 25billion shared content-ranging from photo albums, new stories, and internet links among others.
The long-arm statute gives courts jurisdictions over out-of-state individuals or firms whose activities touch on locals. The long arm jurisdiction has a long history from the Zippo Manufacturing v. Zippo Dot Com, 952 F. Supp. 1119 (W. D. Pa. 1997) (Rosenthal 2003). the case gave a basic precedent of answering the question of long-arm statute. In regard to divergent interpretations of the long-arm statute, respective state laws should be examined in deciding on whether a nonresident defendant is under the jurisdiction of a state and on whether they are answerable in that state’s court.
Long-arm jurisdiction is concerns web page creators since it is applicable internationally. The application of long-arm statute becomes blurred when the court is not able to decide on the interactive-passive distinction. According to Wolf advertising alone is not enough to confer personal jurisdiction (Wolf 1999). Conclusion Web owners may be subjected to personal jurisdiction if the website contains; personal information which can solicit business; if the page violates federal law by using or passing personal information to solicit or receive donations and publishes defamatory information.